It's almost as if you shouldn't elect people with an abject contempt for the very concept of governance.
Ironically, Texas Republicans are capable of recognizing the limitations of the "free market" in protecting their imagined right to publish hate speech online, while the drawbacks of permitting a regional utility monopoly to neglect overdue infrastructure reinvestment in favor of further remunerating shareholders continue to elude them. (If only they had access to some sort of heat-generating space laser...)
And yet, because they've been forced to grudgingly accept the outcome of a quasi-democratic election heavily gerrymandered in their favor, their state will nonetheless receive (however hypocritically) the federal support they
requested and
not the federal support they
deserve:
We know who Delk will support and let's just say he has da OG colorway.
Support takes on many different forms.
For instance:
Donald Trump: dozens - if not by now hundreds - of posts defending his policies and behavior over the course of his lone term in office, purchase of merchandise, downballot votes to protect his agenda.
Raphael Warnock: an alleged campaign contribution totaling less than 25% of a highly questionable EIDL advance requested for a Stock X "business," to forever serve as a shield in defense of the above.
Barack Obama: ??
"Diversity training costs money."
Also:
"Diversity training doesn't work. It just intensifies racial resentment.¹ Multiple studies have proven this.²"
1. Myselfani, M. (2020). “Sharon at Work Is Annoying.,” Things I've Heard, Experiences I've Had, pp. 14-17. "If diversity training worked, why is Sharon in accounting still asking me if she can touch my hair? It's hair, Sharon. It feels like hair."
2. Ibid.
www.ustodaylife.com
