- 16,006
- 4,734
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
THE BIG SHOW
Had no clue he went there
Had no clue he went there
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Good point.I'd be more concerned about Self's offensive system than the players
Osh you got any info regarding Ennis going pro? Gotta assume he is
the founders of his aau program are his dad, and Mike George (now an NBA agent: first client: Anthony Bennett)
They are going to know exactly what his draft stock is, and IMO that means his gone.
Good point.
Good point.
[table][tr][td]Rankings Look Back: The Sweet 16[/td][/tr][tr][td] [/td][/tr][tr][td]
Julius Randle
[/td][td] [/td][td]
[table][tr][td]
By Brian Snow
National Recruiting Analyst
Posted Mar 24, 2014
[/td][td][/td][/tr][/table]
Of the 80 players left starting in the NCAA Tournament, how did they all rate coming out of high school, and where they did come from, here is an in-depth look.
[/td][/tr][tr][td] [h2]Where the players were ranked[/h2]
There are 80 starters remaining in the Sweet 16. The age old question is how much do recruiting rankings matter, well here is the breakdown of those 80 players based on their star level according to Scout.com.
Five-Star Prospects – 15
Four-Star Prospects – 27
Three-Star Prospects – 20
Two-Star Prospects – 9
Unranked Prospects – 9
So 52.5 percent of all the starters remaining in the mix were either four or five-star prospects coming out. That is a pretty high percentage considering that there are on average only about 25 five-star prospects per year and roughly only another 80 four-star prospects as related hundreds of three-star prospects, and then clearly thousands of two-star or lower prospects who either don’t get seen, or aren’t added into the database.
[h2]Which teams recruited the most talent[/h2]
Clearly the team that has the most recruited talent per Scout.com’s ratings isKentucky. The Wildcats start five, five-star prospects. All of them are freshman, and though he isn’t counted, the sixth man for the Wildcats is also a five-star prospect inAlex Poythress.
Now obviously the talent for Kentucky is young, and they have been inconsistent throughout the season, but it was obvious during the tournament just how good they can be when everything is clicking. With so much five-star talent, the Wildcats are now emerging as one of the favorites to get to Dallas and compete in the Final Four.
After Kentucky, it is Michigan State that comes in with the second most recruited talent in their starting five. The Spartans boast three five-star prospects in their starting five, and then also have a four-star prospect in Keith Appling to go with it.
What is different about Michigan State is that they have two seniors in their starting lineup, one junior, and then a five-star sophomore in Gary Harris. While Kentucky has more raw talent, Michigan State combines that raw recruited talent with added experience as well.
If there is a third school who gets into this category some would be surprised to know it is UCLA. The Bruins have one five-star in Kyle Anderson, and then their other four starters were seen as four-star prospects.
The Bruins are the only school besides Kentucky to have a starting five made up entirely of four and five-star talent. Also it is worth noting that the Bruins do not start a freshman, and do bring five-star freshman Zach LaVine off the bench.
Arizona is the only remaining school with multiple five-star prospects. Both Kaleb Tarczewski and Aaron Gordon were five-star prospects. Arizona doesn’t start a senior, but they do have a junior in Nick Johnson who was a high four-star prospect. Also the Wildcats bring a five-star in Rondae Hollis-Jefferson off the bench as their sixth man.
[h2]Who has found under the radar players[/h2]
This is actually the list that will probably surprise people. Most would assume that an 11 seed like Dayton or a 10 seed in Stanford would be clearly at the bottom of the recruiting barrel, but surprisingly it is one brand name and a school known for recruiting elite talent that also fit squarely in this mix.
Louisville actually boasts two, two-star prospects, one three-star, and two four-star prospects in their starting five. Both Russ Smith and Luke Hancock were viewed as two star prospects when they came out, and now both are mainstays in the Cardinals lineup.
Most assume that Louisville is rolling out a bunch of highly touted and heavily recruited kids, but the reality is that they aren’t. Now they do have a five-star in Terry Rozier coming off the bench, but the reality is through transfer and savvy scouting, the Cardinals have developed some under the radar kids into one of the top teams in the country.
Also there is the Baylor Bears. Shockingly the Bears have three kids who were not rated by Scout.com coming out. Kenny Cherry came from the junior college ranks and didn’t receive a ranking, and then Denver transfer Royce O’Neal and Boston Collegetransfer Brady Heslip both didn’t receive a ranking coming out.
Now the Bears do have a five-star in Isaiah Austin starting at center, but power forward and leader Cory Jefferson was only a three-star recruit exiting high school. Overall most assume that Scott Drew has loaded up on elite talent, but in terms of recruiting, that just isn’t the case.
Then there are the cases of Dayton and San Diego State. The Flyers do have one four-star prospect in Jordan Sibert who transferred from Ohio State and then a pair of two-stars in their lineup, though also two kids that Dayton starts were not given a rating.
San Diego State, which is made up almost entirely of transfers, has one four-star prospect, two three-star prospects, and then a two-star and an unranked prospect. Aztecs star Xavier Thames was only seen a three-star when he committed toWashington State.
[h2]Two-star haven?[/h2]
One of the unique things when looking at the breakdown is that some of the absolute best players left were seen as two-star prospects. The aforementioned Smith and Hancock of Louisville are prime examples, but a few others stand out as well.
Arizona point guard T.J. McConnell might be the one player the Wildcats need more than any other, and when he picked Duquesne originally he was seen as a two-star. Now McConnell is one of the best point guards in college basketball.
Also there is Akil Mitchell at Virginia and Josh Richardson at Tennessee. Richardson was the scoring star for the Volunteers in the round of 32, and Mitchell has been one of the steadiest performers for the No. 1 seeded Cavaliers.
Since only 11.25 percent of the starters left were seen as two-star prospects, it is unlikely that coaches are going to end up flocking to those kids, the reality is some have played absolutely vital roles in helping their teams get to the second weekend of the NCAA Tournament.
[h2]Where do they come from?[/h2]
Aside from how highly they were ranked, the other question often asked is where do the best players come from. Now clearly there are a lot of different ways to judge and answer that question, but these are the only 80 players still starting in college basketball, so they are the ones that will be broken down.
What makes this year’s Sweet 16 interesting is that in terms of school location it is fairly spread out. You have four West Coast schools, three from the Big Ten, three from the SEC, and others spread out across the country.
The state that leads the way with the most starters not surprisingly is the most populated state in the country, California. California is represented by 12 starters still remaining. That is clearly No. 1 for states.
After California, Texas, Michigan, and Canada have seven starters still left. Michigan isn’t that surprising since two schools from the state are left in the mix, however Texas only has one program left in Baylor. The Kentucky Wildcats however have three starters from the Lone Star State.
Next on the list is Ohio. The Buckeye State has five natives still in the mix, and only two of them play for the state’s lone representative, the University of Dayton.
Scout.com breaks the country down into five regions. They are East, South, Midwest, Midlands, and West. A breakdown of the states in each region can be found here http://recruiting.scout.com/3/bios.html
In terms of where the 80 prospects come from, one region clearly leads the way and that is the Midwest. Here is the exact breakdown.
Midwest – 24
West – 15
South – 13
East – 11
Outside the United States – 9
Midlands – 8
If there is one surprising thing about where the players come from this year is that the state of Maryland is only represented by Antonio Barton. Per capita Maryland has produced the most first round picks in the NBA Draft over the last decade, but this year the state almost got shutout of players.
Just as interesting is that the states of Indiana and Illinois produced zero teams in the entire field of 68, but each state has four natives still left starting in the tournament.
[/td][/tr][/table]
also as Canadians none of us grew up watching this college basketball stuff; caring about this stay in school student athlete hogwash.
Cory Joseph was FRINGE 1st round prospect and he went to the draft.
I think most of them view it was a means to an end.
That's why I'm optimistic/hoping Frankamp will get more run next year...but knowing Self, he's stubborn and will play Tharpe.Nah, Selfs offense is fine when its big man centric. he'll go back to his bootleg bo ryan swing offense and everything will be fine.
I would be more worried about THarpe and Mason figuring out how to play.
That's why I'm optimistic/hoping Frankamp will get more run next year...but knowing Self, he's stubborn and will play Tharpe.
In the last few games, he looked more comfortable running the point than Tharpe and Mason...small sample size, so take it FWIW, but a lot of KU people are really calling for Frankamp to run the point next year....how much worse can it get than Tharpe?Frankamp can run the point? Thought he was strictly a shooter.
Always thought bout this...like why the hell would a dude from Quebec or Toronto even care about a school in another country, if Canada had some teams in the NCAA they wouldnt eem be herealso as Canadians none of us grew up watching this college basketball stuff; caring about this stay in school student athlete hogwash.
Cory Joseph was FRINGE 1st round prospect and he went to the draft.
I think most of them view it was a means to an end.
Wiggins said he wasn't even a fan of CBB
UNC, UK, KU, Duke, UCLA, Zona. Give me winning there over IU.
Is IU even the best program to win at in the B10 anymore? OSU better too, no?
Anyone else hear about Ben Howland being the front runner for the Marquette job?
The advantage Pitino has always had is his ability to identify and develop talent. Nobody at a top tier basketball program consistently finds these guys that become impact players.
My secret wish is that Cal can figure this out and get one of these players at least every other year so we always have that glue guy that keeps us right with new guys coming in every year.
Howland is asking for big $ but I don't blame him. One of these jobs will offer up what he wants.
Anyone else hear about Ben Howland being the front runner for the Marquette job?
That's why I'm optimistic/hoping Frankamp will get more run next year...but knowing Self, he's stubborn and will play Tharpe.
terrence jones was that guy
Cal aint got time for thatterrence jones was that guy
I'm talking about someone who isn't a five star prospect. You aren't taking much of a leap anticipating a five star will contribute...lol.
Pitino can look much further down the prospect rankings and find talent that will contribute at a high level. Even if it takes a year or two.