- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
Ye he had a little mo cap, but I wouldn't look into it much. Probably a suit from Stark to be in space
So if we don't see mocap on Captain America or Black widow then what
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ye he had a little mo cap, but I wouldn't look into it much. Probably a suit from Stark to be in space
I've said before I believe not just Venom but all Spidey spinoffs are gonna eventually invoke Holland's Spidey and if things get renewed leave a backdoor to MCU connections.I think you're confused about which producers have a problem with who or at least who still has problems with each other.
Besides there's a ticking time clock on the deal for Spidey's involvement in the MCU.
Sony execs, especially the new guys in charge who didn't make the deal can cut all ties or make it a must that their spinoffs exist in the MCU if that's the selling point.
This is why I'm not a fan of making these deals and am in favor of rights reverting. No dumbasses you have to deal with or the potential threat of your brand being diluted by possible lesser work.
Its also why I don't understand why you think it's a good thing if guys like Kinberg and Singer have any say what goes on in the MCU :x , just to get the F4 and what comes with them.
But think about it from a fan and an executive standpoint Zik. It's not a matter of how but WHY would you do a Venom film without Spider-Man.
I guess you forgot these are the same ppl who were considering an Aunt May solo where she was a spy or some **** and Spider-Man wssnt in it due to the time periodThats like doing an Uncle Ben solo film without Spider-Man, no one will care and everyone will question it.
This would be like saying Deadpool is too synomous with X-Force and Cabke so Cable has to be in the first movieVenom is too synonymous with Spider-Man and a huge part of his mythos.
This is exaggeration or you think creative writing is akin to learning quantum physics.As an executive you have already handicapped the film by not including Spider-Man let alone having to find a reasonable script to where you could explain his origins and not include Spider-Man.
I don't see how it still matters now. Its pretty much be guarantee the movie will do great which is why they already restarted their spin-off plans and have already started casting and we'd getting cool stuff like today. Expect the Silver Sable casting possibly before the end of the year.Everything is really predicated on the success of Homecoming I feel like.
Key thing there; input from Feige and co. These Sony guys don't want their hand held by him or anybody else. They want to make successful movies on their merits. The Spidey deal is pretty simple. Sony keeps all profit from Spidey movies set in the MCU, Spidey features/cameos in MCU movies, Feige and co. have complete creative control.to get input from Feige and Co. but I wouldn't put it past Sony to do something that stupid.
Speaking of foolishnessAll I know is that as a fan as much as I like the Hardy casting I will not watch this film if it isn't directly linked to MCU spidey.
So if we don't see mocap on Captain America or Black widow then what
So if we don't see mocap on Captain America or Black widow then what
No and what villains?Could it be possible that Sony gave up spidey in exchange to get villains to boost the mcu while bringing sonys rep back up?
Tom Hardy would be more suited for Flash Thompson instead, IMO. This might be an unpopular opinion, but it would be great under the MCU for new direction for a Thunderbolts movie post Infinity War and Defenders. MCU already has Elektra (DD), Punisher (DD), Ghost Rider (AoSHIELD) and potential Red Hulk (Ross in Civil War/Incredible Hulk) and SHIELD.