- 17,992
- 4,839
- Joined
- May 28, 2009
^ Dude I answered your question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
I really don't care about which system sells more. FF13 copies. I probably won't even be buying it.
As far as sony playing catch up. What are you trying to say about the controllers? And achievements and trophies mean nothing.
And yes for the most part Live is better. But you fanboys act like its way better. And its not.
You Xbox dudes not ready to make games better than ever ? To see stuff you never seen?
Ok find, MS does not own Mass Effect, it is still exclusive. They have no exclusivity agreement in place for Valve games but they are exclusive.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I know people call me a Xbox fan boy but I will never go as far as to make @%%$ up like you. Lost Planet and Dead Rising where not on PS3 because SONY, yes SONY was late deliving dev kits. As for Bioshock Ken Levine is the one that siad his stuido 2K Boston would not develop a PS3 version, Take-Two took it upon themselves to create a new stuido to port and develop BioShock games. There was never, never, never any written agreements for those games. Ninja Gaiden just had timed exclusivity, because Itagaki only likes developing for the Xbox during production.
im not trying to make up anything, you need to read my other posts buddy, this laker guy is talking about "xbox can hold onto its exclusives unlike sony" and im trying to say of course they can - those exclusives are owned by microsoft
Are you that Ricky dude that used to troll the PS3 thread?Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I know people call me a Xbox fan boy but I will never go as far as to make @%%$ up like you. Lost Planet and Dead Rising where not on PS3 because SONY, yes SONY was late deliving dev kits. As for Bioshock Ken Levine is the one that siad his stuido 2K Boston would not develop a PS3 version, Take-Two took it upon themselves to create a new stuido to port and develop BioShock games. There was never, never, never any written agreements for those games. Ninja Gaiden just had timed exclusivity, because Itagaki only likes developing for the Xbox during production.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Aleast 360 can keep its exclusives exclusive while PS3 is dying for money and selling one of there 2 big games (FF and MGS).Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
But 360 users answer this. If your system is better, why do they have to dumb down FFXIII just so it can be on the 360?
what exclusives are you talking about? halo? gears? forza? franchises that are actually owned by microsoft? do we really need to get into franchises actually owned by sony?
and why are you comparing current generation exclusives (360) to previous generation exclusives for ps3 like FF and MGS?
how about we talk about this generation exclusives lost like Lost Planet, BioShock, Dead Rising, Star Ocean, tales of vesperia, ninja gaiden, etc - wow some exclusives, microsoft couldnt even lock em down for a full console generation
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Ok find, MS does not own Mass Effect, it is still exclusive. They have no exclusivity agreement in place for Valve games but they are exclusive.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I know people call me a Xbox fan boy but I will never go as far as to make @%%$ up like you. Lost Planet and Dead Rising where not on PS3 because SONY, yes SONY was late deliving dev kits. As for Bioshock Ken Levine is the one that siad his stuido 2K Boston would not develop a PS3 version, Take-Two took it upon themselves to create a new stuido to port and develop BioShock games. There was never, never, never any written agreements for those games. Ninja Gaiden just had timed exclusivity, because Itagaki only likes developing for the Xbox during production.
im not trying to make up anything, you need to read my other posts buddy, this laker guy is talking about "xbox can hold onto its exclusives unlike sony" and im trying to say of course they can - those exclusives are owned by microsoft
Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Originally Posted by His diabolical Majesty
Don't care about FF, I guess 360 can't handle the pure awesomeness on FF? As for the d pad... I got this bad boyOriginally Posted by JAYFIEND
Originally Posted by His diabolical Majesty
Tekken & MGS on the 360 is what I'm looking forward toOriginally Posted by Lakersfan1
Aleast 360 can keep its exclusives exclusive while PS3 is dying for money and selling one of there 2 big games (FF and MGS).Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
But 360 users answer this. If your system is better, why do they have to dumb down FFXIII just so it can be on the 360?
You didnt answer my question. You completly changed the subject.And play Tekken with tat dpad?good luck.!
Yea I forgot about that.Good answer.And yes 360 can't handle the pure awesomeness of FF.
Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX. -Rusty
I really don't care about which system sells more. FF13 copies. I probably won't even be buying it.Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
Sony is playing catch up. Look back at its online support last generation, the PS2 compared to the Xbox. The gap created back then still has not been closed. Xbox made its controller better, most consider it the best ever, what did Sony do, same design but a Sixxas/Dualshock controversy and dudes buying trigger attachments so their controllers to be more like the 360's.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I really don't care about which system sells more. FF13 copies. I probably won't even be buying it.Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
As far as sony playing catch up. What are you trying to say about the controllers? And achievements and trophies mean nothing.
And yes for the most part Live is better. But you fanboys act like its way better. And its not.
You Xbox dudes not ready to make games better than ever ? To see stuff you never seen?
Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Sony is playing catch up. Look back at its online support last generation, the PS2 compared to the Xbox. The gap created back then still has not been closed. Xbox made its controller better, most consider it the best ever, what did Sony do, same design but a Sixxas/Dualshock controversy and dudes buying trigger attachments so their controllers to be more like the 360's.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I really don't care about which system sells more. FF13 copies. I probably won't even be buying it.Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
As far as sony playing catch up. What are you trying to say about the controllers? And achievements and trophies mean nothing.
And yes for the most part Live is better. But you fanboys act like its way better. And its not.
You Xbox dudes not ready to make games better than ever ? To see stuff you never seen?
Achievements came first, then Sony brought in their bastard version with trophies. You may not think they matter but millions of others do. And live is way better buddy, people think it is only cross game chat Xbox owners pay $50 for, but it is to get exclusive original games like Trials HD and Shadow Complex, to get games and demos earlier, to get exclusive DLC and map pack earlier. M$ takes the profits for Live and spends it to make Live better and better. What incentive does Sony have to invest in a service they are giving away for free? I''ll tell you, little to nothing. Oh by the way when exactly is Home suppose to revolutionize the online gaming experience because I have been waiting, waiting, and waiting for that to happen.
Sony was arrogant from day one, launching at $600, telling devs it was a privilege to develop on their console, saying the next generation begins with them. All those were dumbs +%% moves Sony is paying for now and fanboys still defend. If someone wants to buy a PS3, thats hood, it is a great system with a lot to offer, but my opinion is was 360 has way more to offer and the places the 360 falls short and not as bad as the places PS3 falls short
Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Sony is playing catch up. Look back at its online support last generation, the PS2 compared to the Xbox. The gap created back then still has not been closed. Xbox made its controller better, most consider it the best ever, what did Sony do, same design but a Sixxas/Dualshock controversy and dudes buying trigger attachments so their controllers to be more like the 360's.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I really don't care about which system sells more. FF13 copies. I probably won't even be buying it.Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
As far as sony playing catch up. What are you trying to say about the controllers? And achievements and trophies mean nothing.
And yes for the most part Live is better. But you fanboys act like its way better. And its not.
You Xbox dudes not ready to make games better than ever ? To see stuff you never seen?
Achievements came first, then Sony brought in their bastard version with trophies. You may not think they matter but millions of others do. And live is way better buddy, people think it is only cross game chat Xbox owners pay $50 for, but it is to get exclusive original games like Trials HD and Shadow Complex, to get games and demos earlier, to get exclusive DLC and map pack earlier. M$ takes the profits for Live and spends it to make Live better and better. What incentive does Sony have to invest in a service they are giving away for free? I''ll tell you, little to nothing. Oh by the way when exactly is Home suppose to revolutionize the online gaming experience because I have been waiting, waiting, and waiting for that to happen.
Sony was arrogant from day one, launching at $600, telling devs it was a privilege to develop on their console, saying the next generation begins with them. All those were dumbs +%% moves Sony is paying for now and fanboys still defend. If someone wants to buy a PS3, thats hood, it is a great system with a lot to offer, but my opinion is was 360 has way more to offer and the places the 360 falls short and not as bad as the places PS3 falls short
Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Sony is playing catch up. Look back at its online support last generation, the PS2 compared to the Xbox. The gap created back then still has not been closed. Xbox made its controller better, most consider it the best ever, what did Sony do, same design but a Sixxas/Dualshock controversy and dudes buying trigger attachments so their controllers to be more like the 360's.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
I really don't care about which system sells more. FF13 copies. I probably won't even be buying it.Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
Going back to the argument at hand. Choosing either console would be a good choice. But I just think that the Xbox has much more to offer in terms of games. PS3 is more reliable but Xbox has better online. Also Sony plays catch up with MS and fanboys never recognize it: Online, achievements, contollers, dev support. Lasty FF13 was not dumbed down, Square Enix said so, Sony fanboys are holding onto a BS claim just to make themselves feel better when more copies are sold on the XBOX.
As far as sony playing catch up. What are you trying to say about the controllers? And achievements and trophies mean nothing.
And yes for the most part Live is better. But you fanboys act like its way better. And its not.
You Xbox dudes not ready to make games better than ever ? To see stuff you never seen?
Achievements came first, then Sony brought in their bastard version with trophies. You may not think they matter but millions of others do. And live is way better buddy, people think it is only cross game chat Xbox owners pay $50 for, but it is to get exclusive original games like Trials HD and Shadow Complex, to get games and demos earlier, to get exclusive DLC and map pack earlier. M$ takes the profits for Live and spends it to make Live better and better. What incentive does Sony have to invest in a service they are giving away for free? I''ll tell you, little to nothing. Oh by the way when exactly is Home suppose to revolutionize the online gaming experience because I have been waiting, waiting, and waiting for that to happen.
Sony was arrogant from day one, launching at $600, telling devs it was a privilege to develop on their console, saying the next generation begins with them. All those were dumbs +%% moves Sony is paying for now and fanboys still defend. If someone wants to buy a PS3, thats hood, it is a great system with a lot to offer, but my opinion is was 360 has way more to offer and the places the 360 falls short and not as bad as the places PS3 falls short
xbox is getting watered down versions of metal gear solid and final fantasy so I don't see your point. And yes, you do seem extra mad in allof these points. i hope you have microsoft stock or something.Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Bioshock they got greedy and its watered downOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Aleast 360 can keep its exclusives exclusive while PS3 is dying for money and selling one of there 2 big games (FF and MGS).Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
But 360 users answer this. If your system is better, why do they have to dumb down FFXIII just so it can be on the 360?
what exclusives are you talking about? halo? gears? forza? franchises that are actually owned by microsoft? do we really need to get into franchises actually owned by sony?
and why are you comparing current generation exclusives (360) to previous generation exclusives for ps3 like FF and MGS?
how about we talk about this generation exclusives lost like Lost Planet, BioShock, Dead Rising, Star Ocean, tales of vesperia, ninja gaiden, etc - wow some exclusives, microsoft couldnt even lock em down for a full console generation
And you know this because you played both games.................... oh that's right you just talking out your +%%Originally Posted by DubA169
xbox is getting watered down versions of metal gear solid and final fantasy so I don't see your point. And yes, you do seem extra mad in all of these points. i hope you have microsoft stock or something.Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Bioshock they got greedy and its watered downOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Aleast 360 can keep its exclusives exclusive while PS3 is dying for money and selling one of there 2 big games (FF and MGS).Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
But 360 users answer this. If your system is better, why do they have to dumb down FFXIII just so it can be on the 360?
what exclusives are you talking about? halo? gears? forza? franchises that are actually owned by microsoft? do we really need to get into franchises actually owned by sony?
and why are you comparing current generation exclusives (360) to previous generation exclusives for ps3 like FF and MGS?
how about we talk about this generation exclusives lost like Lost Planet, BioShock, Dead Rising, Star Ocean, tales of vesperia, ninja gaiden, etc - wow some exclusives, microsoft couldnt even lock em down for a full console generation
Originally Posted by bsktball4lyf3
XBO 360 foreverrr
My gt is :its an orange
hit me up ill play halo wit u
metal gear rising on xbox will not look as good as mgs4 on ps3. There is no debate for this. This is what the guy is talking about with microsoftholding the industry hostage. metal gear rising is going to be subpar graphically for the ps3 also because it's gonna look the same as the xbox version.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
And you know this because you played both games.................... oh that's right you just talking out your +%%Originally Posted by DubA169
xbox is getting watered down versions of metal gear solid and final fantasy so I don't see your point. And yes, you do seem extra mad in all of these points. i hope you have microsoft stock or something.Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Bioshock they got greedy and its watered downOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by Lakersfan1
Aleast 360 can keep its exclusives exclusive while PS3 is dying for money and selling one of there 2 big games (FF and MGS).Originally Posted by JAYFIEND
But 360 users answer this. If your system is better, why do they have to dumb down FFXIII just so it can be on the 360?
what exclusives are you talking about? halo? gears? forza? franchises that are actually owned by microsoft? do we really need to get into franchises actually owned by sony?
and why are you comparing current generation exclusives (360) to previous generation exclusives for ps3 like FF and MGS?
how about we talk about this generation exclusives lost like Lost Planet, BioShock, Dead Rising, Star Ocean, tales of vesperia, ninja gaiden, etc - wow some exclusives, microsoft couldnt even lock em down for a full console generation
Originally Posted by Shoes N BasketBall
Xbox 360, doesn't seem it can get any better,
except add a little gun's to there fps, with a small 3 hour storyline.
and new vehicles,
that's all i see upcoming in there new games.
EDIT:
only thing keepin it alive,
is ODST,And H3 Fans.