- 14,263
- 34,490
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
I don't think the passengers had the necessary knowledge of submarine industry to ask whether the vessel was certified, or if they even knew that such certs even existed.They all accepted and paid to take the risk with knowledge homeboy from Oceangate is full of it. Split that bills equal ways then fine Oceangate into oblivion.
You'd be surprised at the **** some of these small tech business owners pull to get clients. Some of them don't hesitate to
All of this.That's the thing about scams...those that are affected don't know that the person scamming them is full of it. It's not even about intelligence, education, etc. Stockton Rush was able to say all of the right things and he had successful missions in the past such that it gave him credibility. The "Government regulations are way too strict. See what I've been able to do by not following it" card plays really with people who don't know the ins and outs of what you are doing. That's what he did here. Apparently he didn't even disclose it was an "experimental vessel" according to his former employees! It's just like the folks who don't understand investing and get swindled in ponzi schemes except in this case the crook's actions affected them.
Lots of slimy/unethical engineering firms out there.