***Official Political Discussion Thread***



Need his neighbor to run it back

IMG_1569.jpeg


Not the hero we deserve but the one we need right now.
 
Bank of America out here scamming:lol: :lol: :rofl:
Not even surprised

BOA is a lowlife organization

When I was 18, broke, living paycheck to paycheck, sometimes I used to overdraft my account from time to time. If the transactions cleared in chronological order, I would have one overdraft fee.

But BOA's algorithm would clear them in a way to maximizing the amount of overdraft fees they could charge me. Then I call and complain and they just shrug and say "it is the system"

I was dating a girl around that time that worked part time at a branch in DC. When people would come in to cash their checks, they would make tellers enter their info to see if they had an account, and if it was over drafted. Then teller had to subtract the overdraft amount from what they would give people from the cashed amount. And they were told to do this without warning people about this.

Every Friday it was a mad house, and police had to be called often.

One time this dude pull a knife out and swiped at her. Caught her on the chin and she had to get stitches. This is early 2000s, so she didn't have insurance. She had to pay outta pocket. Then she got fired for not wanting to return to work soon after the incident. Then made her sign a paper absolving BOA of any liability so she can get her last check and like $100 for her medical bills.

I generally hate big banks, but Wells Fargo and Bank of America and two institutions sincerely loathe.
 
Last edited:
Not even surprised

BOA is a lowlife organization

When I was 18, broke, living paycheck to paycheck, sometimes I used to overdraft my account from time to time. If the transactions cleared in chronological order, I would have one overdraft fee.

But BOA's algorithm would clear them in a way to maximizing the amount of overdraft fees they could charge me. Then I call and complain and they just shrug and say "it is the system"

I was dating a girl around that time that worked part time at a branch in DC. When people would come in to cash their checks, they would make tellers enter their info to see if they had an account, and if it was over drafted. Then teller had to extract the overdraft amount from what they would give people from the cashed amount. And they were told to do this without warning people about this.

Every Friday it was a mad house, and police had to be called often.

One time this dude pull a knife out and swiped at her. Caught her on the chin and she had to get stitches. This is early 2000s, so she didn't have insurance. She had to pay outta pocket. Then she got fired for not wanting to return to work soon after the incident. Then made her sign a paper absolving BOA of any liability so she can get her last check and like $100 for her medical bills.

I generally hate big banks, but Wells Fargo and Bank of America and two institutions sincerely loathe.

I DETEST BOA and Wells. As you said, scumbaggary and skullduggery all around. The worse of the worse.

I owe BOA money too. :lol
 
The case for Tim Scott is mainly an innocuous political take of a more mainstream non-Trumpy conservative with more moderate rhetoric being a tougher opponent to beat than Trump. Mainly because of them being better at winning swing voters.

But Osh's Tim Scott-specific argument relies on some significant assumptions.

-First, the argument for Scott in a general election seems to be based on the assumption that he replicates Trump's numbers and trends and does better with swing conservative-leaning voters.

So white rural voters are going to be as excited for Scott as Trump? Will Scott replicate the splits in educated vs. non-educated,? Will he be able to replicate Trump's numbers with Latinos?

Even if he makes inroads with black men, are they gonna be in the right places? He needs to flip the black men In WI, PA, MI (we have a recent example of a black moderate not being enough to flip a Senate seat), and GA.

Hillary Clinton thought she could replicate the Obama coalition, and her slipping in a few places cost her big.

I think the same worries should apply to Tim Scott. That him not being Trump will help in some areas, and hurt in others, and it is hard to say how things shake out given the margins for victory are razor thin.

I think a more normie conservative without the baggage of Trump would claw back some Trump-hating moderate conservatives. But that might not be enough on aggregate.

-This whole VP angel seems like even more of a reach. Who is he going to be VP to, Trump? If so that will make him a well-known far-right conservative reactionary. He has a positive net rating right now mainly because he is unknown.

Trump will be his identity after four years of trying to sugarcoat his bull****.

The 2028 Republican primary will be tough on him because he can either run under the Trump banner to protect his right flank which makes him toxic for the general.

Or try to moderate which hurts him with far-right primary voters.

Also, he is not gonna be facing Joe Biden in 2028. That article osh kosh bosh osh kosh bosh posted specifically talked about his prospect vs. 2024 Biden.

In 2028 after four more years of Trump, he will be facing a fresh face on the Dem ticket that will be younger, more dynamic, with an activated Dem base behind them. All the on-paper positives with his identity get washed away if he has to face some like Warnock. Someone younger, also from the deep South, and seemingly a better political talent.

One of my Econometric professors said that a good economics paper depends on the assumptions made at the beginning. How plausible they are, and how to set the framework for what is coming. A good economist that writes good papers knows how to do the right amount of world-building with the right assumptions.

But if you make too many assumptions, and have to do too much world-building, you become a fiction writer.

At this point, the case for Tim Scott seems based on too many stars aligning, and too much hand waving. If things change, my opinion will change.

But to me, it seems like Tim Scott needs to start praying to Ronald Regan and the white God he worships on some Uncle Ruckus steez if he wants to be president

He gonna be all the help he can get

I think you've accurately diagnosed Tim Scott's downside risks, and I mostly agree with it.

I have no idea if the Trump coalition is repeatable by a non Trump candidate.
Are those people republicans for life now, or will they immediately disengage and never turn out for a non Trump Republican? Truthfully Im not sure.
Maybe it all falls apart and Tim Scott is just black virgin Mitt Romney, the future is unclear.

but I think with any long term projection like this, especially for something as low probability as becoming president,

imo it necessitates making some big assumptions to make any kind of prediction. Tim Scott has downside risk, but I think the upside is there.

like if you asked me Tim Scott vs. the field in 2024 and 2028 of course I'd take the field.

but in a sea of low probability options I think Tim's got a better shot than most...

and as a person who think Republican led America is bad for the globe, he's the Republican id least want to see in the general right now.
 
Sure, Ron. Appeasement worked the last time there was a tyrant attacking bordering countries...oh wait, it definitely didn't
 
If the hair salon owners are so concerned about pedophiles then surely they don’t go to church and refuse to serve pastors, right? Biblethumpers are the most utterly pathetic and overly sensitive group on the planet.
 
Back
Top Bottom