- 91,025
- 124,821
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
I might be alone on this, but I think Bynum is just a !@%!%#$ as opposed to being young and immature.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by MJGREATXII
Does anybody realistically think we'll be a different team next year?
We have Jim buss and Mitch feeding us the same crap that this core can still win.
Like Ska has said, I truly believe we're on our way to mediocrity. The same mediocrity that we were in the 90s.
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Dwight definitely has the skills, no doubt... but he's not a franchise guy. That's what he has proven these last couple years.
Is there a team (not us fans; the team) that doesn't want him? Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnope. If he comes out today and says "I want to play in ______, period. The end," that team goes bananas and does what it has to in order to get him.
But just like that ultra-hot escort that burned you, a few years down the road you're really going to regret signing up for that.
So as fans, lettuce be glad he said 'Nets,' not 'Lakers'. Because I definitely believe the turmoil he has caused in ORL trumps his impressive numbers.
And even the numbers... I remember Stan Van Gundy at a postgame press conference one time asking something like "How does a 7-footer only get *insert small number here* rebounds? I mean... how does that happen?" And I remember thinking "Ummmm... good point."
And if I remember correctly, the next night he got like 20 boards, but still, SVG was right. We don't need that. The locker room disruption, the splitting apart of upper management, the 'sometimes' effort on the court... all of that together refutes hus on-court production.
Not saying he's a villain, but definitely too immature to be a franchise guy, even though he'll get paid like one and 'poster boy'-ed like one.
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Dwight definitely has the skills, no doubt... but he's not a franchise guy. That's what he has proven these last couple years.
Is there a team (not us fans; the team) that doesn't want him? Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnope. If he comes out today and says "I want to play in ______, period. The end," that team goes bananas and does what it has to in order to get him.
But just like that ultra-hot escort that burned you, a few years down the road you're really going to regret signing up for that.
So as fans, lettuce be glad he said 'Nets,' not 'Lakers'. Because I definitely believe the turmoil he has caused in ORL trumps his impressive numbers.
And even the numbers... I remember Stan Van Gundy at a postgame press conference one time asking something like "How does a 7-footer only get *insert small number here* rebounds? I mean... how does that happen?" And I remember thinking "Ummmm... good point."
And if I remember correctly, the next night he got like 20 boards, but still, SVG was right. We don't need that. The locker room disruption, the splitting apart of upper management, the 'sometimes' effort on the court... all of that together refutes hus on-court production.
Not saying he's a villain, but definitely too immature to be a franchise guy, even though he'll get paid like one and 'poster boy'-ed like one.
Originally Posted by Essential1
Sessions is a cheaper better player than Calderon.
Betterscorer, shooter,rebounder,defender.
Calderon is a slightly better passer.
presequel:
If we're gonna call out Dwight for having low rebounding games, or off nights.....let's compare with Bynum who I'm willing to bet has more, and is just as immature.
Ummmm... you new to the thread, bro?We've been calling Bynum out for inconsistent play & immaturity. Difference is... he's already a Laker. We're not talking about someone who might be brought in.
Originally Posted by SoHi 23
if the Lakers signed/trade Javele McGee over the Derrick Williams, I would be furious.
I really like what Sessions brings, but we use him so wrong that we might as well as get rid of him. Remember the first couple of week we had him and he was allowed to play how he wantedOriginally Posted by kobe8is
Originally Posted by Essential1
Sessions is a cheaper better player than Calderon.
Betterscorer, shooter,rebounder,defender.
Calderon is a slightly better passer.
and Calderon is a much better passer!
Originally Posted by sorianotron
Originally Posted by SoHi 23
if the Lakers signed/trade Javele McGee over the Derrick Williams, I would be furious.
expand on that...
Dont really see the value in D.Will?
This goes to the fact that Mike Brown is a HELL of a defensive minded ASST coach.... Terrible head coachOriginally Posted by E3LAL
I really like what Sessions brings, but we use him so wrong that we might as well as get rid of him. Remember the first couple of week we had him and he was allowed to play how he wantedOriginally Posted by kobe8is
Originally Posted by Essential1
Sessions is a cheaper better player than Calderon.
Betterscorer, shooter,rebounder,defender.
Calderon is a slightly better passer.
and Calderon is a much better passer!