***Official Political Discussion Thread***

[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji] daddy style is asking for a trip to banned camp.
 
 You realize she got nearly the same punishment as the dude in your story.

I hope for your sake.........................Iemme stop.
laugh.gif


It is always the lemme pop in every couple months, and nothing else to the discussion, complain about Hillary's emails crowd that gets me.

you tell me, what should her punishment be?
I difference is she actually used non-secure systems to access classified information. My man from the story didn't. I'm sorry if to me it's a big deal. Having to sit through

mandatory briefings and online classes for **** like this only to see someone blatantly violate the rules and nothing happen to them. As far as her punishment? Whatever the

norm is for mishandling Secret and Top Secret emails.   
 
 
[thread="509493"] [/thread]
You realize she got nearly the same punishment as the dude in your story.


I hope for your sake.........................Iemme stop. :lol


It is always the lemme pop in every couple months, and nothing else to the discussion, complain about Hillary's emails crowd that gets me.


you tell me, what should her punishment be?
I difference is she actually used non-secure systems to access classified information. My man from the story didn't. I'm sorry if to me it's a big deal. Having to sit through

mandatory briefings and online classes for **** like this only to see someone blatantly violate the rules and nothing happen to them. As far as her punishment? Whatever the

norm is for mishandling Secret and Top Secret emails.   

But she got investigated and the FBI recommended no charges be brought. She was investigated

If it was found out at the time, she may have had to resign. But it wasn't.

You ever thought that maybe you're not looking at this logically and are just harping on the fact "she needs to be punished", when maybe given the laws, and the circumstances, all that could be done, has been done.

Ever consider that?
 
Dude chill, you could be banned for stuff like that. Meth is already watching this thread
Okay, so meth is that moderator, right? I guess it was a poor attempt at humor, it is how I handle bigots and racists online. Whoever is watching, my bad!
Meth is all knowing and all powerful. He is what moderators are born from and return to.





Meth may or may not also just be a supercomputer. That has yet to be disproven.
 
Last edited:
 
Plus she's going to take our guns away and then the bad men will get us
Or even worst, she might want budget cuts to the military, to pay for much important stuff.
Honest question, in what ways would you cut military spending? Being a part of the system I know there's a bunch of waste but looking from the outside in, I'm curious on how you would do it.
 
AR, i agree that she should be investigated and published if seen fit. but i have 2 main points: 1) she has already been investigated, perhaps more thoroughly than anyone could imagine, and 2) this newest round of information from weiner, while worth investigating, has given us no new evidence at this time to think that Hillary is guilty of any further wrongdoing that wasn't already thoroughly investigated the first time.

if you think she should be jailed or fined for what the FBI already investigated with painful detail, then ask the system to be changed.

edit: I'm curious about the tension between politicians and military personnel. I'm sure this Hillary situation isn't the first time there's been a tension between the two. i think the difference in cultures with respect to authority and following orders is manifesting itself in the ways you view Hillary's private server as opposed to civilians/businessmen/etc.
 
Last edited:
Last I checked - and correct me if I'm wrong - the US is spending twice as much on their military as the number two country on the list (China)

So it should be able to cut A LOT
 
Last edited:
 
 
 
[thread="509493"]Official Political Discussion Thread/32700#post_26835455​[/thread]
You realize she got nearly the same punishment as the dude in your story.


I hope for your sake.........................Iemme stop.
laugh.gif



It is always the lemme pop in every couple months, and nothing else to the discussion, complain about Hillary's emails crowd that gets me.


you tell me, what should her punishment be?
I difference is she actually used non-secure systems to access classified information. My man from the story didn't. I'm sorry if to me it's a big deal. Having to sit through

mandatory briefings and online classes for **** like this only to see someone blatantly violate the rules and nothing happen to them. As far as her punishment? Whatever the

norm is for mishandling Secret and Top Secret emails.   
But she got investigated and the FBI recommended no charges be brought. She was investigated

If it was found out at the time, she may have had to resign. But it wasn't.

You ever thought that maybe you're not looking at this logically and are just harping on the fact "she needs to be punished", when maybe given the laws, and the circumstances, all that could be done, has been done.

Ever consider that?
AR, i agree that she should be investigated and published if seen fit. but i have 2 main points: 1) she has already been investigated, perhaps more thoroughly than anyone could imagine, and 2) this newest round of information from weiner, while worth investigating, has given us no new evidence at this time to think that Hillary is guilty of any further wrongdoing that wasn't already thoroughly investigated the first time.

if you think she should be jailed or fined for what the FBI already investigated with painful detail, then ask the system to be changed.
I'll have to get back to y'all about this. I'm about to head into work.
 
Last I checked, and correct me if I'm wrong, but the US is spending twice as much on military spending as the number two country on the list (China)

So it should be able to cut A LOT
Last thing for now. Most of our spending is pay for the troops. And do you really believe the numbers Beijing and Moscow put out when it comes to defense spending?  
 
Last I checked, and correct me if I'm wrong, but the US is spending twice as much on military spending as the number two country on the list (China)


So it should be able to cut A LOT
Last thing for now. Most of our spending is pay for the troops. And do you really believe the numbers Beijing and Moscow put out when it comes to defense spending?  

I wouldn't put it past China and Russia to lie. But if the numbers are to be believed, then the US has room to cut.
 
As of today, 64,079 early votes have been cast here in MD since early voting began last Thursday.
 
Last edited:


It's true tho.

Democrats will defend Hilary no matter what, and Trump supporters will believe she's guilty and she should be in jail.

and anyone who hasn't made up their minds about these emails, doesn't play close enough attention to politics to understand what any of this **** even means.




The truth doesn't even matter at this point.

I don't even understand what you guys are arguing about at this point.
 
Last edited:


It's true tho.

Democrats will defend Hilary no matter what, and Trump supporters will believe she's guilty and she should be in jail.

and anyone who hasn't made up their minds about these emails, doesn't play close enough attention to politics to understand what any of this **** even means.




The truth doesn't even matter at this point.

I don't even understand what you guys are arguing about at this point.
Get ready for the ninja spin. Emails are the only factor now in this election.
 


It's true tho.

Democrats will defend Hilary no matter what, and Trump supporters will believe she's guilty and she should be in jail.

and anyone who hasn't made up their minds about these emails, doesn't play close enough attention to politics to understand what any of this **** even means.




The truth doesn't even matter at this point.

I don't even understand what you guys are arguing about at this point.
True. This is the result of many months of accumulating evidence. We have had over a year of daily news about these candidates. Plus they have been in the spotlight for decades. So a couple weeks of new information is not going to sway most of us unless it's something truly remarkable and sheds new light on the candidates.

More stuff about Hillary's emails or about Donald's taxes isn't really anything surprising at this point.

You're exactly right that the truth doesn't matter. If we haven't satisfied ourselves with the truth at this point, another week won't help us figure it out.

That said, it's pretty crazy that the polls have shifted significantly over the past week. Trump has added 1-2 percentage points and Hillary has dropped 0.5-1 points. The question is if a) the trend is real, b) the trend sustains itself, and c) there are enough undecided voters to make up the remaining 4 percentage points.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't put it past China and Russia to lie. But if the numbers are to be believed, then the US has room to cut.

Can you provide details on Clinton's plan for the reduction of military spending as I cannot find much information on that? Hillary has been very vague, and based of her past comments about the elimination of the sequestration of the military budget, it's a good sign that defense spending will go up with Clinton.

“Now look, I am all for cutting the fat of the budget and making sure we stretch our dollars and proud of the fact that when my husband left office, we had a balanced budget and a surplus,” she continued. “And I hope that some day we can get back to doing that. But we cannot impose arbitrary limits on something as important as our military. That make no sense at all.”

“The sequester makes our country less secure,” she explained. “Let’s end it and get a budget deal that supports America’s military, our families and our country, and let’s make reform a priority so that the Defense Department spends its budget on the right things.”
 
Did a single Trump supporter put on MAGA hat because he found out that Hillary Clinton was bad at email server management?


Did a single Hillary supporter say; damn I was with your policies 100% but man I can't get past your email server management?


Did a single undecided voter say; man, I can't decide let me break the tie, with email server management?




Cmon y'all don't see how ridiculous this all is? :lol
 
Back
Top Bottom