- Jan 16, 2011
- 15,022
- 36,491
It's not that nobody cares, it's that their audience agrees with them. Tucker is still on TV even after major advertisers pulled out of his program.many politicians have made anti semitic comments, and nobody cares.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not that nobody cares, it's that their audience agrees with them. Tucker is still on TV even after major advertisers pulled out of his program.many politicians have made anti semitic comments, and nobody cares.
Also a lot of politicians unfortunately don't have the reach or presence like a Kanye West.It's not that nobody cares, it's that their audience agrees with them. Tucker is still on TV even after major advertisers pulled out of his program.
Keep moving the goal postsIt's not that nobody cares, it's that their audience agrees with them. Tucker is still on TV even after major advertisers pulled out of his program.
Yeah, I think Dave takes were not that good.
But I assume he is tryna be edgy
I didn't say it wasn't funny, I just said some of the takes were not good.Well - to be honest, imagining a RustyShackleford comedy special got me rollin over / stomping my chelsea boots laughing already
But if you gonna be rocking your Chelseas at the Shackleford Def Comedy Jam, you might want to get a fresh pair. The ones you got might be a couple sizes too small
He was calling her corruptIf you've done a lot of reading on it
What does the whole "crooked Hillary" thing have to do with "white grievance"?
In addition, he still had a lot of pull within the base and the leadership (up until the midterm results), despite having openly mishandled classified information and lied about it.He was calling her corrupt
But that is not the reason poor white conservatives flocked to him over other Republicans in the primary (like most Republican primary voters would already have a low opinion of her) and swung to him in the general (non-college educated voters have been trending toward the GOP since the 1990s, Trump just accelerated the trend).
Trump ran one of the most corrupt governments in recent history, gave the wealthy a massive tax cut, and tried to make the healthcare for middle and lower-income people much worse, and did just as good in Ohio in 2020 as he did in 2016.
It is the white grievance politics about liberals supposedly putting minorities ahead of white people. Not him being the anti-corruption dude.
Who was looking for a reason not to laugh?See what I mean
Gold!
That's how comedy works when folks aren't looking for a reason not to laugh. IJS.
Who was looking for a reason not to laugh?
He was calling her corrupt
But that is not the reason poor white conservatives flocked to him over other Republicans in the primary (like most Republican primary voters would already have a low opinion of her) and swung to him in the general (non-college educated voters have been trending toward the GOP since the 1990s, Trump just accelerated the trend.
Trump ran one of the most corrupt governments in recent history, gave the wealthy a massive tax cut, and tried to make the healthcare for middle and lower-income people much worse, and did just as good in Ohio in 2020 as he did in 2016.
It is more about white grievance politics about liberals supposedly putting minorities ahead of white people than him being the anti-corruption dude.
Yeah, and a lot of poor uneducated white people bought into his portrayal of her being corrupt
To portray them all as seeking "white grievance" is incredibly narrow minded
You might as well call them all proud boys
This is dumb"I didn't say it wasn't funny, I just said some of the takes were not good."
The assignment was to be funny Fam.
He's a comedian.
Ok, but the point is that given Trump's actions before and after 2016, it is clear he is corrupt too. More than her all things considered. And he pays no electoral price for his corruption
That means these voters are not truly motivated by anti-corruption politics.
I am not calling them white grievance politics. It is a term political scientists, analysis, and pundit use all the time. You can literally type the word into Google and tons of articles come up regarding the issue and other phrases for the same phenomena.
If you think it is in reality narrow-minded to use the commonly used terms but the people that write about the subject, I don't know what to tell you. That seems incredibly silly to me.
And no, it comes nowhere close to calling someone a proud boy.
I just suspect you are doing that thing where you nitpick and pearl clutch at something you see a progressive saying because of your own petty grievances with progressives
I am not interested in another Healthinspector NT therapy session famb
I get what he is sayingThis actually isn't one of those times where I'm trying to "gaslight" progressive people... I think
You're whole "what Dave's saying is wrong and untrue except that one part" is just not true
If you disagree with what he's saying, fine
But it's also fine that maybe youre not really getting what he's saying
wrong thread…?