- 16,431
- 2,118
- Joined
- May 12, 2002
Barnes playing with Kyrie
Austin to Wolves
Austin to Wolves
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
Heard the Bobcats may be interested in moving the no.2 pick for Rudy. Just talk right now, but it could get interesting over the next few weeks.
MKG in Memphis
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
Heard the Bobcats may be interested in moving the no.2 pick for Rudy. Just talk right now, but it could get interesting over the next few weeks.
MKG in Memphis
Rudy Gay for the #2?! Yeah, can't see that happening.
MJ taking on Gay's contract?!?! oooooookOriginally Posted by Animal Thug1539
Rudy Gay for the #2?! Yeah, can't see that happeningOriginally Posted by bhzmafia14
Heard the Bobcats may be interested in moving the no.2 pick for Rudy. Just talk right now, but it could get interesting over the next few weeks.
MKG in Memphis.
Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
..I really hope Cavs GM is throwing smokescreens around with claiming they want Barnes.
Dude has bust written all over him. He was better off going pro last year. He didn't prove much this year except he can be average NBA player ala` Al Harrington.
UNC PF John Henson said his first workout will be Monday in Sacramento. Knows and likes Cousins. I could see Kings taking him at 5.
— JasonJones (@mr_jasonjones) June 7, 2012
Daring picks that can pay off
By Doug Gottlieb | ESPN Insider
With the NBA draft lottery order set and Chad Ford's most recent mock draft released, it's a good time to take a closer look at some of this year's highest-touted prospects. Because I've seen these players throughout their college careers, I'm more skeptical of a few when it comes to their NBA potential. Here is a look at five players I would be leery of taking, with a better alternative pick whom teams should consider.
1. Don't take Michael Kidd-Gilchrist ...
MKG is a phenomenal competitor, and his tenacious drive to help a team win has many thinking he can change the culture of his first NBA team. My opinion of MKG is not truly negative. In fact, I totally understand the value in finding a big-time competitor early in his growth curve. On the other hand, it is fairly obvious to most that MKG is not a true guard yet.
In the days ahead, Kidd-Gilchrist will devote his time to learning the nuances of being a guard in addition to practicing his work-in-progress jumper. In many ways MKG is a bigger, worse ball-handling, better-rebounding version of Tony Allen. People forget that Allen was a scoring machine -- minus a jump shot -- out of Oklahoma State. Allen, like MKG, has a flawed jumper but is a ferocious competitor. If an Allen clone is your idea of a top 2-guard draft pick, at least you know what you are getting.
... instead, take Jeremy Lamb
Lamb had an up-and-down season after being a huge part of UConn's national championship team in 2010-11. But most important for his future is that his ability to shoot, score and move without the ball, combined with his length and height, makes him an ideal wing draft pick.
Gottlieb and I are on the same page for the most part. He has White top 5 on his draft board and thinks Lamb will more than likely be a star in the league. I don't quite agree with his MKG/TA comparison, mainly because MKG has something that TA didn't have coming out of college. Size. And I don't think MKG's ball handling is worse than TA's. I actually think its on par with most SF's in the league.
Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
If Barnes has to score 18-20 PPG for your team, your team is in the lottery.
If we are trading down, I want Terrenece Jones....Originally Posted by Kevin Cleveland
Really like the Henson to Sacramento thought. Seems like they will decide between him and Drummond.
Originally Posted by Buc Em
I think a hybrid of Granger and Deng is a solid comparison for Barnes, but he had more talent and hype than either one of them coming out of high school so he may end up surpassing that. In a draft with only one sure fire star I don't know how you can ask for much more out of a guy going outside the top 3. Like Rivers, Beal and Lamb I think his game is more built for the NBA than college. He would be a solid %#! pick for the Cavs, I don't know why Cavs fans wouldn't want him. I like Lamb but he has a lot more bust potential than Barnes.
Jeff Goodman
Originally Posted by DIOR PAINT
Originally Posted by Buc Em
I think a hybrid of Granger and Deng is a solid comparison for Barnes, but he had more talent and hype than either one of them coming out of high school so he may end up surpassing that. In a draft with only one sure fire star I don't know how you can ask for much more out of a guy going outside the top 3. Like Rivers, Beal and Lamb I think his game is more built for the NBA than college. He would be a solid %#! pick for the Cavs, I don't know why Cavs fans wouldn't want him. I like Lamb but he has a lot more bust potential than Barnes.
Harrison Barnes definitely was not better than Luol Deng coming out of HS.