- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
I didn't take issue with what you said because in my response to you I just reiterated criticism of the meme. You were the one that is taking issue with the content of other people's posts. You are the one that shifted the discussion in that direction.follow me here. if it was about someone in the GOP I fully believe it would have just been repped or scrolled over no matter the level of absurdity. that’s my entire point.
I made a general statement about memes that poke fun at dems and libs getting a certain response here. that I think only you responded to this conversation is happening because you quoted me. that’s it. you took issue with what I said and you responded thusly.
hyper analyzing was the long post I quoted. hyper analyzing was an exaggeration, like the meme
the basis - not all memes and dumb jokes get the same attention.
examples - lawyer and fast food jokes, pedo jokes, incest jokes, ones about how dumb conservatives are, dwalks unwashed chalkboard legs, coalgang maga bro posts, and ninjahood jokes continue on in perpetuity
I don’t need to reach to support any of the above and I have no idea what your point is
I just wanna laugh at dumb stuff man. everybody takes everything so damn seriously
I get what you are saying about people acting differently depending on the target. I am saying the evidence here you are using to argue your point is weak as ****. Especially if you want to call out my comments. I said what 5 words dismissing it and kept it pushing, and that is somehow it is an emotional response.
That is what I am pointing out is you are just making reaches to argue your point. That you call out some activity that is not actually happening. Your point about people have different behaviors might be valid, but the evidence you point to doesn't really exist.
Now it seems like you are just repeating yourself to act like your point is just going over my head. That I just refuse to see what you are clearly pointing out. I get your point, you still don't have clear examples to support it from in here. You are mostly just exaggerating people's behaviors, and you think me calling that out doesn't take away from your point. And I think it does because that is kind of a strawman
If you want to laugh and dumb stuff, then go ahead and do that. No one is stopping you, no one is dictating your experience on NT. But if that is what you want to do, I dunno why you felt the need to start with this nonsense. Even if people were doing what you were asserting, how does that affect you?
And I swear, this is one of the dumbest **** that goes on NT. That I respect people enough to explain my position in detail and in response I get these comments about "taking **** too seriously". Like would it be better if I was flippant toward you and didn't try to explain my position?
So again, miss me.
Last edited: