- 150,418
- 201,049
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
since youre here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If you dispute the characterization that you are a low effort griefer, perhaps you should stop acting like one.Terrible, if true
If you dispute the characterization that you are a low effort griefer, perhaps you should stop acting like one.
You say your “support” has switched, but your shtick remains unchanged. You play “bad news for dems” bot without comment. If someone calls you out, you do the same excessively literal semantics bit as Kyrsten Sinema at the elevator and everyone who’s ever said “I don’t know, CAN you?” It’s boring.
Your entire presence in this thread could be replaced with a few dozen lines of code.
Kindly deposit your feigned offense and whataboutism so you can scurry off with today’s attention harvest.
Why do you support pedos?Posters tag me in random posts daily. No comment from you. No statement on the boringness of it. No comment on how it could be easily replaced with a few lines of code. Your schtick of over-policing my posts (really my lack of posts) hasn’t changed either.
What would you have me say to each daily mention? I’ll just copy and paste it at the beginning of every response to a mention to avoid being labeled a low-effort griefer/attention harvester.
Wow, terrible if true.Posters tag me in random posts daily. No comment from you. No statement on the boringness of it. No comment on how it could be easily replaced with a few lines of code. Your schtick of over-policing my posts (really my lack of posts) hasn’t changed either.
What would you have me say to each daily mention? I’ll just copy and paste it at the beginning of every response to a mention to avoid being labeled a low-effort griefer/attention harvester.
I can see how someone may come to that conclusionPosters tag me in random posts daily. No comment from you. No statement on the boringness of it. No comment on how it could be easily replaced with a few lines of code. Your schtick of over-policing my posts (really my lack of posts) hasn’t changed either.
What would you have me say to each daily mention? I’ll just copy and paste it at the beginning of every response to a mention to avoid being labeled a low-effort griefer/attention harvester.
Your feigned offense and whataboutism have been accepted.Posters tag me in random posts daily. No comment from you. No statement on the boringness of it. No comment on how it could be easily replaced with a few lines of code. Your schtick of over-policing my posts (really my lack of posts) hasn’t changed either.
What would you have me say to each daily mention? I’ll just copy and paste it at the beginning of every response to a mention to avoid being labeled a low-effort griefer/attention harvester.
Sad if trueYour feigned offense and whataboutism have been accepted.
goto workmode;
You say you "support" Joe Biden, but you post bad news for dems almost exclusively. Those "great policies" you didn't vote for? You only want to mention them if it looks like they won't come to fruition due to gerrymandering and anti-democratic obstructionism. Jobs numbers? Not if they're positive for the politician you "support!"
Rarely do you actually discuss any of these issues. When pressed, you merely perform listless evasive gestures.
I can't remember the last time I saw you even attempt to present a cogent point about policy.
Why are you here, if not to antagonize? The people you accuse of acting in bad faith at least discuss the issues. They tag you for that purpose.
Your default is to toss out provocations, maybe fire off a threadbare cliché from your empty cupboard of boilerplate rejoinders if someone takes the bait, and scamper off. aepps in character engages in better faith than you do.
This is the behavior one would expect of a person who purchased apparel bearing a White nationalist slogan to "spark conversations." You're dying for people to ask you about your hat, but then you have nothing to say.
How would one describe that if not "attention-seeking?"
"Over-policing?" You've been trolling this thread for years and I've given you the benefit of the doubt.
This is not the "political antagonism thread." If you're not interested in discussion, you're in the wrong place.
You say you "support" Joe Biden, but you post bad news for dems almost exclusively.
Your feigned offense and whataboutism have been accepted.
goto workmode;
You say you "support" Joe Biden, but you post bad news for dems almost exclusively. Those "great policies" you didn't vote for? You only want to mention them if it looks like they won't come to fruition due to gerrymandering and anti-democratic obstructionism. Jobs numbers? Not if they're positive for the politician you "support!"
Rarely do you actually discuss any of these issues. When pressed, you merely perform listless evasive gestures.
I can't remember the last time I saw you even attempt to present a cogent point about policy.
Why are you here, if not to antagonize? The people you accuse of acting in bad faith at least discuss the issues. They tag you for that purpose.
Your default is to toss out provocations, maybe fire off a threadbare cliché from your empty cupboard of boilerplate rejoinders if someone takes the bait, and scamper off. aepps in character engages in better faith than you do.
This is the behavior one would expect of a person who purchased apparel bearing a White nationalist slogan to "spark conversations." You're dying for people to ask you about your hat, but then you have nothing to say.
How would one describe that if not "attention-seeking?"
"Over-policing?" You've been trolling this thread for years and I've given you the benefit of the doubt.
This is not the "political antagonism thread." If you're not interested in discussion, you're in the wrong place.
I declined to engage
Respectfully
I gave you my reason for doing so
Then you responded by calling me Geppetto.
You are not a victim Delk
I posted that without him even asking. That’s why it was funny you maga hat. Why do you support pedos?You not wanting to engage is my explanation for posting links without comment. I thought that was clear.
I called you Geppetto because you told another poster ( blastercombo ) to ask me his normal questions, and then he did. Those questions are related to pedo support and womens’ privates.
I’m not a victim. And you aren’t a victim either, Geppetto.
I posted that without him even asking. That’s why it was funny you maga hat. Why do you support pedos?
I did those days before you asked my to engage on the topicYou not wanting to engage is my explanation for posting links without comment. I thought that was clear.
I called you Geppetto because you told another poster ( blastercombo ) to ask me his normal questions, and then he did. Those questions are related to pedo support and womens’ privates.
I’m not a victim. And you aren’t a victim either, Geppetto.
I did those days before you asked my to engage on the topic
I know I am not a victim. That is why I don't write paragraphs to Methodical Management whining about how people treat me.
So you can call me names to bait me. It isn't gonna work