- 55,080
- 145,799
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
it's not ludacris, read the article. the headline isn't dumb, it makes perfect sense for the argument.
"Trump can win on character by painting harris as a flip flopper, calling out her lack of media appearances, and bad interview moments ect. trump isn't going to win a pure policy campaign. "
Trump literally did this to Hillary Clinton, why would this argument be "ludacris"?
the problem is, people preemptively hyperventilating thinking that it's saying that Trump has better "character" than Kamala.
that's not the point the article.
it shows how weak and hypersensitive some are, yall jumping to conclusions., "WHAT HOW DARE THEY SUGGEST TRUMP HAS BETTER CHARACTER"
![Laugh :lol: :lol:](/styles/default/xenforo/NTemojis/laugh.gif)
The article is dumb. It is not 2016 anymore.
What he’s saying, has been said by plenty of conservatives over and over. More wishcasting. And it’s literally what trumps default is to. It’s what he’s currently doing. The headline and article are dumb.
Deserves to be ridiculed. It falls in line with the editorial board of nyt just going to ****. Like you said was a major issue, which is why people make fun of it
![Man shrugging: medium-dark skin tone :man_shrugging_tone4: 🤷🏾♂️](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-1f3fe-2642.png)