DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,493
- 53,680
Originally Posted by AllenIversonFan01
looks like we wont have to deal with the spitter any more. Lookin more and more like the east is back to a 2 team race.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by AllenIversonFan01
looks like we wont have to deal with the spitter any more. Lookin more and more like the east is back to a 2 team race.
Originally Posted by Proshares
I think Archer will be a solid #3 one day. Outside of that, more depth players than impact players IMO. Gave up a bigger number of kids rather than a blue chipper. Good for them to do it now before Tampa falls out and you have teams offering up better packages in July. A lot of right handed power in that division so he helps.
DJ's, I honestly think it depends. Raffy was never a top tier player in the league or at his position so that doesn't work well in his case either. But, I think he gets in eventually because the stats are just too gaudy. When you think about it, the voters will change in 10 years or so to folks who have different opinions on the roid era than the geezers who vote now. I think Bonds will get in because before his supposed use, he was a borderline HOF'er to begin with. Clemens I think is never getting in. You think about before he came to Toronto and used to recover from injuries, was he a sure fire HOF pitcher in Boston? Great seasons sure, but as a whole? I think A-Rod gets in as well. Sosa will never get in. I just don't think he was that great of a player TBH. Sheff might.
HOF is my biggest issue in MLB for some reason and some writers and their articles annoy the hell out of me. I don't see how Jack Morris is a HOF'er for example. Edgar should be in. Bagwell got absolutely HOSED IMO. Deny him because of suspicion when he's clearly denied all wrong doing his entire career and never tested positive or appeared on the Mitchell Report or in Canseco's book. Because he worked out too much. Good lesson for kids, work out too much and too hard for your goals and we're going to put you in a group of cheaters. Raines should be in. Trammell should be in. So should Larkin.
Originally Posted by Proshares
I think Archer will be a solid #3 one day. Outside of that, more depth players than impact players IMO. Gave up a bigger number of kids rather than a blue chipper. Good for them to do it now before Tampa falls out and you have teams offering up better packages in July. A lot of right handed power in that division so he helps.
DJ's, I honestly think it depends. Raffy was never a top tier player in the league or at his position so that doesn't work well in his case either. But, I think he gets in eventually because the stats are just too gaudy. When you think about it, the voters will change in 10 years or so to folks who have different opinions on the roid era than the geezers who vote now. I think Bonds will get in because before his supposed use, he was a borderline HOF'er to begin with. Clemens I think is never getting in. You think about before he came to Toronto and used to recover from injuries, was he a sure fire HOF pitcher in Boston? Great seasons sure, but as a whole? I think A-Rod gets in as well. Sosa will never get in. I just don't think he was that great of a player TBH. Sheff might.
HOF is my biggest issue in MLB for some reason and some writers and their articles annoy the hell out of me. I don't see how Jack Morris is a HOF'er for example. Edgar should be in. Bagwell got absolutely HOSED IMO. Deny him because of suspicion when he's clearly denied all wrong doing his entire career and never tested positive or appeared on the Mitchell Report or in Canseco's book. Because he worked out too much. Good lesson for kids, work out too much and too hard for your goals and we're going to put you in a group of cheaters. Raines should be in. Trammell should be in. So should Larkin.
Bernie won't get in right away, but eventually he'll be there. As should Pettite, regardless of the Mitchell Report.Originally Posted by Proshares
That's another thing, it's going to be VERY interesting to say the least when a player like Greg Maddux appears on the ballot. If he's not getting 100% it'll create a lot of controversey.
Another interesting case is Bernie Williams. As much as you all hate it and as much as it should not be taken into consideration in the voting process, that Yankee aura/mold/era he played in is going to play a big part.
Bernie won't get in right away, but eventually he'll be there. As should Pettite, regardless of the Mitchell Report.Originally Posted by Proshares
That's another thing, it's going to be VERY interesting to say the least when a player like Greg Maddux appears on the ballot. If he's not getting 100% it'll create a lot of controversey.
Another interesting case is Bernie Williams. As much as you all hate it and as much as it should not be taken into consideration in the voting process, that Yankee aura/mold/era he played in is going to play a big part.
The parameters of the deal that ESPNChicago.com's Bruce Levine reported has Matt Garza headed to the Cubs in exchange for pitcher Chris Archer, outfielder Brandon Guyer, catcher Robinson Chirinos, shortstop Hak-Ju Lee and outfielder Sam Fuld. Minor league outfielder Fernando Perez will also head to Chicago with Garza.
http:///sports.espn.go.com/espn/gallery/enlargePhoto?id=5999106&story=5999067">http://sports.espn.go.com...999106&...idth=440,height=750,scrollbars=no,noresize'); return false;" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog?name=law_keith&id=5999067#">[+] Enlarge
Kim Klement/US PresswireGarza is a prize, and the Cubs paid like it.
Immediate reaction: Starting with the prospects, I love this trade for Tampa Bay. They got more for Garza than Kansas City did for Zack Greinke, although their package of players is, collectively, further away than what the Royals got. It looks to me like the Rays focused less on position and more on overall value.
Hak-Ju is the star of the deal for the Rays, a potential monster at shortstop who can run and throw and shows good feel for the strike zone. He performed very well as a 19-year-old in full-season ball and should remain at shortstop long-term because of his athleticism and feel for the position. He's a potential four-tool player who will probably top out with just average power; even though he should be fairly big for a shortstop by the time he fills out, it's not a swing path that's going to generate a lot of long fly balls, but he should hit for average and get on base while adding value through baserunning and defense. He was the No. 1 prospect in the Cubs' system for me.
Archer was originally in the Cleveland system and went to the Cubs in the Mark Derosa trade; at the time, he was all arm strength with little command, but has made huge strides in that area. He'll pitch at 93-95 MPH and despite a high slot, he throws an above-average slider that has missed bats in the minor leagues. His changeup remains a fringe-average pitch but there's enough there to think he'll stick as a three-pitch starter, with the absolute worst case scenario of an impact reliever if for some reason the command stops improving.
The remaining players are all interesting pieces, none good enough to headline a deal but all worthwhile as extra parts.
Brandon Guyer is a plus runner and defender in centerfield with good bat-to-ball skills but poor plate discipline; he mashed as a 24-year-old repeating Double-A, so he may be overrated on performance, but the tools are there for him to at least be a second-division regular because of the glove and speed.
Chirinos is a recent convert to catching -- 2010 was the first year he played nowhere but behind the dish -- and projects to stay behind the plate; his offense the last two years has been inflated by his age relative to league, but the standard at catcher is so low that it seems hard to believe he can't be a starter for someone in the majors. Sam Fuld is a fourth/fifth outfielder who is never going to hit like he did in 2009 again, but has value on the bench and as a late-game OBP weapon against a right-handed reliever.
For the Cubs, it's pretty clear the trade makes the team better. Garza isn't an ace, but he has ace stuff, and taking him for the AL East -- he's notoriously been a Boston killer -- and plugging him into the weaker NL Central should improve his numbers across the board. I've seen him hit 97 in the 7th inning, and seeing the NL-version of 8-9 hitters won't lessen his chances to go deep into games. The Cubs rotation becomes really heavy on right-handed power stuff, and is better set to compete with the other starting staffs in the division, with the perpetual mystery of Carlos Zambrano always a huge piece of that equation. But at least now, any implosion from Big Z won't completely compromise the season.
The other positive here is the chance for the Cubs to let young Andrew Cashner work out of the bullpen. If Cashner is in the pen, they could have a pretty unbelievable group of power arms, and could have a lot of six-inning games.
Cubs fans will enjoy what Garza can offer, but this came at a huge cost.
The other big winner here is the Music Man, Jeremy Hellickson, who now seems guaranteed a spot in the Tampa rotation. Once there, he could contend for Rookie of the Year, so don't weep for the Rays.
The parameters of the deal that ESPNChicago.com's Bruce Levine reported has Matt Garza headed to the Cubs in exchange for pitcher Chris Archer, outfielder Brandon Guyer, catcher Robinson Chirinos, shortstop Hak-Ju Lee and outfielder Sam Fuld. Minor league outfielder Fernando Perez will also head to Chicago with Garza.
http:///sports.espn.go.com/espn/gallery/enlargePhoto?id=5999106&story=5999067">http://sports.espn.go.com...999106&...idth=440,height=750,scrollbars=no,noresize'); return false;" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/blog?name=law_keith&id=5999067#">[+] Enlarge
Kim Klement/US PresswireGarza is a prize, and the Cubs paid like it.
Immediate reaction: Starting with the prospects, I love this trade for Tampa Bay. They got more for Garza than Kansas City did for Zack Greinke, although their package of players is, collectively, further away than what the Royals got. It looks to me like the Rays focused less on position and more on overall value.
Hak-Ju is the star of the deal for the Rays, a potential monster at shortstop who can run and throw and shows good feel for the strike zone. He performed very well as a 19-year-old in full-season ball and should remain at shortstop long-term because of his athleticism and feel for the position. He's a potential four-tool player who will probably top out with just average power; even though he should be fairly big for a shortstop by the time he fills out, it's not a swing path that's going to generate a lot of long fly balls, but he should hit for average and get on base while adding value through baserunning and defense. He was the No. 1 prospect in the Cubs' system for me.
Archer was originally in the Cleveland system and went to the Cubs in the Mark Derosa trade; at the time, he was all arm strength with little command, but has made huge strides in that area. He'll pitch at 93-95 MPH and despite a high slot, he throws an above-average slider that has missed bats in the minor leagues. His changeup remains a fringe-average pitch but there's enough there to think he'll stick as a three-pitch starter, with the absolute worst case scenario of an impact reliever if for some reason the command stops improving.
The remaining players are all interesting pieces, none good enough to headline a deal but all worthwhile as extra parts.
Brandon Guyer is a plus runner and defender in centerfield with good bat-to-ball skills but poor plate discipline; he mashed as a 24-year-old repeating Double-A, so he may be overrated on performance, but the tools are there for him to at least be a second-division regular because of the glove and speed.
Chirinos is a recent convert to catching -- 2010 was the first year he played nowhere but behind the dish -- and projects to stay behind the plate; his offense the last two years has been inflated by his age relative to league, but the standard at catcher is so low that it seems hard to believe he can't be a starter for someone in the majors. Sam Fuld is a fourth/fifth outfielder who is never going to hit like he did in 2009 again, but has value on the bench and as a late-game OBP weapon against a right-handed reliever.
For the Cubs, it's pretty clear the trade makes the team better. Garza isn't an ace, but he has ace stuff, and taking him for the AL East -- he's notoriously been a Boston killer -- and plugging him into the weaker NL Central should improve his numbers across the board. I've seen him hit 97 in the 7th inning, and seeing the NL-version of 8-9 hitters won't lessen his chances to go deep into games. The Cubs rotation becomes really heavy on right-handed power stuff, and is better set to compete with the other starting staffs in the division, with the perpetual mystery of Carlos Zambrano always a huge piece of that equation. But at least now, any implosion from Big Z won't completely compromise the season.
The other positive here is the chance for the Cubs to let young Andrew Cashner work out of the bullpen. If Cashner is in the pen, they could have a pretty unbelievable group of power arms, and could have a lot of six-inning games.
Cubs fans will enjoy what Garza can offer, but this came at a huge cost.
The other big winner here is the Music Man, Jeremy Hellickson, who now seems guaranteed a spot in the Tampa rotation. Once there, he could contend for Rookie of the Year, so don't weep for the Rays.
Originally Posted by Proshares
I think Archer will be a solid #3 one day. Outside of that, more depth players than impact players IMO. Gave up a bigger number of kids rather than a blue chipper. Good for them to do it now before Tampa falls out and you have teams offering up better packages in July. A lot of right handed power in that division so he helps.
DJ's, I honestly think it depends. Raffy was never a top tier player in the league or at his position so that doesn't work well in his case either. But, I think he gets in eventually because the stats are just too gaudy. When you think about it, the voters will change in 10 years or so to folks who have different opinions on the roid era than the geezers who vote now. I think Bonds will get in because before his supposed use, he was a borderline HOF'er to begin with. Clemens I think is never getting in. You think about before he came to Toronto and used to recover from injuries, was he a sure fire HOF pitcher in Boston? Great seasons sure, but as a whole? I think A-Rod gets in as well. Sosa will never get in. I just don't think he was that great of a player TBH. Sheff might.
HOF is my biggest issue in MLB for some reason and some writers and their articles annoy the hell out of me. I don't see how Jack Morris is a HOF'er for example. Edgar should be in. Bagwell got absolutely HOSED IMO. Deny him because of suspicion when he's clearly denied all wrong doing his entire career and never tested positive or appeared on the Mitchell Report or in Canseco's book. Because he worked out too much. Good lesson for kids, work out too much and too hard for your goals and we're going to put you in a group of cheaters. Raines should be in. Trammell should be in. So should Larkin.
Originally Posted by Proshares
I think Archer will be a solid #3 one day. Outside of that, more depth players than impact players IMO. Gave up a bigger number of kids rather than a blue chipper. Good for them to do it now before Tampa falls out and you have teams offering up better packages in July. A lot of right handed power in that division so he helps.
DJ's, I honestly think it depends. Raffy was never a top tier player in the league or at his position so that doesn't work well in his case either. But, I think he gets in eventually because the stats are just too gaudy. When you think about it, the voters will change in 10 years or so to folks who have different opinions on the roid era than the geezers who vote now. I think Bonds will get in because before his supposed use, he was a borderline HOF'er to begin with. Clemens I think is never getting in. You think about before he came to Toronto and used to recover from injuries, was he a sure fire HOF pitcher in Boston? Great seasons sure, but as a whole? I think A-Rod gets in as well. Sosa will never get in. I just don't think he was that great of a player TBH. Sheff might.
HOF is my biggest issue in MLB for some reason and some writers and their articles annoy the hell out of me. I don't see how Jack Morris is a HOF'er for example. Edgar should be in. Bagwell got absolutely HOSED IMO. Deny him because of suspicion when he's clearly denied all wrong doing his entire career and never tested positive or appeared on the Mitchell Report or in Canseco's book. Because he worked out too much. Good lesson for kids, work out too much and too hard for your goals and we're going to put you in a group of cheaters. Raines should be in. Trammell should be in. So should Larkin.