- 1,370
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2009
Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
Originally Posted by ArsnalJ23
My 6th birthday, '88. I'm on the far left
Looks like your friend in the grey is doing the Dougie
PYP vol: When I was growing up edition
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by stockholm patriot,
- Start date
- 1,370
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2009
Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
Originally Posted by ArsnalJ23
My 6th birthday, '88. I'm on the far left
Looks like your friend in the grey is doing the Dougie
- 36,170
- 5,756
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2007
- 36,170
- 5,756
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2007
- 4,775
- 1,339
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- 4,775
- 1,339
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- 10,857
- 67
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- 10,857
- 67
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- 3,137
- 2,859
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
Haters gon hate
I got 10 bathrooms I can #t all day.
Godparents
- 3,137
- 2,859
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
Haters gon hate
I got 10 bathrooms I can #t all day.
Godparents
- 3,160
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
Originally Posted by NachoBroadway
Haters gon hate
Got 10 bathrooms I can sh#t all day.
Godparents
Is this your son in this pic with you?
If so, +!%% you guys look alike.
- 3,160
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
Originally Posted by NachoBroadway
Haters gon hate
Got 10 bathrooms I can sh#t all day.
Godparents
Is this your son in this pic with you?
If so, +!%% you guys look alike.
- 3,827
- 31
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
Shawtys know I will make cute kids. #swag #swag
- 3,827
- 31
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
Shawtys know I will make cute kids. #swag #swag
- 3,137
- 2,859
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
That's my son, no need for Maury Povich.Originally Posted by bittersweet
Is this your son in this pic with you?
If so, +!%% you guys look alike.
- 3,137
- 2,859
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
That's my son, no need for Maury Povich.Originally Posted by bittersweet
Is this your son in this pic with you?
If so, +!%% you guys look alike.
- 2,998
- 10
- Joined
- May 28, 2005
dirty, so you know, i edited my "comparison" before i seen your post.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
....
did you even read my previous replies?
I HAVE kept this topic open regardless of the 1 fool.
- 2,998
- 10
- Joined
- May 28, 2005
dirty, so you know, i edited my "comparison" before i seen your post.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
....
did you even read my previous replies?
I HAVE kept this topic open regardless of the 1 fool.
- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
wow, spittin image...coolOriginally Posted by NachoBroadway
That's my son, no need for Maury Povich.Originally Posted by bittersweet
Is this your son in this pic with you?
If so, +!%% you guys look alike.
- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
wow, spittin image...coolOriginally Posted by NachoBroadway
That's my son, no need for Maury Povich.Originally Posted by bittersweet
Is this your son in this pic with you?
If so, +!%% you guys look alike.
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
Originally Posted by moonmaster3
Posting a disclaimer doesn't have the effect of granting mass-exemption from NikeTalk's community rules. Allowing one post in which users are free to disrespect one another undermines the rule. We don't want our members to feel rewarded for insulting other users. It spills out into other threads.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
....
did you even read my previous replies?
I HAVE kept this topic open regardless of the 1 fool.
ps. before the debate even starts about PYP's...
We've tried allowing them on condition that those who participate 1) keep it respectful and 2) report violations immediately (without quoting them and creating even more work for the staff.)
It hasn't worked. Users don't bother to do their part to report the violations and therefore share the burden of operating the thread with our staff. We have literally thousands of new posts each day to worry about. It's unfair to have ONE thread everyone knows will be problematic to dominate our attention and create an inordinate amount of work when there's so much else to do in order to keep NikeTalk safe and respectful.
The PYP threads were originally intended as a community-building exercise. Users got to know one another better and put faces to names. The goal was to have people recognize that they're dealing with other human beings so that everyone would treat each other accordingly.
If that's the type of thread you guys actually wanted and you were willing to do your share to make it happen, I'd be happy to help give it a chance. From what I gather, that's not what people want. Instead, people just want cheap laughs at other users' expense - and we're not going to allow that. If it's about making fun of other NikeTalk members, it's just not going to happen.
Isn't there an implicit understanding that if you post your pics, there is a chance you will get flamed? At this point, who would really post their pics NOT knowing what might happen? Hell, you have people who intentionally post goofy pics of themselves to give others a cheap laugh at their own expense. I'm not sure who the you guys(mods) are really trying to protect.
There should be an implicit understanding that NTers should follow the rules and NOT flame....not expect that b/c of the way PYP's have gone that the rules will be ignored.
bottom line. PYP's have shown time and time again... people just don't follow the rules...thus...they're gone.
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
Originally Posted by moonmaster3
Posting a disclaimer doesn't have the effect of granting mass-exemption from NikeTalk's community rules. Allowing one post in which users are free to disrespect one another undermines the rule. We don't want our members to feel rewarded for insulting other users. It spills out into other threads.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
....
did you even read my previous replies?
I HAVE kept this topic open regardless of the 1 fool.
ps. before the debate even starts about PYP's...
We've tried allowing them on condition that those who participate 1) keep it respectful and 2) report violations immediately (without quoting them and creating even more work for the staff.)
It hasn't worked. Users don't bother to do their part to report the violations and therefore share the burden of operating the thread with our staff. We have literally thousands of new posts each day to worry about. It's unfair to have ONE thread everyone knows will be problematic to dominate our attention and create an inordinate amount of work when there's so much else to do in order to keep NikeTalk safe and respectful.
The PYP threads were originally intended as a community-building exercise. Users got to know one another better and put faces to names. The goal was to have people recognize that they're dealing with other human beings so that everyone would treat each other accordingly.
If that's the type of thread you guys actually wanted and you were willing to do your share to make it happen, I'd be happy to help give it a chance. From what I gather, that's not what people want. Instead, people just want cheap laughs at other users' expense - and we're not going to allow that. If it's about making fun of other NikeTalk members, it's just not going to happen.
Isn't there an implicit understanding that if you post your pics, there is a chance you will get flamed? At this point, who would really post their pics NOT knowing what might happen? Hell, you have people who intentionally post goofy pics of themselves to give others a cheap laugh at their own expense. I'm not sure who the you guys(mods) are really trying to protect.
There should be an implicit understanding that NTers should follow the rules and NOT flame....not expect that b/c of the way PYP's have gone that the rules will be ignored.
bottom line. PYP's have shown time and time again... people just don't follow the rules...thus...they're gone.
davedollars
Banned
- 815
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
davedollars
Banned
- 815
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- 23,378
- 6,001
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
Had the eyebrow at a early age, lol, and the dried out jeri curl
