***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Where was all the outrage when it was proven that the DNC rigged the election. Same cats talking that Russia talk tried to sweep it under the rug.

:{ the level of hypocrisy is ASTOUNDING.
 
Where was all the outrage when it was proven that the DNC rigged the election. Same cats talking that Russia talk tried to sweep it under the rug.

:{ the level of hypocrisy is ASTOUNDING.

You do realize that the inverse applies, right?

Where is all of your outrage right now to match your outrage with the DNC?
 
What should I be outraged at? Unlike you all I save my outrage for conclusive proof and at this point that remains to be seen. Unlike the DNC emails that have been seen.

Fake outrage as far as the eye can see.
 
Call me crazy, but there's something about the whole Russian involvement here that just ticks my outrage meter up a tad higher than the DNC stuff. Especially coming off that Secretary of State pick.
 
It's funny to watch you guys play this gotcha game with Ninja.

Y'all still don't get it, you don't win a culture war with facts, it's missing the point.



Trumps russian tires are well known by everyone, for the hardcore supporters they won't care as long as they are in on the con.
 
swendro, you are more outraged by a clandestine foreign operation led by an enemy state who has engaged in a massive campaign of espionage, hacking, and curated leaks (plus who knows what else) for years than you are by a party official having a preference for a candidate?

[crawls back under my protective alt-right rock composed of brietbart, fox news, /r/the_donald, and my mother gently kissing my 30+-year-old cheek as she puts me to bed every night]
 
Last edited:
actually i saw this live...try again

so you'll believe a baseless times article but are skeptical from da actual horse's mouth... :{ :lol


and you dont think there is a possibility that he could be lying or trying to save face?

da Times makes a false accusation....if da horse's mouth says no dice, why is this still "a thing"

Cool. The quote you pasted is still from The Daily Caller

and yet da actual substantive video calling BS on da article is on CNN... silence on that front ehh?

:lol

like i said, back to square one.
 
What should I be outraged at? Unlike you all I save my outrage for conclusive proof and at this point that remains to be seen. Unlike the DNC emails that have been seen.

Fake outrage as far as the eye can see.

Ahhh "fake outrage"...one of the most tried and untrue battle cries of the apathetic right

"It doesn't bother me, so everyone who is bothered by it must be faking" Right?

Just admit that you have zero issue with the revelation that Russia interfered with a US presidential election. Never mind their endgame or who their preferred candidate was. You have not spoken against their attempts to undermine our political process IN ANY CAPACITY. Instead, in typical thoughtless Rico fashion, you tried to flip it around and place the blame on Obama.

So you can just hush your baseless calls for others to remain consistent with their criticisms until you do so yourself
 
While the Titanic sank, the mice aboard were happier about the deserted kitchen than they were worried about saving their lives.
 
we all denounced any collusion by the DNC to influence the results of the primaries. most of us wanted DWS replaced. and we called for a more transparent primary. but we also maintained that it wasn't rigged, that Hillary would've won anyway, and that the leaks indicated preference but not a conspiracy.

plus that was months ago.

we're today talking about Russia interfering in our election. this is happening now.

it's why we're talking about it now.

you can keep your head in the sand but any doubt that the hoods aren't hopeless one-sided trump stans with no interest in a meaningful discussion is out the window now.

insufferably deplorable.
 
Ahhh "fake outrage"...one of the most tried and untrue battle cries of the apathetic right

"It doesn't bother me, so everyone who is bothered by it must be faking" Right?

Just admit that you have zero issue with the revelation that Russia interfered with a US presidential election. Never mind their endgame or who their preferred candidate was. You have not spoken against their attempts to undermine our political process IN ANY CAPACITY. Instead, in typical thoughtless Rico fashion, you tried to flip it around and place the blame on Obama.

So you can just hush your baseless calls for others to remain consistent with their criticisms until you do so yourself

Because all we really have as far as evidence that Russia influenced the election in favor of Trump is a CIA report. One of the most dubious organizations on the planet. So like I said I'm saving my outrage for when we get some more concrete evidence. But I will go on record as saying if it does turn out that Russia did intentionally try to swing the election to Trump I'd be just as angry as the rest of you. I'm an American first and I will not stand idly by while the commies try to undermine our Democracy.
 
And just so we're clear, I'll say it now

The way the DNC worked to bury Bernie was abhorrent

ehh read "the party decides"

they were doing what political parties have been doing forever, trying to select the establishments choice and discourge challengers.


1. it didn't even work.

2. it backfired on them in the end.


"abhorrent" is a several tokes over the line.
 
Last edited:
Abhorrent is a perfectly adequate word to describe what was done. And MILLIONS of American voices were silenced.
 
ehh read "the party decides"

they were doing what political parties have been doing forever, trying to select the establishments choice and discourge challengers.


1. it didn't even work.

2. it backfired on them in the end.


"abhorrent" is a several tokes over the line.

So it's supposed to be less offensive because it's a common practice? I don't buy that

Consider "abhorrent" hyperbole if you want
 
Abhorrent is a perfectly adequate word to describe what was done. And MILLIONS of American voices were silenced.

there is no evidence of any or this.


Bernie lost because he was less poluar than hillary with democratic primary voters.




he caught an clear decisive l.




what's funny is, Hilary Clinton had a way better argument in 08 that she was jobbed.
 
Back
Top Bottom