Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 33,902
- 81,063
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anti-Vaccine Cartoonist With 'Rough' COVID Case Would Never Go to Hospital
Ben Garrison has lost 15 pounds since contracting COVID-19 but believes hospitals are being financially motivated to increase COVID-19 deaths.www.newsweek.com
thoughts and prayers
Why?"Abolitionists" say that Camden isn't a good example, FYI.
There's a few articles on it being a false misportrayal. I read them a while ago (I think after it being discussed in this thread), so I can't remember what I actually read. I'll drop a few links below.Why?
Edit: I used Camden as an example of radical police reform, not as an example of police abolition. My point is that it took action above the local level to drastically change the culture of law enforcement in that city. The gradual replacement of the police force that osh kosh bosh suggested still leaves in place some of the gatekeepers who can still perpetuate the current police culture through selection of hires and training. That approach has a higher potential for failure than a fire-and-replace approach IMO.
Being lost to the gop? noYou seriously think LA, San Fran, NYC, DC, Seattle and other deep blue cities are in danger of being lost to the GOP if police reform is tied to rising crime?
Because if you are asking people to consider the political environment, then you are saying this one issue will swing an area by 10-40 points.
Hmmmm, ok. Find that hard to believe though.
But since everyone from Fox News to NYT are already doing that. I guess liberal-controlled cities will mostly turn red in 2021 and 2022.
Personal experience - Portland elected the "pro cop" mayor and he's been an abject failure from top to bottom. And this has been since pre-COVID conditions, and before pro-reform discourse. The Portland Police Bureau is a violent right-wing joke of a boys club that's only seen more funding, more lawsuits, and more calls for reform over the past few years.Being lost to the gop? no
Reactionary pro police Democrats getting elected in a backlash and undoing any reforms you do enact I think is a risk.
Sorry, but isn't this a goal post-move?Being lost to the gop? no
Reactionary pro police Democrats getting elected in a backlash and undoing any reforms you do enact I think is a risk.
Sorry, but isn't this a goal post-move?
Because it seems like this completely removes the party considerations from local liberals and progressives.
So they shouldn't push policy to make things better, which is being blocked by pro-cop Dems, because it might cause backlash from voters who will vote in elect all pro-cop Dems, that will repeal the little regulations on the books that have proven to be inadequate to keep the police in check.
Like I am not saying progressive should indulge in self-sabotage, but in practice, you are pretty much saying that they should give up on enacting positive change.
Basically progressive need to fight to protect the status quo? That's it.
Uhhh ok.
-You didn't say it, but seem not willing to grapple with another political environment outside of what you think supports your argument. Like here you just circled back to your original point but that was when you made it seem like the blowback we would see would be on the national level.I don't think I said that at all
I said they should push to make things better in a politically durable way.
instituting accountability reforms without targeted investments for crime reduction and solving is imo not politically durable.
using activist rhetoric around police issues like defund, abolish or purge or whatever is not politically durable and only empowers police unions.
thankfully "defund the police" has been pretty thoroughly exposed that most people and politicians have dropped it totally.
They know they are racist. So once you feed the white grievance beast, viewers will accept stupidnessFox News really think their viewers are incredibly stupid.
fixedFox News knows their viewers are incredibly stupid.
-You didn't say it, but seem not willing to grapple with another political environment outside of what you think supports your argument. Like here you just circled back to your original point but that was when you made it seem like the blowback we would see would be on the national level.
They need to advocate for things in a political durable way, yes of course. But first, the backlash would hurt the national party. Then no it wasn't only the national it would hurt their cities. But not to the GOP, to other pro-cop democrats that will somehow win enough power to repeal stuff against the wishes of their base, stuff that is shown to be inadequate to solve the problem. Progressives, not one of them, even on the local level, must never cross some line or calamity will be insured. Honestly, no offense, but you speak like you don't know what has been happening in liberal cities already. People have been asking nicely and voting to increase police budgets for decades, running on that fact, and have gotten little in return. More recently police budgets have been well funded with the slightest uptick in murders (which again was misrepresented as crime).
But still, your theory will be tested, I expect pro-cop Dems that want to let the police off the flimsy leash they are on will sweep into power in the next two years. So I guess we will see.
We live in a world where progressives and liberals were trying to improve policing before George Floyd. And activists existed before Defund the Police became a thing. Because your shining example of "activist language bad" is something that most activist and progressive politicians didn't even indulge in or run on. It is the one bad faith right-wingers signal boosted for political gain. And the answer to this is to hold the progressive coalition to some impossible standard that no other political movement has come close to. And present it as some common sense strategy. Uhhh ok famb.
Add to that the warnings you were making months ago didn't come true, anywhere close to it in fact. But, it still has to be some major concern?
-Locally, the status quo is being defended by a lot of centrist Democrats. It took the international backlash to George Floyd for a few smaller reforms to be put in place.
If a consensus is not formed to make a centrist move, then nothing will get done. Liberals and Progressive can follow your plan to a tee, but centrists will be a roadblock.
So in the end, given history seems like the status quo will remain until people near the center stop the ****
-Also, most politicians never ran on Defund the Police. That is a false claim that you and many others have been making. Like I said, adopting that same framing of 2020 that right-wingers did.
Seemingly in an attempt, the grievances around defund the police seem more legit. Because as you already conceded that the progressive left painted as unifying around a position because of bad faith conservative attacks. So I don't know how one can be thankful for people doing something that we know most politicians didn't do