- 8,744
- 7,493
You are right on all fronts. But you can't on one side say this is the most important election ever, and then on the other have strong candidates not wanting to "burn political capital"Unfortunately a lot of the issues Kamala and the Democrats faced come back to Joe Biden's hubris. Remember when he said he didn't plan on running for reelection? That's the root of all of these issues.
I understand why the Democrats quickly coalesced around Harris given the timeline but she was set up to fail from the beginning. I think she ran a great campaign, all things considered and crushed Trump in the debate but she was in a tough spot. Despite all of her efforts, Harris was never going to be able to separate herself from Biden, who is a historically unpopular president. The shortened timeline also didn't give Harris much time to fully flesh out her policies either.
Ideally Democrats would have had an open primary and found a fresh-faced (likely male) candidate but given the timeline you can't pluck a candidate from relative obscurity and a lot of the strong contenders (I liked Josh Shapiro or Wes Moore) wouldn't want to burn their political capital on a failed, last minute presidential campaign in 2024 when they could run a full campaign in 2028.
Of course the entire reason the Democrats were in this difficult spot is because of Joe biden's hubris. Joe should have told the world he wasn't running in 2022 so Democrats could have had a normal election cycle. I liked Joe as a president and I think he did a great job but unfortunately a big part of his legacy is going to be how badly he botched the 2024 election cycle and how he screwed over the party
That kind of hypocrisy is what voters saw right through and part of the reason Kamala got smoked