- 69,616
- 106,161
Full on career suicide for her though, it's understandable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Full on career suicide for her though, it's understandable.
@BraddJaffy:
Putin admits “patriotically minded” private Russian hackers could have been involved in U.S. election interference
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/...eakingNews&contentID=65381707&pgtype=Homepage
@spectatorindex:
BREAKING: China and the EU will tomorrow express strong support for the 'historic achievement' of the Paris climate deal
Da Don can barely speak/write fluent English, much less a different languageThis *****....
Cassandra FairbanksVerified account @CassandraRules 6h
"Cov fe'fe is "I will stand up" in Arabic. It was right after the bombing in Kabul.
To quote a failed politician:
"Delete your account."
so dude is fluent in ******* arabic now...?
This *****....
Cassandra FairbanksVerified account @CassandraRules 6h
"Cov fe'fe is "I will stand up" in Arabic. It was right after the bombing in Kabul.
To quote a failed politician:
"Delete your account."
so dude is fluent in ******* arabic now...?
This *****....
Cassandra FairbanksVerified account @CassandraRules 6h
"Cov fe'fe is "I will stand up" in Arabic. It was right after the bombing in Kabul.
To quote a failed politician:
"Delete your account."
so dude is fluent in ******* arabic now...?
Another campaign promise broken—President Trump delays moving U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem
You're such a cunning linguistsawf 'aqaf
I will stand
[h1]The Republicans who urged Trump to pull out of Paris deal are big oil darlings[/h1]
Twenty-two senators wrote a letter to the president when he was said to be on the fence about backing out. They received more than $10m from oil, gas and coal companies the past three election cycles
A withdrawal by Donald Trump from the Paris climate accord would go down as a hallmark of his presidency. It would be unilateral, reckless and splashy – trademark Trump. The president has said he will announce his decision at 3pm ET (8pm BST) on Thursday.
But while Trump has often stood on a range of issues as a maverick outlier from mainstream Republican politics, on climate change he is at the centre of the party’s orthodoxy. Trump’s disbelief in climate change and imminent decision on whether to support the Paris agreement reflects an area of unusual agreement between the president and elected Republicans, whose track record of climate change denialism is plain and long.
Unmissable behind the elected Republicans stand other interests: the oil, gas and coal industries, which together are some of the most influential donors to Republican candidates.
The big-money supporters got a return on their investment last week, when 22 Republican senators whose campaigns have collected more than $10m in oil, gas and coal money since 2012 sent a letter to the president urging him to withdraw from the Paris deal.
Trump had been said to be on the fence about the deal. Members of his inner circle, including his daughter, were reported to favor staying in.
“We strongly encourage you to make a clean break from the Paris Agreement,” read the letter, drafted by Wyoming’s John Barrasso, chairman of the Senate committee on environment and public works, and Oklahoma’s Jim Inhofe, a longtime climate change denier and senior member of that committee.
The letter argued that the Paris deal threatened Trump’s efforts to rescind the clean power plan, an Obama-era set of regulations and guidelines that include emissions caps and other rules deemed onerous by the fossil fuel industries.
It was not as if Trump wanted for advisers urging him to withdraw from the Paris deal even before the letter was sent. Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt and chief strategist Stephen Bannon urged withdrawal, while energy secretary Rick Perry favored renegotiation.
Public opposition to the deal from almost two dozen senators just as the president prepared to make his decision, however, demonstrated the extent to which the opponents of the Paris deal were organized, ready to strike and to offer important political cover if Trump pulls the US out of the historic global deal.
Donations from oil, gas and coal interests to the signatories of the letter are Open Secrets that seemed ready for a new review. A Guardian survey of Federal Elections Commission data organized by the Center for Responsive Politics found that the industries gave a total of $10,694,284 to the 22 senators over the past three election cycles.
Visible donations to Republicans from those industries exceeded donations to Democrats in the 2016 election cycle by a ratio of 15-to-1, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And that does not include so-called dark money passed from oil interests such as Koch industries to general slush funds to re-elect Republicans such as the Senate leadership fund.
At least $90m in untraceable money has been funneled to Republican candidates from oil, gas and coal interests in the past three election cycles, according to Federal Election Commission disclosures analyzed by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Here is a breakdown for the past three election cycles (2012, 2014 and 2016).
[h2]James Inhofe, Oklahoma[/h2]
Oil & gas: $465,950
Coal: $63,600
Total: $529,550
[h2]John Barrasso, Wyoming[/h2]
Oil & gas: $458,466
Coal: $127,356
Total: $585,822
[h2]Mitch McConnell, Kentucky[/h2]
Oil & gas: $1,180,384
Coal: $361,700
Total: $1,542,084
[h2]John Cornyn, Texas[/h2]
Oil & gas: $1,101,456
Coal: $33,050
Total: $1,134,506
[h2]Roy Blunt, Missouri[/h2]
Oil & gas: $353,864
Coal: $96,000
Total: $449,864
[h2]Roger Wicker, Mississippi[/h2]
Oil & gas: $198,816
Coal: $25,376
Total: $224,192
[h2]Michael Enzi, Wyoming[/h2]
Oil & gas: $211,083
Coal: $63,300
Total: $274,383
[h2]Mike Crapo, Idaho[/h2]
Oil & gas: $110,250
Coal: $26,756
Total: $137,006
[h2]Jim Risch, Idaho[/h2]
Oil & gas: $123,850
Coal: $25,680
Total: $149,530
[h2]Thad Cochran, Mississippi[/h2]
Oil & gas: $276,905
Coal: $15,000
Total: $291,905
[h2]Mike Rounds, South Dakota[/h2]
Oil & gas: $201,900
Coal: none
Total: $201,900
[h2]Rand Paul, Kentucky[/h2]
Oil & gas: $170,215
Coal: $82,571
Total: $252,786
[h2]John Boozman, Arkansas[/h2]
Oil & gas: $147,930
Coal: $2,000
Total: $149,930
[h2]Richard Shelby, Alabama[/h2]
Oil & gas: $60,150
Coal: $2,500
Total: $62,650
[h2]Luther Strange, Alabama[/h2]
(Appointed in 2017, running in 2017 special election)
Total: NA
[h2]Orrin Hatch, Utah[/h2]
Oil & gas: $446,250
Coal: $25,000
Total: $471,250
[h2]Mike Lee, Utah[/h2]
Oil & gas: $231,520
Coal: $21,895
Total: $253,415
[h2]Ted Cruz, Texas[/h2]
Oil & gas: $2,465,910
Coal: $103,900
Total: $2,569,810
[h2]David Perdue, Georgia[/h2]
Oil & gas: $184,250
Coal: $0
Total: $184,250
[h2]Thom Tillis, North Carolina[/h2]
Oil & gas: $263,400
Coal: $0
Total: $263,400
[h2]Tim Scott, South Carolina[/h2]
Oil & gas: $490,076
Coal: $58,200
Total: $548,276
[h2]Pat Roberts, Kansas[/h2]
Oil & gas: $388,950
Coal: $28,825
Total: $417,775
Sum total for all 22 Republican signatories: $10,694,284
Cassandra is full of covfefe with this bs translationThis *****....
Cassandra FairbanksVerified account @CassandraRules 6h
"Cov fe'fe is "I will stand up" in Arabic. It was right after the bombing in Kabul.
To quote a failed politician:
"Delete your account."
so dude is fluent in ******* arabic now...?
Anyone been following the UK general election campaign?
The incumbent conservative PM had a 24 point lead in the polls when she called the election a little over a month ago and now according to this week's polls,her lead over the Labour party and it's leader that the media deemed 'unelectable' not long ago has evaporated to just 3 points with a week left before polls open...
Pretty mad given how short campaign seasons are in the UK,to make up almost a 20 point defect in a matter of weeks is insane :x
She didn't help herself by skipping the last debate and all of her opponents took turns ethering her .
Looks like the British press smearing of Corbyn has had an opposite effect,his support has soared once folks actually listened to the mans ideas. Labours manifesto, or platform, has been winning people over while Mays numbers crater.
She's still slightly favored but it's looking like her idea to call early elections to solidify a majority for her mandate will backfire in her face big time. If she wins it'll be real close it looks like and she'll probably need a coalition to govern.
It's been refreshing to see real progressive momentum and gains there after Brexit last year. The 'far left radical' who survived a coup attempt by the moderates in his own party last year,is currently more popular with voters than the incumbent