- 34,861
- 26,511
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
I honestly think shumpert is gonna be our starting SG by February if not opening day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Only way that happens is if he does what Landry beginning of last season. Lets not forget how Pringles juggled the line up at the start. Fields was all intangibles. Iman is gonna have to show great decision making, rebounding, and defense to start.Originally Posted by Ballinsam23
I honestly think shumpert is gonna be our starting SG by February if not opening day
If your gonna sit here and act like I said let's use our clause on Stat right now I refuse to continue this coversation with you . What I WAS saying is that maybe just maybe this clause is a little too valuable to use it on Ronaldo Balkman knowing that we can use it at anytime on anybody during this 10 year CBA (6 if the players or NBA opt-out) . Stoudemire has been basically reliable and injury free since the surgery minus his eye but at the end of the day this clause is great insurance and can be used on anyone no matter what they make. All i'm saying is that in Sports anything can happen injury wise to anybody (see Allan Houston , Brandon Roy , Grant Hill , Penny, Etc.) it would be smart for us to hold on to it instead of wasting it on a garbage player likke Balkman or Rautins just to get a third max. Nobody is saying Stat is gonna cripple our franchise with a career ending back or knee injury but when you invest 100 million in a player (goes for Melo too) them getting a sprain or rolling over a ankle worries me and when you have insurance like the amnesty clause you should consider just putting it aside just to be on the safe side.Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
Originally Posted by Cyber Smoke
You remember Brandon Roy right ? Nasty injuries that end careers happen in the NBA take off your blinders b. As a Knicks fan you should understand , Allan Houston held us hostage for years because of his knee I bet you wish we could have used an amnesty clause thenOriginally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
We honestly should've sent dude overseas or to the d-league.
At this point we do not need T-Mac.![]()
@ thinking of using the amnesty on Stat because of back issues. Amnesty a 100 mil contract, really?
Nobody is saying Stat is not gonna be able to play through his contract relatively injury free but at the end of the day he is a caution because of the microfracture surgery , also the back spasms he had this past postseason can happen again stop being oblivious to his health concerns because he's in blue and orange . Let's also not act like Mike Dantoni' is not his coach.![]()
What blinders? Stat just got that injury in the playoffs? What kinda idiot would think of cutting him when you don't know his current condition? When was the last time his knee injury was a problem? How you trying to compare Brandon Roy to STAT when it comes to injuries? Anybody who is smart in NBA management does not consider cutting STAT unless injuries become a constant. Yeah it should be on his mind but dude is not Mr. Glass. You reference Brandon Roy I can just bring up Grant Hill. And no, I wanted Allan Houston to retire a Knick. The problem surrounding him was we had a dumb GM that offered him superstar money when he clearly wasn't one but even if we did cut him given who was in charge at the time we would've squandered that money on Clarence Weatherspoon and Vin Baker anyway. So you can save it with the what if bull %+@#
Anything can happen, stop being pessimistic and speculative. Melo could tear his ACL. Chauncey could pull a muscle in both legs. Landry Fields could suffer from explosive diarrhea all season.
What does Pringles have to do with this? He worked STAT last season because he HAD to. Now with Melo, I highly doubt dude will be logging minutes like he did last season.
Bottom line, considering to use the amnesty clause on STAT now is stupid STOOPID, especially when we should be getting rid of Balkman. Pulling that move now would be all bad for the Knicks. Unnecessarily rock the boat. Have any of the FA superstars look at the Knicks sideways cuz now they only got 1 go to guy. Concern for Stat and his health when it comes to moving him should come around when there's 2 years left on his contract at the earliest. Yall sound like dumbasses talking about move STAT or cut him after the season we just had, just because we just got Melo.
Originally Posted by Al3xis
Amare post-microfracture surgery..
82 games
79
53
82
78
and the 53 was due to his EYE injury.
Micro-fracture surgery has proved to be a completely irrelevant topic when discussing Amare.
If he has back issues, that's a concern. Otherwise? Amare appears to keep himself in awesome condition.
Originally Posted by airmaxpenny1
Also as the Summer has developed I'm more and more disgruntled with the Shumpert pick, there were so many better options at that point.
Nice back tracking. It's obvious you didn't read my post. Happy those facts about Stat's reliability and consistency after the surgery shut you up. Cuz before you were trying to compare STAT's surgery to Roy's "career ending" injury, calling him a "caution" because of his surgery all those years ago. Makes me wonder if you've even seen dude play and to think you were calling me oblivious to his health and like I said Pringles has nothing to do with this but go ahead and cross everything I said out and not read itOriginally Posted by Cyber Smoke
If your gonna sit here and act like I said let's use our clause on Stat right now I refuse to continue this coversation with you . What I WAS saying is that maybe just maybe this clause is a little too valuable to use it on Ronaldo Balkman knowing that we can use it at anytime on anybody during this 10 year CBA (6 if the players or NBA opt-out) . Stoudemire has been basically reliable and injury free since the surgery minus his eye but at the end of the day this clause is great insurance and can be used on anyone no matter what they make. All i'm saying is that in Sports anything can happen injury wise to anybody (see Allan Houston , Brandon Roy , Grant Hill , Penny, Etc.) it would be smart for us to hold on to it instead of wasting it on a garbage player likke Balkman or Rautins just to get a third max. Nobody is saying Stat is gonna cripple our franchise with a career ending back or knee injury but when you invest 100 million in a player (goes for Melo too) them getting a sprain or rolling over a ankle worries me and when you have insurance like the amnesty clause you should consider just putting it aside just to be on the safe side.
Almost immediately after David Stern and Billy Hunter announced an agreement in principle on a deal to end the lockout, the free agency questions came pouring into my inbox, Twitter mentions column and the Fix Facebook page.
But before you all get back into your giddy froth of considering using all of the tools in the new agreement to sign every 7-footer with a beating heart to fill a need at center, let's get the reset on the Knicks' payroll situation for the impending 2011-12 season.
[Feels good to get back to talking about this stuff, doesn't it?]
From what I've been told, the NBA will maintain last season's salary cap setttings, with a $58.044 million cap and a $70.4 million luxury tax threshold.
The Knicks have seven players signed to guaranteed contracts (though they won't see all of this money as a result of the truncated schedule, the league will use their original totals to determine cap space).
GUARANTEED CONTRACTS FOR 2011-12:
Carmelo Anthony: $18,518,574
Amar'e Stoudemire: $18,217,705
Chauncey Billups: $14,200,000
Ronny Turiaf: $4,360,000 (NOTE: already picked up his player option)
Renaldo Balkman: $1,675,000
Toney Douglas: $1,145,640
Bill Walker: $916,000
TOTAL: $59,033019
NON-GUARANTEED CONTRACTS:
*- (After CBA is finalized, Knicks will have window to waive either without penalty)
Landry Fields: $788,872
Andy Rautins: $788,872
UNSIGNED DRAFT PICKS:
Iman Shumpert (2011 first round pick)
Josh Harrellson (2011 second round pick)
Jerome Jordan (2010 second round pick)
RESTRICTED FREE AGENTS
Derrick Brown $1,059,293 (qualifying offer)
CBA OUTLOOK:
The Knicks will be slightly over the cap, but well under the luxury tax threshold, which means they will have the full Mid-Level Exception (four years, $5 million per) at their disposal if they want to use it. Smart thinking here says they will NOT use it because they will not want to do anything that cuts into their salary cap space for 2012. The Knicks have just over $42 million in guaranteed contracts for three players in 2012, which means they'll have just about $16 million to spend on an entire roster. And that doesn't include Shumpert's rookie salary. So they will need to preserve every single penny if they hope to be in the game for Chris Paul, Deron Williams or Dwight Howard.
Expect the Knicks to focus on recruiting veteran's minimum-type players this year, which means they probably won't come away with any true impact players. However, it will be interesting to watch what players may become available with the Amnesty provision, as those players may be looking to for big profile opportunities. The most intriguing name to watch here is Brandon Roy, whose knee issues have reduced him to a role player and may motivate the Trail Blazers to get cap relief for the $70 million left on his deal over the next four years. Would Roy, who will be paid his entire salary from the Blazers, consider a one-year, veterans minimum to come to New York and fill the two-guard position next to Billups and alongside Anthony and Stoudemire?
As for the Knicks, don't expect them to use the Amnesty right now. Though some might feel using it to dump Balkman would save small change on a relatively useless player, the Knicks are better served pocketing this as insurance. Teams can use the Amnesty provision once over the life of the new CBA, but it can only be used for contracts that were signed under the old CBA by the current team.
For those anticipating an extend-and-trade for Chris Paul, you first have to consider that the Knicks have very little to offer the New Orleans Hornets and, unlike the Carmelo trade, there is no urgency here for either side. The new CBA says a player will lose his Bird Rights as part of a sign-and-trade or an extend-and-trade, which means there is no financial benefit for Paul to push for this the way Carmelo did. Plus, the new CBA now limits extensions to a total of three years (two if there is an option year left in the current contract) when done as part of a trade. Paul can sign for a maximum of four years as a free agent.
And for the Knicks, they shouldn't give up the few assets you have -- especially Shumpert -- for a player you can sign in the summer.
But that's assuming the Knicks have their entire focus on Paul. There is the option of wooing Patrick Ewing's star pupil, Dwight Howard, to New York to form what might be the greatest frontcourt trio since Bird, McHale and Parrish. Then the Knicks could fill the point guard position by either re-signing Billups to an affordable number or by using the Mid-Level Exception to sign Steve Nash to run the point.
So, yes, the new CBA provides the Knicks some options for 2012 if they are smart with their money in 2011. So, now that you have all the information, what would you do?
Roy would be nice, but like everyone has said, we need to focus on that FC badly.