RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
Maybe Ninja should spend those 18 hours of the day learning about other stuff, not just fill his head with noise that he barely understand.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Do you even technology bro?
da Honda VX is 25 years old...u should be looking in da mirror.
Technology moves forward, i aint tryna go back 25 years [emoji]128129[/emoji]
Ehhh, just plug it in in the garage while you sleep n you good [emoji]128129[/emoji]
yeah, say hasta la vista to your electric bill
and da biggest irony is 66% of Telsas runs on coal & natural gas, da other 20% is nuclear..
[emoji]128129[/emoji] fab to that
When the roof of your HOUSE is covered in solar panels, charging a car overnight is lightwork [emoji]128170[/emoji]
go find out how long it takes for solar panels to generate enough electric power to fill da batteries of a Telsa... *psst*..it's gonna be a while *psst*
I appreciate that physics article though. They just got to bring the cost down. As long as they can recreate the sporty driving experience for the price I can afford, I'm good to switch over.
Republicans are really masochists.Sounds like rural schools going to take a hit under DeVos. Rural schools comprise most of middle America don't they. The ppl who voted for Trump [emoji]129300[/emoji]
That list of ppl regretting that they voted for Trump getting longer..
*edit
Maine carried Hillary though.
look at 4k TVs nowLast time I checked (a long time ago), the battery cost accounted for roughly 1/2 of the cost of electric cars, which explains their higher MSRP when they were introduced. With battery storage cost going down relative to their capacity, you now have the ability to make 30k all electric sedans with great range.
That's the thing about technology: if the idea is solid, the initial investment is one of the most significant barriers to overcome. After that, economies of scale and technical improvements eventually lower the price and make technology accessible to the general public. That is true for EV as it was true for the PC, combustion engine cars, electric distribution, 3d-printing, etc...
One last thing about how disingenuous NH is when it comes to EVs: nobody accounts for the amount of energy wasted to pull oil out of the ground, transport it from one continent to another, and refine it. Including the increased consumption of electeicity can only be valid if we also consider the ancillary costs of consuming gas.
I appreciate that physics article though. They just got to bring the cost down. As long as they can recreate the sporty driving experience for the price I can afford, I'm good to switch over.
they can't & haven't been able to because batteries Don't have da range, energy density, and charging speed capacity..
unless you come up with another battery tech (Graphene...which is expensive as ****) that can charge faster an pack energy with better density performance, Gasoline will be da big dog for decades+ to come.
You have a point about charging speed but I think they've already told you multiple times that energy density is not needed if the energy is spent more efficiently. And in that article they've already said that Tesla models are capable of covering the same distance on a single charge as a car that gets 35 miles to the gallon. That's pretty typical mpg rate for a car. I don't think even my gas powered car goes 35 mpg.
Didn't the auto industry have to be bailed out by the government [emoji]129300[/emoji]
unless you can charge a electric car as far as you can gas up a internal combustion car, da EV market will be relegated to niche status and States than mandate brands to sell a percentage of EV's to them.
Didn't the auto industry have to be bailed out by the government [emoji]129300[/emoji]
unless you can charge a electric car as far as you can gas up a internal combustion car, da EV market will be relegated to niche status and States than mandate brands to sell a percentage of EV's to them.
I'm convinced you never read man lol
He's too busy wasting his time watching tv. He'd rather just blindly defend fossil fuels because he wants automobile manufacturers to continue producing muscle cars that he can't buy.I'm convinced you never read man lol
Where would he find the time?
Sounds like rural schools going to take a hit under DeVos. Rural schools comprise most of middle America don't they. The ppl who voted for Trump [emoji]129300[/emoji]
That list of ppl regretting that they voted for Trump getting longer..
*edit
Maine carried Hillary though.
Republicans are really masochists.
I'm convinced you never read man lol
He's too busy wasting his time watching tv. He'd rather just blindly defend fossil fuels because he wants automobile manufacturers to continue producing muscle carsthat he can't buy.
Didn't the auto industry have to be bailed out by the government [emoji]129300[/emoji]
Ninja still ain't thank Obeezy for saving Da Hemi
You have a point about charging speed but I think they've already told you multiple times that energy density is not needed if the energy is spent more efficiently. And in that article they've already said that Tesla models are capable of covering the same distance on a single charge as a car that gets 35 miles to the gallon. That's pretty typical mpg rate for a car. I don't think even my gas powered car goes 35 mpg.
Stop being dense.
I'm convinced you never read man lol
He's too busy wasting his time watching tv. He'd rather just blindly defend fossil fuels because he wants automobile manufacturers to continue producing muscle carsthat he can't buy.
*sigh*
da larger point is artificially raising da price of energy for political ideology is stupid.
I'm glad we're all da wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy off that.
i didn't know da entire auto industry was 2 brands... [emoji]129300[/emoji]