I was planning to have a real inside baseballish post about California politics but this graphic sums it up very well, this "New California" scheme would fail on its own merits. Maybe, this new State could get a Republican governor from time to time but otherwise, it would be a blue State. Plus, the remaining part of California would be so blue, we could not only shutout Republicans, we'd have a room for greens, DSA and independents/socialists legislators and Congresspeople and even Senators.
Republicans are just running out of room in California. The Central Coast, Orange County, the Inland Empire, parts of the Central Valley and the Sierra Nevada Mountains have or are turning blue. In 2018, it is extremely likely that the California 25th will flip from red to blue which means that Simi Valley, Lilly White Simi Valley, Rodney King Simi Valley will be in a blue district.
rexanglorum
That article sounds like the pacifying comments of r/trumpgret whenever someone admits to having made a mistake by supporting Trump.
Nothing short of an apology will allow Trump supporters to reintegrate the political discourse with our respect. It's cool to quote Desmond Tutu, and it is even more important to highlight that the Commission for Truth and Reconciliation that South Africans held at the end of apartheid required the former members of the tyrannical government to confess their crimes and publicly apologize.
Apologies are owed to all of us.
I totally agree. The South African model is ideal wince that is what Trump and the GOP have done and are attempting to do; to turn the US into South Africa. Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela found the right, middle path which was more clemency than the victors of the American Revolution showed to American loyalists but more accountability and discipline than the North showed the defeated South after the American Civil War.
Again, the main reason I posted the Frum article is show that we do need a fierce but good faith opposition in our own little forum here and in Democratic Nations, more broadly.
I think that in our forum and in other left leaning spaces, we have developed some bad intellectual habits because we, understandably, don't want to engage with conservative voices; because so many conservative voices simply hate us or hate our friends and allies on account of our identities.
A prime example is how we all too often think that Trump's supporters are exclusively low income white and this article by Frum pushed back a bit and helped to clarify.
Even more though provoking was how he linked boomers to whiteness and millennials to non whiteness. In addition, he didn't defend tea party buffoonery but he is right that "keep your government hands of my medicare" did not mean that tea partiers are all rubes who don't know how medicare is funded. In reality, they mean something more ominous which is "I'll let young, poor and colored people die if that's what it takes to keep my low cost healthcare."
Engaging with dishonest, bad fait hand hateful conservatives is fruitless emotional labor, especially for people with marginalized identities. However, a tough, though provoking read by a good faith opponent is like a quality workout of basketball practice. You might feel a little out of breath and off balance but you come out stronger and better.