- 3,995
- 4,930
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
the main issue with the whole movement^
for some reason... blacks (my people) think that being organized and having a hierarchy is not necessary to be a successful movement....
social media generation
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
the main issue with the whole movement^
if someone is guilty of a crime they go to court not murdered in the street like dogs
ill err on the side of them never being justified vs always being justified
however that wasnt even the point that was being made
you can jump to that conclusion simply to be contrary but my point is deeper than that
once we start deciding who and who isnt worth marching for, its over
those crowd will get smaller and smaller because whos going to march when no one would be willing to march for you
it has to be all of us even the lowest common denominator
when "gangbangers" and "criminals" see something wrong and are willing to march and unite it becomes a problem
RIP sleazyy
As the story above shows, Rosa Parks wasn't the only Black person who refused to give up her seat. Why do you think the teenage, single mother wasn't chosen as symbol of the civil rights struggle? She would have been easy to discredit in the 50s.
BLM needs to pick their symbols carefully. It will make their cause stronger. Doesn't mean that those who are not publicly acknowledged won't benefit from the changes the group is pushing for.
Even guilty gangbangers. Got it.Everyone's life matters.
Why wouldn't it?Even guilty gangbangers. Got it.Everyone's life matters.
i never i said unequivocally dont side with the police
Even guilty gangbangers. Got it.Everyone's life matters.
why stop there?
i never i said unequivocally dont side with the police
you created the instance in which it has be one or the other
i choose the other vs the one in an absolute scenario like you posed
the minute we start parsing through and deciding who was "justified" and who wasnt we've already lost
once we start judging who's worthy and whos not we have divided ourselves to be conquered
Umm...all those other things you just listed are silly.why stop there?
lets include traffic violators, misdemeanor non violent offenders, hell anyone who ever has had any mark against them for anything
RIP sleazyy
As the story above shows, Rosa Parks wasn't the only Black person who refused to give up her seat. Why do you think the teenage, single mother wasn't chosen as symbol of the civil rights struggle? She would have been easy to discredit in the 50s.
BLM needs to pick their symbols carefully. It will make their cause stronger. Doesn't mean that those who are not publicly acknowledged won't benefit from the changes the group is pushing for.
Yes I knew this and I agree. I chose Rosa Parks as an easy reference to make the point. Every black person practicing civil disobedience back then was a "criminal" and unreasonable. It's why I don't get the "always be reasonable" narrative.
Yes even them. They have loved ones, they have lives, many of them have dreams and aspirations. They matter.
Many of those gangs started as a means of protection against people who thought their lives didn't matter and they ended up where they are today. So maybe if people acted right from the start and knew the value of a life, you wouldn't be sitting here talking that dumb ****.
You reaching....as usual
why stop there?
lets include traffic violators, misdemeanor non violent offenders, hell anyone who ever has had any mark against them for anything
Organized gangs don't exist in the Mil, like that. Besides prolly LK there realy aren't ranks or shotcallers for qny black gangs. There's big homies and "ogs" but they dont have any juice or influnce to stop the kids from doing what they do. Really it's more so street cliques, and the old *** black panthers came out of retirement here in the last couple weeks.I heard LK's and GD's out there are uniting.
I don't see why some of you don't understand that you have to pick and choose your martyrs and causes wisely if you want a successful movement. Especially if you claim that white people are actively looking for reasons to discredit the movement in the first place. Rioting over this guy makes no sense whatsoever.
let's defend everyones right to life how about that?
Yes even them. They have loved ones, they have lives, many of them have dreams and aspirations. They matter.
Many of those gangs started as a means of protection against people who thought their lives didn't matter and they ended up where they are today. So maybe if people acted right from the start and knew the value of a life, you wouldn't be sitting here talking that dumb ****.
Gangbangers should re-think their choice in life if they truly love their families, don't you think? No only are they in danger of getting killed by a police officer if they make a wrong move...a RIVAL gang member might get him too.
Yes, the early gangs used to be important in protecting citizens from racist police/lynch mobs....but these current gangs don't protect ANYONE anymore. They only antagonize and terrorize the neighborhoods they're SUPPOSED to help. Talking about " dumb **** " . The irony
whats a reach?
no the logical conclusion is that its not up to you or a cop to decide who is "right or wrong" and prejudiciously taking life
its not your place to judge like its not the police place to be executioner
let's defend everyones right to life how about that?
how about police not making snap judgements on people and the value of their life?
i dont agree with willful imprisonment as a means of protest
Nothing you said changes that their lives do matter