- 44,086
- 16,486
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
With that post being said and keeping this separate I too read the conversations as they unfolded and I noticed that Ceballos brought it up many times as well, BUT never once did I feel like he was justifying it, defending people who would run over protesters or implying that he himself would participate in it.
I could tell he just didn't think that was the best way to protest for the reasons he listed, and it ended there.
I don't think he's being sly or slick in trying to communicate that he is okaying anybody being run over during a protest, but that if you put yourself in that situation to be run over, you have to be prepared for the consequence of being run over.
There is a cause and affect to every action, he's just acknowledging that. If you don't want to get hit, don't block traffic on the highway.
I could tell he just didn't think that was the best way to protest for the reasons he listed, and it ended there.
I don't think he's being sly or slick in trying to communicate that he is okaying anybody being run over during a protest, but that if you put yourself in that situation to be run over, you have to be prepared for the consequence of being run over.
There is a cause and affect to every action, he's just acknowledging that. If you don't want to get hit, don't block traffic on the highway.