- 23,958
- 15,706
1. Fallout 4
2. Battlefield 4
3. The Witcher 3
4. Star Wars Battlefront
5. Battlefield 1
The Old PlayStation Thread | *NEW THREAD IS UP*
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by iheartboost,
- Start date
1. Fallout 4
2. Battlefield 4
3. The Witcher 3
4. Star Wars Battlefront
5. Battlefield 1
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,804
- 23,550
Anyone play Bloodstained yet?
Ricky D
formerly centex hogg
- 19,428
- 14,205
Yes. I've played both Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night and Curse of the Moon. CotM is basically Castlevania III and RotN is Castlevania: Symphony of the Night. CotM is the better game, imo. RotN is cool but I am not a big fan of 2.5D graphics. I also thought that there were some forced unnecessary backtracking as a result of having no idea how to obtain specific items. I don't expect, nor do I want my hand to be held but there is one specific item in the game that you have to obtain in order to progress and I don't know how you're supposed to know without looking it up. My brother had the same problem. Overall I'd say CotM is a solid 8.5, RotN is a 7.
- 69,634
- 106,202
Yeah dudes wildin, must've never gamed above 60fps.
D
Deleted member 37467
Guest
You're lying if you can't tell
The difference between 30 and 60 is extremely noticeable to me, 120 isn't needed but 30 is absolutely unacceptable in 2020.
Doom Eternal @ 165 fps is ridiculous.
The difference between 30 and 60 is extremely noticeable to me, 120 isn't needed but 30 is absolutely unacceptable in 2020.
Doom Eternal @ 165 fps is ridiculous.
- 16,963
- 46,995
I didn't say I couldn't tell... I said for many games, the sacrifice you would have to take in resolution and graphics fidelity is not worth it.
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,804
- 23,550
- 69,634
- 106,202
Somewhat, you'll still be fine on a 60hz screen, especially if you never upgrade. The moment you try a 120/144hz panel though you'll notice the difference and it'll be an adjustment going back. Now you'll notice things like ghosting, tearing, skipping etc in more than just fps games. I'm not super sensitive to that stuff though so i'm fine though some people are.
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,804
- 23,550
D
Deleted member 37467
Guest
It's preference, I don't really care about 4K, I want the frames.
A lot because you can run into a bottleneck.
If your monitor has a 60hz refresh rate, the max frames you can get would be 60.
So if a game was 4K/120fps and your monitor is 1440p/60fps, you're getting bottlenecked by your monitor.
A lot of people do this crap w/ PC's where they buy a crazy system and skimp on the monitor,
- 69,634
- 106,202
Regular *** tv, but a 144hz monitor for pc gaming.
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,804
- 23,550
It's preference, I don't really care about 4K, I want the frames.
A lot because you can run into a bottleneck.
If your monitor has a 60hz refresh rate, the max frames you can get would be 60.
So, if a game was 4K/120fps and your monitor is 1440p/60fps, you're getting bottlenecked by your monitor.
A lot of people do this crap w/ PC's where they buy a crazy system and skimp on the monitor,
Fam, I'm going to need you to dumb it down or post a link that dumbs it down for a non tech savvy guy like myself.
- 30,550
- 33,882
swendro
formerly swendro88
- 13,005
- 9,391
- 87,866
- 50,387
swendro
formerly swendro88
- 13,005
- 9,391
It's so much smoother.
- 69,634
- 106,202
Possibly, but at about 3:55 gives a good view. Actually now that you mention it got a Note 20 Ultra and when you choose between 60hz/120hz it shows you the difference.Well maybe I need a new screen for my phone cuz i barely notice the difference
- 25,097
- 12,569
Smoother, clearer, less blur, less lagWell maybe I need a new screen for my phone cuz i barely notice the difference
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- 61,804
- 23,550
Plan on picking a tv a week or 2 before ps5 is out.
Just trying to figure out what to get.
Which tv brands are worth the purchase, things like that
- 25,097
- 12,569
Speaking of blur, that game was so much fun. Split/second also. Only good Arcade racing games we got this gen were onrush, wreck fest, crew 2 imo
Last edited:
- 12,456
- 9,502
Anyone picking up Tony Hawk?
- 69,634
- 106,202
Not many out yet, but keywords to look for to maximize would be 4K, HDR, 120Hz, HDMI 2.1, Freesync.
- 18,781
- 10,182
I am
- 17,519
- 8,576
Only game I currently have preordered.
Contemplating Dirt 5 and maaaaayybbe Destiny Beyond Light.
I was all the way out, but the amount of content I get for the price of a new game is unmatched (for me).
- 57,626
- 29,607
For me, it depends on the game you're playing, I guess. If it's some 3rd-person adventure game, then resolution would probably matter a bit more, as you're spending more time admiring the visuals, background, etc. 4k, 60fps. But if you're playing a racing game or an FPS, where everything is happening a lot faster and reaction times are important, then I'd much rather see 1080p, but with 120fps, for the response. When you're playing games with fast-moving backgrounds, I don't think screen rez will be as important of a factor.
And that's what Kazunori's going for.
www.gtplanet.net
And that's what Kazunori's going for.
Gran Turismo's Future: "4K Resolution is Enough", But 240fps is the Target
Kazunori Yamauchi has made some interesting comments about the future direction of Gran Turismo's graphics. The Polyphony Digital studio boss has suggested that frame rate, rather than display resolution, may be the area in which the next titles in the series look to improve. Yamauchi was partici
www.gtplanet.net
