Nigeria bans gay marriage, gay meetings -- Does so secretly

[sundoobie]

They aren't ignorant.  


Definition of Ignorant: Lack of knowledge or information.


My viewpoint is based on knowledge, fact, and information.  I am the opposite of ignorant. 

And they are also NOT bisexual. So if you're wrong about THAT, which post of yours since page 21 is based of knowledge, fact and information?

 

[heliumclinton]

Wrong.  You are the ones trying to change society.  What is the federal law when it comes to gay marriage?

The federal law is the federal government must honor valid same sex marriage even if they couple now lives in a state that it is illegal.

 

[nako xl]

 

 

 

Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?

The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 

What percentage of the population views homosexual behavior as vile? I'd like an up to date statistic. 

53%.  The majority.

His opinion is of the minority.  HE is actually the one trying to change society.  He'd never admit that though.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

so 4% away from his opinion being seen as abnormal? 

that was a typo 53% support gay marriage.  his opinion is the minority.

 

[rhythm808]

 

[rhythm808]

You're done here. The members of this NT society believe you're a bigot, a hateful scumbag, a troll, and a generally detestable individual.

You disagree? Prove it to me?

Prove homosexuals are normal and not vile.  The burden of proof is on you. 

 

[rhythm808]

The federal law is the federal government must honor valid same sex marriage even if they couple now lives in a state that it is illegal.

That is not true.  What is the federal law?

 

[rhythm808]

And they are also NOT bisexual. So if you're wrong about THAT, which post of yours since page 21 is based of knowledge, fact and information?

They are bisexual.  They had sexual activities with the same sex in addition to the opposite sex.  That makes them bisexual.  Heterosexuals only have sexual activities with the opposite sex. 

 

[rhythm808]

 
that was a typo 53% support gay marriage.  his opinion is the minority.

What is the federal law?

 

[boris]

 

 
53%.  The majority.

His opinion is of the minority.  HE is actually the one trying to change society.  He'd never admit that though.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

Wrong.  You are the ones trying to change society.  What is the federal law when it comes to gay marriage?

lol troll confirmed. Move along everyone. 

 

[nako xl]

 

 
that was a typo 53% support gay marriage.  his opinion is the minority.

What is the federal law?

i dont think you know what you're talking about. i can't answer your question beause... well i know you don't know what you're talking about.

 

what is this?

 

[heliumclinton]

And they are also NOT bisexual. So if you're wrong about THAT, which post of yours since page 21 is based of knowledge, fact and information?

They are bisexual.  They had sexual activities with the same sex in addition to the opposite sex.  That makes them bisexual.  Heterosexuals only have sexual activities with the opposite sex. 

It's sad you don't even know the definition of heterosexual and homosexual, which have nothing to do with the act of sex. People have sex with people they aren't attracted to all the time.

 

[rhythm808]

 
lol troll confirmed. Move along everyone. 

And how is this troll confirmed?  I'm not a troll.  What is the federal law?  You like to ignore questions and post statements that are based on nothing but your convictions.  You are textbook.

".. .by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean... conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media." "...our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof." – Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, 1989, page 153.

 

[lobotomybeats]

 
Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.

You understand oppression, right?  You are saying the majority should always be the ruling class.  What's the point in any activism then?  Should the oppressed just be resigned to their fate? Should Richard and Midred Loving have just sucked it up?    You will arrogantly say "but their actions don't change anything."  That wasn't the belief before Loving v. Virginia though.  You will also make some childish snide remark about how homosexuals are abnormal deviants as if the majority of homophobes like yourself take into account brain differences before settling into their hatred.  

What kind of evidence do you want?  You're asking people who have no problem with homosexuality to give scientific evidence as to why they don't have a problem with homosexuality.  That's like me telling you to prove that I can't jump over a car. 

 

[hybridsoldier23]

You're done here. The members of this NT society believe you're a bigot, a hateful scumbag, a troll, and a generally detestable individual.


You disagree? Prove it to me?

Prove homosexuals are normal and not vile.  The burden of proof is on you. 

I'm going to ask you one more time to answer this and don't spout off with anything about homosexuality because honestly, I'm trying to understand this thought process of yours.

Society at one point also wanted to state that based on the color of your skin you were less of a human being than someone who was white. That's still a struggle TODAY because society at one point considered it acceptable. Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it? Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you? If that burden of proof is/was satisfied in your mind what did it take to satisfy that burden of proof?

 

[rhythm808]

 
marriage isn't a federal issue.  marriage laws are governed by state.

at least know what you're talking about please. 

(disclaimer: i noticed you dropped the left-handed brain biology thing the second i posted links to back up my having a degree on the topic.  hint - you don't want to argue law with me either.)

Okay, I was wrong about federal marriage.  I have been right about everything else.

In addition, I was born repulsed by homosexuality, so I can't control being repulsed by them anyway.  Like I said, this research was started after being bombarded with pro-gay propaganda and wanting to see if my born-with-feelings were founded. 

 

[nako xl]

 

 
lol troll confirmed. Move along everyone. 

And how is this troll confirmed?  I'm not a troll.  What is the federal law?  You like to ignore questions and post statements that are based on nothing but your convictions.  You are textbook.

".. .by conversion [toward public acceptance of homosexuality] we mean... conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media." "...our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof." – Kirk & Madsen, After the Ball, 1989, page 153.

 

 

 
A left-handed person is a person who writes with their left hand.  Otherwise they would just be a person. If being left-handed wasn't abnormal there'd be no designation for the group.

Homosexuality is vile and repulsive because gay people have sex with same sex partners.

Left handedness is vile and repulsive because left handed people write with their left hands.

If a right-handed person writes with their left-hand they therefore must be left-handed.

This is disgusting.

Wrong.  So I am left handed because I type with both my left and right hand?

The underlined would be impossible since you already referred to them as right handed.  In addition, they only right with their left hand when their right hand is injured or tired.

Heterosexuals never participate in homosexual activities. You aren't close to raising a comparable argument. 

You keep saing "type" when I said write.  Funny that you keep trying to spin things.  All part of your agenda.

A left-handed person is a person who writes with their left hand.  Otherwise they would just be a person. If being left-handed wasn't abnormal there'd be no designation for the group.

Homosexuality is vile and repulsive because gay people have sex with same sex partners.

Left handedness is vile and repulsive because left handed people write with their left hands.

If a right-handed person writes with their left-hand they therefore must be left-handed.

 

 

Like I said, Society has seen homosexual behavior as vile, and deviant.  You are the ones trying to convince society that it isn't, to change the rules of society.  That means it is up to you to prove that they aren't vile....because they are already considered vile.?

The burden of proof is on you to scientifically prove they aren't vile.  Go ahead.  Prove they are the same as everyone else. 

What percentage of the population views homosexual behavior as vile? I'd like an up to date statistic. 

53% support gay marriage.  The majority.

His opinion is of the minority.  HE is actually the one trying to change society.  He'd never admit that though.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

Why are you avoiding these posts?

 

[rhythm808]

I'm going to ask you one more time to answer this and don't spout off with anything about homosexuality because honestly, I'm trying to understand this thought process of yours.

Society at one point also wanted to state that based on the color of your skin you were less of a human being than someone who was white. That's still a struggle TODAY because society at one point considered it acceptable. Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it? Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you? If that burden of proof is/was satisfied in your mind what did it take to satisfy that burden of proof?

There is no scientific evidence showing races are inferior or abnormal. 

 

[Nawzlew]

 

[deleted]

Why are you avoiding these posts?

He avoided the studies on handedness too.

 

[rhythm808]

 
Why are you avoiding these posts?

I never ignored them.  I typed responses on the last page and was wrong about the federal law on gay marriage because it was changed last year.  (you changed society).  



This is on the same page of the study that you linked.  What people believe the effect will be of legalizing gays and labeling them as non-deviants. 

 

[nako xl]

 

 
Why are you avoiding these posts?

I never ignored them.  I typed responses on the last page and was wrong about the federal law on gay marriage because it was changed last year.  (you changed society).  



This is on the same page of the study that you linked.  What people believe the effect will be of legalizing gays and labeling them as non-deviants. 

post a link.  Not just your word.

And address my posts.

 

[rhythm808]

He avoided the studies on handedness too.

 Their behavior is the same.  Left handed people use both their right and left hand in the SAME activities conducted by right handed people.  Gay people conduct new, different behavior.  They aren't comparable. 

Even though left handed people have one portion is larger,it doesn't cause new behavior, and is not comparable. 

 

[rhythm808]

 
post a link.  Not just your word.

And address my posts.

I did.  But you keep editing your posts after I read them the first time.

It is the study that YOU posted.  Okay, let me go look through YOUR posts....

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

Why can't we use typing?  Why does it have to be writing? 

 

[nako xl]

 

 
Why are you avoiding these posts?

I never ignored them.  I typed responses on the last page and was wrong about the federal law on gay marriage because it was changed last year.  (you changed society). 

Left-handedness correlates with developmental disorders. Left handed people are the minority.

Therefore left-handed people are biologically inferior.

Therefore in your opinion they do not deserve equal rights.

Correct?

 

[hybridsoldier23]

I'm going to ask you one more time to answer this and don't spout off with anything about homosexuality because honestly, I'm trying to understand this thought process of yours.


Society at one point also wanted to state that based on the color of your skin you were less of a human being than someone who was white. That's still a struggle TODAY because society at one point considered it acceptable. Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it? Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you? If that burden of proof is/was satisfied in your mind what did it take to satisfy that burden of proof?

There is no scientific evidence showing races are inferior or abnormal. 

You're coming back to science when the CORE of your argument is about how society is the reason why there's this "burden of proof". As we've continually gone over society is a matter of opinion and not fact. If you want to get into science, when it was acceptable to degrade other races there was PUBLISHED scientific evidence that other races were believed to be inferior. There are still people that will disgustingly point fingers to this and rattle off statistics about how minorities are ruining America.

Why won't you answer these questions I'm laying out for you?

Do other races need to continually prove that they're equal to whites for you to believe it? Is every day a need for those races to satisfy a burden of proof for you? If that burden of proof is/was satisfied in your mind what did it take to satisfy that burden of proof?