Originally Posted by
SuperAntigen
Classy Freshman wrote:
Assuming what son says is the truth... how is this "real talk"?????
Dude smashed. He said his crew smashed. He provided the girls name, the friends name in the picture, the city she's from, school, phone number, etc. Thats enough if you ask me. The other cat came back with nothing.
If I smashed a girl and she didn't tell me she had a man... uhhh I still smashed soooo... I still win. How does he come out being played? If he and his crew really smashed I'm sure he didn't purchase anything so stop making stupid assumptions.
He told the kid he smashed. That's all thats needed as far as "exposure" goes. He doesn't need to expose himself to prove a point to niketalk. He didn't have to say anything. He could have threw up a few smiley faces and kept it moving.
1. Real dumb logic. So if i told you that, a few years ago, me and my boys ran a train on some chick named Jennifer Lopez, who lived a few blocks from me in an area known as Castle Hill, Bx, when I lived in Parkchester, while attending St. Raymond's High school for Boys--which is on the opposite side of the street from Castle Hill Middle School 127, and adjacent to PS 106, and i provided the pics of said Jennifer Lopez, and some random #, would you believe me.
Anyone who is familiar with the BX can corroborate the info i just put out, but it means nothing because, even though i really did live some blocks from Jennifer Lopez's former residence, and attended every school mentioned, which is in the very same vicinity--it proves nothing--anyone who is familiar with the that area can say the same thing...
2. The only reason why i even brought that up was to question the said "game" dude was critically acclaiming. Second, you say i'm making stupid assumptions--comon dude, i can call you out for the very same thing-- ol' "i really believe in the guy and what he says simply because he came up with a name, #, city, and school" lookin' boi. Once again, that really means nothing. I can go on facebook and and pull the same ishhh--attaining that kind of info. is really nothing man. Welcome to the internet buddy--feel free to park your rock and dinosaur over there...
3. I really don't see your logic. This guy pretty much tried to get props by claiming to have had intimate relations with another guy's significant other. But there's more--he further states that my boys had intimate relations with your "significant other"--if you're gonna assert something that harsh on the World Wide Web in an effort to embarrass somebody, please provide the necessary proof. And not that crap he listed, because as i previously pointed out--that can be acquired relatively with ease, but picture proof showing us and indeed verifying that:
(a) He had relations with dudes girl
(b) His boys had relations with dudes girl
(c) Female in question is indeed a bop, and as such, a fellow brethren needs to do better for himself
You say he had nothing to prove to Niketalk, comon that's a very imbecile statement. If he didn't, we would have simply done what i had suggested by PM dude--but he had to make it an e-scene. And yes, he could've thrown a few smiley faces and kept it moving, but he didn't--he posted popcorn gifs and whatnor--stating that he was waiting for dudes response so he could ether him...comon...he obviously aint wanna move on.
Personally, i really think that there is a high probability that the dude who posted the original pics is a fraud--but with the slight possibility that he aint frontin', Mr. "imma ether you" aint have to come at dude like that.
End rant...said all i need to say so i'm officially done with this...Alot of you have lovely gfs so lets just get back on track...
Taste the muhfcking rainbow
edit-- how the hell did I get away with a blatant curseword with the filter
