- 29,249
- 41,687
If you shaking BOA then avoiding NT Bets is nothing
I’m team “you gotta catch me butt naked” … cause I ain’t paying
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you shaking BOA then avoiding NT Bets is nothing
But BOA's algorithm would clear them in a way to maximizing the amount of overdraft fees they could charge me. Then I call and complain and they just shrug and say "it is the system"
The biggest story of the day, Bank of America opening up fake accounts and ruining customer's credit reports since 2012, barely gets any run.
Meanwhile Biden meeting with leaders at the NATO Summit TOMORROW gets the lead in the news.
No, the biggest story right now is the second-largest bank not learning from Wells Fargo's mistakes when they've been doing it themselves since 2012.
Only saw RustyShackleford finessence and a few others comment on it.
By the way, Bank of America's stock went UP today, if you want to really see some ****.
The fine is an absolute drop in the bucket -- that is an issue -- doesn't matter what they are down YTD it's irrelevant, and obviously they should have to pay back what they owe to wronged customers.
The average American wants everything with Ukraine/Russia to subside and Ukraine have all the liberties they deserve, but rich news corporations are broadcasting to millions of Americans who have been wronged, and international news a day off from even happening should take a back seat if a story breaks that is prevailing, even just for the day.
I'm not even a member of that bank, never have been.
V different than what Wells did, but I get your pointThe biggest story of the day, Bank of America opening up fake accounts and ruining customer's credit reports since 2012, barely gets any run.
Meanwhile Biden meeting with leaders at the NATO Summit TOMORROW gets the lead in the news.
No, the biggest story right now is the second-largest bank not learning from Wells Fargo's mistakes when they've been doing it themselves since 2012.
Only saw RustyShackleford finessence and a few others comment on it.
By the way, Bank of America's stock went UP today, if you want to really see some ****.
Go onV different than what Wells did, but I get your point
Or you could just waitI think you've accurately diagnosed Tim Scott's downside risks, and I mostly agree with it.
I have no idea if the Trump coalition is repeatable by a non Trump candidate.
Are those people republicans for life now, or will they immediately disengage and never turn out for a non Trump Republican? Truthfully Im not sure.
Maybe it all falls apart and Tim Scott is just black virgin Mitt Romney, the future is unclear.
but I think with any long term projection like this, especially for something as low probability as becoming president,
imo it necessitates making some big assumptions to make any kind of prediction. Tim Scott has downside risk, but I think the upside is there.
like if you asked me Tim Scott vs. the field in 2024 and 2028 of course I'd take the field.
but in a sea of low probability options I think Tim's got a better shot than most...
and as a person who think Republican led America is bad for the globe, he's the Republican id least want to see in the general right now.
Looking forward to news coming from Iowa about not being able to hire doctors and having to close hospitals.
These clowns don't learn.