- 7,636
- 13,506
Don't let money and fame **** you up NT Fam,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MUST WATCH
Best footage from inside the Capitol from The New Yorker. The whole video is good but I cued it to when they hit Chambers and started going through documents.
As someone who has called this thread an echo chamber in the past, I can understand the tone of your post.
But while I no longer support Trump, I do think many in this thread still disagree with many of my views including those on abortion and welfare reform.
There is also a rift between Bernie supporters and those who support more moderate Democratic candidates.
But the thread, undoubtedly, skews left.
The answer is never, which I don't understand conservatives supporting that, tells me that their conservatism isn't really about limited govt intervention.I certainly understand your perspective. The question becomes at what point does the protection of the child’s life become a compelling governmental interest sufficient to justify a restriction on the right to choose?
Based on your post, it seems you don’t believe that is until birth.
I just disagree with that. But I am okay with Roe.
Bruh!!!!
Terrorist breaks into the capital and starts talking about "respect"
For late-term abortions and such, I'm ok with ethics committees at medical institutes weighing in. I just think those cases become so complex that any law to try to regulate is too blunt. For almost any other medical procedure, there's general guidelines but the details of the decision come down to the physicians, the patient, and an ethics committee (if needed) and they do it on a case-by-case basis.I certainly understand your perspective. The question becomes at what point does the protection of the child’s life become a compelling governmental interest sufficient to justify a restriction on the right to choose?
Based on your post, it seems you don’t believe that is until birth.
I just disagree with that. But I am okay with Roe.
If by left you mean:
- Opposed to people who agree with leaders who support white supremacy
- Opposed to dumb people who refuse to believe in science in the name of "freedom"
- Opposed to believe everyone starts from the same place and poor people are poor because they didnt' work hard
Then I guess this thread does skew left. That's not an "echo chamber", that's just being decent empathetic human beings who communicate in a thread in an online forum.
Reality has a liberal bias. Plenty of folks in here who don't identify as democrat but are competent enough adults to know right from wrong.If by left you mean:
- Opposed to people who agree with leaders who support white supremacy
- Opposed to dumb people who refuse to believe in science in the name of "freedom"
- Opposed to believe everyone starts from the same place and poor people are poor because they didnt' work hard
Then I guess this thread does skew left. That's not an "echo chamber", that's just being decent empathetic human beings who communicate in a thread in an online forum.
I certainly understand your perspective. The question becomes at what point does the protection of the child’s life become a compelling governmental interest sufficient to justify a restriction on the right to choose?
Based on your post, it seems you don’t believe that is until birth.
I just disagree with that. But I am okay with Roe.
Reality has a liberal bias. Plenty of folks in here who don't identify as democrat but are competent enough adults to know right from wrong.
For late-term abortions and such, I'm ok with ethics committees at medical institutes weighing in. I just think those cases become so complex that any law to try to regulate is too blunt. For almost any other medical procedure, there's general guidelines but the details of the decision come down to the physicians, the patient, and an ethics committee (if needed) and they do it on a case-by-case basis.
Yeah don't tell me about the protection of life from the govt when it's a struggle from them to provide the born ones with proper assistance.when republicans start actually protecting the lives of children then we can talk
Even something as simple as this is too much for those deplorables
GOP rejects FLOTUS in lunch battle
House Republicans attempt to peel back school lunch reforms championed by Michelle Obama.www.politico.com
I think that you and I can agree that with the sudden unearthing of white supremacist bottom feeders storming the capitol, that abortion should indeed be legal.I’ called you out on this before and I’ll do it again here. “Pro-life” is about the narrow issue of abortion.
Your post is similar to the posts by white supremacists who write “Black Lives Matter” under posts about black people dying from something other than systematic or systemic injustices, like excessive force by police officers.
It is a red herring.
Skew left implies there's some sort of political stance with the statements I presented.To be clear I’m not calling the thread an echo chamber. I said I did so in the past.
I was actually saying there are diverse opinions in this thread. But it certainly skews left as you said.
I certainly understand your perspective. The question becomes at what point does the protection of the child’s life become a compelling governmental interest sufficient to justify a restriction on the right to choose?
Based on your post, it seems you don’t believe that is until birth.
I just disagree with that. But I am okay with Roe.
I think that you and I can agree that with the sudden unearthing of white supremacist bottom feeders storming the capitol, that abortion should indeed be legal.
Correct?
Skew left implies there's some sort of political stance with the statements I presented.
"White supremacy is bad" is not a left/right statement. Or should not be anyway. Somehow, we've politicized science and human decency. But people like you continue to use these labels on issues that should have absolutely no political rhetoric behind them.
Here's a legitimate left/right issue:
* How much should the tax rate be?
I have my thoughts on this, but I absolutely understand small business owners who want less taxes so they can earn a larger profit margin, and therefore vote Republican. That's 100% understandable.
But this notion that people who believe things like black people have not been treated fairly, are still being feeling the ramifications of slavery, Jim Crow and segregation are somehow "lefties" is perpetuated by people like you and fail to recognize it's simply a human issue, not a damn political one.
Yeah don't tell me about the protection of life from the govt when it's a struggle from them to provide the born ones with proper assistance.
dudes haven’t done shhhhh after the many many MANY school shootings
and this dude wanna talk about protecting the lives of children
would also think health care and higher minimum wage would have a significant impact on the lives of children.. and addressing the dangers of guns
dudes haven’t done shhhhh after the many many MANY school shootings
and this dude wanna talk about protecting the lives of children
would also think health care and higher minimum wage would have a significant impact on the lives of children.. and addressing the dangers of guns