- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,009
- 3,294
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,966
- 196,177
Crazy how you always happen to get busy when there is a positive jobs report
So strange
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,009
- 3,294
I’ve posted both positive and negative jobs reports. I’m old enough to remember you saying they didn’t matter one way or the other.
But considering what I do, it isn’t strange at all that certain times are busier than others.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,966
- 196,177
Dude, I'm not a farmer and you are not a manure salesman
No need to try to make me buy this ********
- Jul 18, 2013
- 32,875
- 81,610
they mad
I would just send back "Your son will fail." and not respond anymore
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,009
- 3,294
I’d be interested to know how that’d work with the AP exam.
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,960
- 36,308
To circle back to the discussion on the anti-Democrat bias of the US media:
- May 25, 2004
- 30,327
- 40,848
most news makes you dumber.
If anyone has any reliable news sources feel free to post them up. I got nothing.
If anyone has any reliable news sources feel free to post them up. I got nothing.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
since you’re here, any thoughts on ya boy flushing documents?
dont people get arrest for this type of stuff?
Last edited:
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,966
- 196,177
Manchin still insisting that the most important thing is sabotaging his own party
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,009
- 3,294
- Oct 28, 2013
- 42,718
- 178,498
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,960
- 36,308
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
so what should be the consequences of his actions?
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,009
- 3,294
It depends on if they were declassified or not. If they weren’t, then whoever is responsible for removing the documents should be prosecuted in accordance with the law.
- Mar 26, 2009
- 7,091
- 5,385
Nice dodge because you know he most likely didn't technically remove the documents himself. They obviosly weren't declassified and has already been said to be classified. So, should Trump be prosecuted for having the documents?
- Jan 16, 2011
- 14,960
- 36,308
China bought none of the $200 billion it promised from the U.S. under âPhase 1â trade deal, study reveals
Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics examined the phase-one agreement inked during the administration of former President Donald...
www.marketwatch.com
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,009
- 3,294
It is my understanding that the president has the right to declassify anything at anytime.
Do presidents have 'the ability to declassify anything'?
The blockbuster article in The Washington Post saying President Donald Trump had "revealed highly classified information
www.politifact.com
If he did not, and he has them in his possession, then he should be prosecuted in accordance with any law he’s violated.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
- Mar 26, 2009
- 7,091
- 5,385
Irrelevant because it was already said that it was classified docs. Also, the sitting president can reclassify documents. Another irrelevant fact.
Good, glad you agree. Great step forward.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,966
- 196,177
Dude, just watch PBS Newshour
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,168
- 202,592
Similar threads
