- 9,996
- 200
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2004
I didn't see anyone locking up Durant or dallas would have won the game.Originally Posted by SneakerPro
Originally Posted by franchise3
Originally Posted by dmbrhs
There's a difference between outplaying someone versus some guy (and team) hitting almost everything in the fourth quarter. Zombies couldn't miss in the 4th. They were all jacking up stuff and it was going in. Dallas was in that game and playing fine.
Half glass full, OKC's BENCH MOB were lights out, and Dallas was still in the game, or, half glass empty, how Dallas get got by OKC's bench the entire fourth, though?
If somebody posted before the game, Westbrook won't play the whole 4th quarter, and the Thunder win anyway, we all stoneface and laugh.
But that's what the Thunder did. No Russy in the 4th and still got the W.
Going forward, good luck trying to guard Harden. Whoever you put on Harden, ie, Stevenson, who's gonna guard KD? KD will just light it up then. Bring in Brewer, he's almost as bad as Stevenson on the offensive end. All this, and there's still Westbrook, who rebounded from his 3-15 shooting woes from Game 1. Like I said on page 3 or whatever, unlike the Lakers, OKC has too many guys you actually have to defend.
I expect the Thunder to win the next 2. Quote me.
Ehh Kidd locked up Durant as much as Stevenson