- 23,150
- 46,787
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
Do we get to play this scenario with the other Warriors career trajectories if they didn’t get to play with Draymond?
I want to start.
No Draymond and Steph is poor man’s Dame
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Do we get to play this scenario with the other Warriors career trajectories if they didn’t get to play with Draymond?
Do we get to play this scenario with the other Warriors career trajectories if they didn’t get to play with Draymond?
People already do. Lest we forget the whole "they don't win those championships without draymond"
That's pretty much the consensus![]()
This makes no sense though. How would Draymond not instantly make any team betterThey dont. Thats what made their team so good, Dray was perfect for them.
Thats the point im saying though, Dray needs to be paired with certain players to be as effective as he was. You can put Steph on any team, instantly 10x better. You cant say the same thing about Dray.
This makes no sense though. How would Draymond not instantly make any team better![]()
Again, the exact same thing can be said about other HOFers. Such as if Cryrie is your best player, your team is going to suck.“10x better”
He only as good as whos around him. He’ll never be the best player on the team. If he is, thats bad. Really bad.![]()
Do we get to play this scenario with the other Warriors career trajectories if they didn’t get to play with Draymond?
Again, the exact same thing can be said about other HOFers. Such as if Cryrie is your best player, your team is going to suck.
Klay
Mitch Richmond
Dennis Rodman
Just keep the exact same energy for those dudes then.
Predictable.