OFFICIAL NBA 2017-2018 Off-Season Thread

Which Kobe was better

  • No. 8

    Votes: 29 49.2%
  • No. 24

    Votes: 30 50.8%

  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aaron Gordon, Steven Adams too.

Everybody has been on Jaren Jackson’s bandwagon too. He’s been considered a top 5-10 pick for a minute.
He hasn't been a top 5 prospect all college season though

Jackson has been a lottery prospect but he's shot up something serious in the past 2 months, I'd say there's a big difference between being considered around 10 all the way up to 5 and that's exactly what happened

Gordon isn't quite elite yet, but I'll allow it

Adams is a good example
 
Yeah football is the other. I never said you could go straight to the NFL from high school lol that's the point. You can do it in the MLB but not NBA and NFL.

Physically there's no way anyone would be capable of going straight to the NFL. Would be super unsafe and the development in college is super necessary.
 
Jaren Jackson is not a top 5 pick. Some team might reach on him between 5-7, because there’s always a dumb, desperate team drafting in that area..
 
Real talk though, still think student athletes shouldn't be paid, but **** the NCAA.

There's a giant misallocation. People want to see college basketball and football. No one's tryna watch swimming, tennis, bowling, etc. You gonna pay those kids too? Hell no. What about the division 2 teams? Zero chance their athletes get paid.
 
Real talk though, still think student athletes shouldn't be paid, but **** the NCAA.

There's a giant misallocation. People want to see college basketball and football. No one's tryna watch swimming, tennis, bowling, etc. You gonna pay those kids too? Hell no. What about the division 2 teams? Zero chance their athletes get paid.

It’s a tricky situation but seeing those contracts for March madness, I’m sure they could figure something out.

And we’re a capitalist country. The basketball coach makes more than the women’s swim team coach. Ayton should be paid more than Jane Doe. Life ain’t fair, B
 
Real talk though, still think student athletes shouldn't be paid, but **** the NCAA.

There's a giant misallocation. People want to see college basketball and football. No one's tryna watch swimming, tennis, bowling, etc. You gonna pay those kids too? Hell no. What about the division 2 teams? Zero chance their athletes get paid.

This is America, in business there will always be misallocations it is what it is.

Would you pay the swim team or the bowling team? No.

Would you pay D2 teams? No.

In all sectors of American economy we pay people according to their worth (actually we don't, but yeah) so why should the NCAA, a business, operate any differently?
 
It’s a tricky situation but seeing those contracts for March madness, I’m sure they could figure something out.

And we’re a capitalist country. The basketball coach makes more than the women’s swim team coach. Ayton should be paid more than Jane Doe. Life ain’t fair, B

College sports shouldn’t be a business or a semi pro league.

What id like to see is a federal law capping how much of a public university budget can go to athletics and capping head coach salaries under teachers.

That would get college sports where it’s supposed to be. And then a real minor league could exist without all the hypocrisy lies and bs
 
Pay the teachers. **** the student athletes. No one's tryna see a bunch of 18 year olds driving beamers wearing 18k cubans to class practice. Most these kids dont even pay their own cell phone bill.
the kids are bringing way more revenue to the schools than the teachers though
 
College sports shouldn’t be a business or a semi pro league.

What id like to see is a federal law capping how much of a public university budget can go to athletics and capping head coach salaries under teachers.

That would get college sports where it’s supposed to be. And then a real minor league could exist without all the hypocrisy lies and bs

College sports SHOULDNT be a business, but it is. And that's never changing.

So if college sports is a business, then why should the swim team get the same amount of money as the Football, or basketball team?
 
College sports SHOULDNT be a business, but it is. And that's never changing.

So if college sports is a business, then why should the swim team get the same amount of money as the Football, or basketball team?

You say it’s never changing but it needs to be changed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom