- 37,477
- 31,753
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
They're printing money over there they need to stop it. Especially after KD did what he did
true that. And they getting that new arena.
"Payyy chimmm his moneyyyyy."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They're printing money over there they need to stop it. Especially after KD did what he did
but he blew the hell up in Denver. He was a household name in Denver. Perfect storm.
Its not about being a household name to fans like us who follow the NBA. My Mom knew who Melo was and she doesn't even watch the NBA.
That's not the point man. He's a BIGGER star in New York. Chris Paul was a star in New Orleans. He was a BIGGER star in LA.
I wonder if Iggy would reconsider returning to Philly. He'd be a great veteran leader for this team man
Perhaps, but the off the court money in LA > *
is it though? i think thats 20 years ago. If you are good, you are going to make money off the court regardless. Whats he going to get in LA that he can;t elsewhere? Endorsements will be there if you're a star.
So......lemme get this straight........he caught a case? And intends to defend himself?Studying so he can file his appeal.where's the collector to make sense of all this and distract us with posts about john wall's gravity??
People keep saying "winning in NY" will make players a bigger star than winning elsewhere. There is zero proof of this. The last time there was a superstar winning in New York, the world and culture around superstars and endorsements was so different, that you cannot definitively say that in todays day it makes a difference. Cant compare how superstars were treated in the 90s to how they are now.OK, good talk bud.Being a winning star in L.A. and nyc isn't the same as winning and being a star in Indiana or CharlotteThere is a debate. What the rest of us are saying is that with the advent of national TV and social media, this whole notion of having to end up in a big market is completely overblown.
All I'm seeing are blanket statements with no concrete examples.
What objective proof do you have of this?
What objective proof do you have of this?
Chris Paul was making 4 mil a year in endorsements his last year in New Orleans. He was at 8.5 last year with the Clippers.
Melo was at 5-6 million his last year in Denver. He has been at 8 in New York.
Sorry guys but the real Collector is locked up. He's handed the reigns over to me to update his status. He says all 31 teams except Washington is cotton candy soft. Especially the Cowboys, Giants and Eagles. HTTR
Also wanted to get a message to some DC guy about a bet. Said bet will be paid upon his release and return proper. Hopefully sooner then later.
How much of this is attributable to the social media climate change since these two have moved?
Cp sadI am hearing Paul george to the clips...
I am hearing Paul george to the clips...
People keep saying "winning in NY" will make players a bigger star than winning elsewhere. There is zero proof of this. The last time there was a superstar winning in New York, the world and culture around superstars and endorsements was so different, that you cannot definitively say that in todays day it makes a difference. Cant compare how superstars were treated in the 90s to how they are now.
I am hearing Paul george to the clips...
How much of this is attributable to the social media climate change since these two have moved?
Social media changed in 1 year? Melo was at 5-6 pre Knicks, his 1st year with New York he goes up to 8.
Same with Chris Paul the year prior to going to LA he was at 4. 2012 he went to 6. And has continued to build his brand since. There wasn't that much social media revolution in a year to account for that.