***Official Political Discussion Thread***

disgusting how much hesitation there is around the $1,400 stimulus checks. This is the people's money...our tax dollars.
Money in people's pockets will boost the economy unlike the billions given to corporations who only used it to buy back their stocks and give exec bonuses. We also gave our money to wall street in 00s so they wouldnt go under.
Someone needs to go on TV and put this nonsense to bed.
 
love this woman


Sure she's competent, clever and sharp, but I had gotten used to the waving of binders and the storming out, crying in hallways.

hannity-clip-gif_2_oaeq62.gif
 
At the beginning of the piece, I was seeing where the dude was coming from. He seemed to be upfront about his relationship with this wife.

Then I got to the accounts of the night in question.

Drew's take...


His homeboy's take wild sersion...


For some reason, the sex worker's take just seems more believable. And that really makes me look at Gillum like he is still not being honest with himself

yup.

i got to that part and I was out cmon famb


it feels like Andrew is tryna hit that rebrand but no black journalist wanna couporate with him.
keep asking him too many real *** questions .

like

" Andrew elaborated, his wife looking on: “The non fidelis [unfaithful] part was I put myself in a situation where anything could have happened, including something that could have betrayed or would have betrayed my vows. "

what this mean? you put yourself in a situation where anything could happen"?
naw famb you went there looking for something very specific to happen. :lol:

also "non fidelis" ???
you start hitting me with latin and i know you lying.



im sorry if Lidsey Graham can keep his **** locked up, why can't you? :lol:

Instead you embarrassed a black women who will forever tied to this ****. i can't rock with it. :smh:
 
yup.

i got to that part and I was out cmon famb


it feels like Andrew is tryna hit that rebrand but no black journalist wanna couporate with him.
keep asking him too many real *** questions .

like

" Andrew elaborated, his wife looking on: “The non fidelis [unfaithful] part was I put myself in a situation where anything could have happened, including something that could have betrayed or would have betrayed my vows. "

what this mean? you put yourself in a situation where anything could happen"?
naw famb you went there looking for something very specific to happen. :lol:

also "non fidelis" ???
you start hitting me with latin and i know you lying.



im sorry if Lidsey Graham can keep his **** locked up, why can't you? :lol:

Instead you embarrassed a black women who will forever tied to this ****. i can't rock with it. :smh:

Bruh....the pictures of the male escort dude will forever be burned in my head. Like, we all know what THAT was.

He really embarrassed everybody. And a white body builder druggy dude at that :lol. Like, cmon dawg. He was WILDING in the highest sense. Smfh
 
"ah you know just hanging with my shirtless steroid muscle gay platonic male bud with the thirteen pack ( happens to gay escort on in between nursing shift)

who decided to randomly drug me with a mysterious drink that didn't show up on a drug test,

just a regular shmegular day on south beach. "

:lol: LIE BETTER MAN!


I pray his wife don't believe this **** and she's just tryna help him with his rebrand.
 
Drew undermined everything he said about his sexuality (which were good points and makes me empathize with him) by making up that stupid *** story. He reinforced the same stereotypes he was trying to tear down by peddling that story.

Like who does he expect to fool?

Does he think that folk gonna be like "Well I don't know what it is like to have a drinking problem and be bisexual, and have to hide it, and the story leaked quickly, so maybe nothing happened and it was a set up"

Famb, no one is buying that

Like when I read that I thought to myself that if I ended up drunk, passed out, zooted off drugs, and bucket naked in a hotel room with Teanna ODing next to me, which would be a more reasonable explanation of how I got there:

a) I went to the room drunk just to hang out in a platonic way, and she must have drug me

b) I got twisted, went up to the room, was gonna pay for some yambs, but things got wild and I took too many dong pills because I wanted to get my money's worth and I passed out

So I know mans is BSing me.

Yo Drew...
giphy.gif


Stop the cappin my guy.

People know what you were doing, just be honest with folk.
 
Last edited:

bbc2c1b7e5e85f291275eac6d366366b.1000x1000x1.jpg


Just so we’re clear, did Biden clipped the whole unity stuff? Lol
Calls for unity that only require compromise from the party in power are the new bad faith "both sides" take.

Democrats shouldn't act like they require Republicans’ permission to implement policies that are both urgently needed and wildly popular.

To that end, they shouldn’t be moving with anything less than the same exigency that Republicans applied to ram a partisan Supreme Court nominee through before the election.

Make Republicans vote against stimulus checks. Make them vote against healthcare. Make them vote against extending the eviction moratorium and student debt cancellation. Make them vote against a wealth tax, favored by two-thirds of Americans. Make them vote against the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, and against the concept of democracy itself. Make the bills as simple and clean as possible, so as to deny them cover. Put them on record every single time you can, and in 2022 there should be no sincere observer left who truly believes that “both sides are the same.”

If “unity” means anything, it means that we should come together in service to the common good. COVID-19 relief is a unifying endeavor. Democrats have invited Republicans to take part in this effort. If they choose not to do so, they’re the ones shunning unity.

"how would you define racism"

- @dwalk31


not so great scott.jpg


He doesn't strike me as a grifter honestly.
You didn't give money to Green for All.

I don't see Bryan Stevenson on cable television with tears in his eyes thanking Trump for the First Step Act.


accidentally atheist.gif
 
I didn't see this posted yet -- confirms the speculation that the insurrection was planned and was directly organized by Roger Stone. Given Stone is Trump's operative and Trump pardoned him, it's pretty obvious that he was working with Trump on all this.

They both need to be made to answer for their crimes against our country.

"So, hopefully we have this today, right?" one supporter asks Stone in the video, which was posted just after 10 a.m. on the morning of the rally. "We shall see," Stone replies.

 




I'm confused

Bernie is helping write the Senate version of the bill

He is expected to put it in

But Biden is saying that he feels the Senate parliamentarian will say it can't pass but Budget Reconcialition.

If she does that, Harris can overrule her.

But Manchin won't agree to vote yes if Harris overrules her.

So it is probably gonna die one way or the other.
 
somebody who isn't me thinks this is pretty cool
:lol:
With this unprecedented crackdown on 'OG' (original) usernames by almost all the social media companies coordinating together, it seemed best to make proper use of allegedly etc given the alleged past activities.

I just hope they don't ban my personal accounts just because they're OGs, after all I acquired them all legally. Well allegedly aside from that one Tw*tch.TV account but the company is well aware of that and doesn't mind. I've gotten plenty of offers up to $3000 over the years for the latter but I do intend to continue honoring my end of the deal I struck with the company.

This sums up exactly what I do, except I don't 'swap' for other people. Perfectly legal to run such an automated tool to acquire usernames.
Ironically, in the past my autoclaimer has beaten people who tried to swap a hacked IG username and ended up losing out because they weren't fast enough :lol:
61ff26b4183a37a016764e23f6cecc04.png
 
:lol:
With this unprecedented crackdown on 'OG' (original) usernames by almost all the social media companies coordinating together, it seemed best to make proper use of allegedly etc given the alleged past activities.

I just hope they don't ban my personal accounts just because they're OGs, after all I acquired them all legally. Well allegedly aside from that one Tw*tch.TV account but the company is well aware of that and doesn't mind.

This sums up exactly what I do, except I don't 'swap' for other people. Perfectly legal to run such an automated tool to acquire usernames.
Ironically, in the past my autoclaimer has beaten people who tried to swap a hacked IG username and ended up losing out because they weren't fast enough :lol:
61ff26b4183a37a016764e23f6cecc04.png
I assume you have already snatched up jrose5 jrose5 on here and are waiting for the right time to sell it to aepps20 aepps20
 
Back
Top Bottom