I wanted to love The Pacific but it wasn't as good as BoB. I also found I didn't develop the investment in the characters in Pacific that I had with BoB with the exception of John Seda's Basilone. His story/history was really really sad. Also liked the job Seda did. He was kinda unknown at the time & I thought he was going to be big. Also really liked Rami Malek & thought at the time he stood out.
I don't ordinarily complain about battle scenes because I like action especially in BoB but The Pacific battles scenes lasted soo long. Some of them were like 10--12 mins long. I guess it was to illustrate how grueling they were.
Sidebar about the flick - I know historically, the Peleliu Battle was only supposed to last days but stretched to bloody months. Whats crazy is historians said the battle didn't even take place because the island wasn't pivotal at all to win the war of the Pacific. It apparently came down to 2 admirals. One that argued the battle wasn't needed & the other who said it was.
I think this was the battle scene that was like 15 mins long.
All in all I found The Pacific to be satisfactory where as I found BoB to be stellar. I'd give it like a 6/8 on the NT movie thread scale. I did appreciate the attempt to make a well crafted mini series like BoB was, I just think they fell kinda short.
What did you think? I've found most people with opinions about both feel the same way.