- 4,751
- 2,232
16 Curry
14 KD
13 Bron
Undoubtly had better seasons that Russ this year. By every almost every measure.
KD 32 7 5
Curry 30 5 6
Bron 26 6 8
Russ 31 10 10
clearly the measures you are referring to are not points, rebounds and assists
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
16 Curry
14 KD
13 Bron
Undoubtly had better seasons that Russ this year. By every almost every measure.
You have ZERO objectivity on this subject.
KD 32 7 5
Curry 30 5 6
Bron 26 6 8
Russ 31 10 10
clearly the measures you are referring to are not points, rebounds and assists
Not the Spurs.This.
If I had a vote, I'm going with Westbrook. I thought OKC for sure was going to miss the playoffs after losing KD. Take Russ off and that team is headed to the lottery.
You could say that about any team with one star player.
He still won 50 games that season
[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]using raw stats to form your argument [emoji]127997[/emoji]
jesus christ
The Suns were the #1 and #2 seeds in the West the years Nash won. The criteria might be arbitrary but its pretty damn ironclad.So now it's 50 games? Bob MaCadoo won it in 75 winning 49 games. And Nash also didn't have a top 3 record? Another exception. Like I said there's no iron clad rule or criteria. Just whatever the media arbitrarily comes up with.
So now it's 50 games? Bob MCadoo won it in 75 winning 49 games. And Nash also didn't have a top 3 record? Another exception. Like I said there's no iron clad rule or criteria. Just whatever the media arbitrarily comes up with.
So now it's 50 games? Bob MCadoo won it in 75 winning 49 games. And Nash also didn't have a top 3 record? Another exception. Like I said there's no iron clad rule or criteria. Just whatever the media arbitrarily comes up with.
I do...
One thing about me....I can hate on a player for a myriad of reasons....but I won't front on them from an objective standpoint. I just won't
16 Curry 14KD and 13 Bron had the rare combination of team success and equally as mindblowing stats....with far greater effiecenfy and less usage (and less stat hunting)
Is there a cutoff for you for the amount of wins his team has to have?
48 I think. That would require them to go 10-5 down the stretch. That's a 7 game drop off from last season, likely a 5 seed and having a historic season all while losing the 2nd best player in the world from the year before.
if we're gonna factor in Usage & team records into this don't you think some slack should be given that all three you mentioned were playing with future HOF'ers in their prime's & russ second best player was a sixth man to Evan Fournier last year?
As far as stat stuffing, his is no more egregious than any other superstar who does it, and his "stat padding" leads to a winning percentage of 80%. his usage isn't a choice it's necessary in order for him to keep his team in the game.
There's gotta be a stat somewhere showing Harden's numbers if he had 42% usage
14 KD put that Thunder team on his back.....while Russ was missing games and trying to recover from an injury.
Russ stat padding is much more egregious than other star players. Much much more. Even the Westbrook fans can admit this.
That ***** LeBron really COULD average a triple double if he wanted to. Think about that for a second.
14 KD put that Thunder team on his back.....while Russ was missing games and trying to recover from an injury.
Russ stat padding is much more egregious than other star players. Much much more. Even the Westbrook fans can admit this.
That ***** LeBron really COULD average a triple double if he wanted to. Think about that for a second.