- 4,735
- 2,403
I like how its different from the comics but wish they would keep it a little more in line.... Anyways, with all those shots going off, anyone thing that it'll bring a huge zombie horde to them?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DUCKTALES. In the Pilot that bullet went straight through her head as the gun was fired. U saw the hole formed and blood spew.Originally Posted by AEA18
On the Talking Dead they showed a behind the scenes of the episode and they talked about the barn scene and Sophie being shot.Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.
The director said that they can not shot a child point blank range just like in the Pilot episode when Rick shots the little girl you only see the gun and then you see the girl fall down you don't see both the gun and the girl being shot at the same time.
DUCKTALES. In the Pilot that bullet went straight through her head as the gun was fired. U saw the hole formed and blood spew.Originally Posted by AEA18
On the Talking Dead they showed a behind the scenes of the episode and they talked about the barn scene and Sophie being shot.Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.
The director said that they can not shot a child point blank range just like in the Pilot episode when Rick shots the little girl you only see the gun and then you see the girl fall down you don't see both the gun and the girl being shot at the same time.
Originally Posted by DMoney82
DUCKTALES. In the Pilot that bullet went straight through her head as the gun was fired. U saw the hole formed and blood spew.Originally Posted by AEA18
On the Talking Dead they showed a behind the scenes of the episode and they talked about the barn scene and Sophie being shot.Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.
The director said that they can not shot a child point blank range just like in the Pilot episode when Rick shots the little girl you only see the gun and then you see the girl fall down you don't see both the gun and the girl being shot at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...7S3Q&feature=related
Originally Posted by DMoney82
DUCKTALES. In the Pilot that bullet went straight through her head as the gun was fired. U saw the hole formed and blood spew.Originally Posted by AEA18
On the Talking Dead they showed a behind the scenes of the episode and they talked about the barn scene and Sophie being shot.Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.
The director said that they can not shot a child point blank range just like in the Pilot episode when Rick shots the little girl you only see the gun and then you see the girl fall down you don't see both the gun and the girl being shot at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...7S3Q&feature=related
There was no guarantee that Hershel would have let them stay in the first place, with guns or no guns. He let Lori and Rick know that he expects them to move on soon since Carl is back on his feet. Even though Rick says he's "negotiating" it was pretty evident that Hershel made his point clear. So Dale hiding the weapons does not make much sense.Originally Posted by AusZero
But if he keeps them then Herschel kicks them out. I think they're in far more jeopardy wandering than at Herschel's, Maggie even confirmed that in the episode talking about other farms being burned or full or walkers. Its the lesser of two evils and the smarter choice.Originally Posted by chris82790
I understand he's worried about Shane being a ticking bomb but by hiding those weapons he's putting the entire camp in jeopardy.Originally Posted by AusZero
Dale took the guns cause he knew Shane was a loose canon and that Herschel said they couldn't not have guns on his property. I feel like Dale and Rick both have the best interest of the group in mind so I can't fault him for hiding the guns from Shane. I wish he would have shot Shane to be honest. Rick more concerned with his family, than the rest of the group but never the less he takes everyone into account. Shane is more interested in himself and the idea of a family with Rick and Lori. That's not going to happen and it will drive him further away from rational thought.
As for if Herschel knew, Robert Kirkman the creator of the series, said after the show that Otis captured the walkers and put them in the barn. He was killed while trying to deal with the Carl situation so Sophia was never mentioned and thus Herschel never knew anything.
There was no guarantee that Hershel would have let them stay in the first place, with guns or no guns. He let Lori and Rick know that he expects them to move on soon since Carl is back on his feet. Even though Rick says he's "negotiating" it was pretty evident that Hershel made his point clear. So Dale hiding the weapons does not make much sense.Originally Posted by AusZero
But if he keeps them then Herschel kicks them out. I think they're in far more jeopardy wandering than at Herschel's, Maggie even confirmed that in the episode talking about other farms being burned or full or walkers. Its the lesser of two evils and the smarter choice.Originally Posted by chris82790
I understand he's worried about Shane being a ticking bomb but by hiding those weapons he's putting the entire camp in jeopardy.Originally Posted by AusZero
Dale took the guns cause he knew Shane was a loose canon and that Herschel said they couldn't not have guns on his property. I feel like Dale and Rick both have the best interest of the group in mind so I can't fault him for hiding the guns from Shane. I wish he would have shot Shane to be honest. Rick more concerned with his family, than the rest of the group but never the less he takes everyone into account. Shane is more interested in himself and the idea of a family with Rick and Lori. That's not going to happen and it will drive him further away from rational thought.
As for if Herschel knew, Robert Kirkman the creator of the series, said after the show that Otis captured the walkers and put them in the barn. He was killed while trying to deal with the Carl situation so Sophia was never mentioned and thus Herschel never knew anything.
You must not have read correctly. They didn't say you can't shoot a girl. They meant you can't shoot the shot(camera) from close up and have it show the trigger being pulled and the bullet entering a little girl's head all in the same shot(camera) without any cuts/different angles.Originally Posted by DMoney82
DUCKTALES. In the Pilot that bullet went straight through her head as the gun was fired. U saw the hole formed and blood spew.Originally Posted by AEA18
On the Talking Dead they showed a behind the scenes of the episode and they talked about the barn scene and Sophie being shot.Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.
The director said that they can not shot a child point blank range just like in the Pilot episode when Rick shots the little girl you only see the gun and then you see the girl fall down you don't see both the gun and the girl being shot at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...7S3Q&feature=related
You must not have read correctly. They didn't say you can't shoot a girl. They meant you can't shoot the shot(camera) from close up and have it show the trigger being pulled and the bullet entering a little girl's head all in the same shot(camera) without any cuts/different angles.Originally Posted by DMoney82
DUCKTALES. In the Pilot that bullet went straight through her head as the gun was fired. U saw the hole formed and blood spew.Originally Posted by AEA18
On the Talking Dead they showed a behind the scenes of the episode and they talked about the barn scene and Sophie being shot.Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.
The director said that they can not shot a child point blank range just like in the Pilot episode when Rick shots the little girl you only see the gun and then you see the girl fall down you don't see both the gun and the girl being shot at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/wa...7S3Q&feature=related
The only guarantee he had was that Herschel was going to kick them out if they had guns. Everything else was speculation. He was also fairly confident that Shane was going to do something stupid. I realize they were "at risk" with the walkers in the barn but Herschel and his family had made it that long without incident and were fairly secure there. Dale is going off the little concrete info he has and then his intuition about Shane, which we know is spot on.Originally Posted by chris82790
There was no guarantee that Hershel would have let them stay in the first place, with guns or no guns. He let Lori and Rick know that he expects them to move on soon since Carl is back on his feet. Even though Rick says he's "negotiating" it was pretty evident that Hershel made his point clear. So Dale hiding the weapons does not make much sense.Originally Posted by AusZero
But if he keeps them then Herschel kicks them out. I think they're in far more jeopardy wandering than at Herschel's, Maggie even confirmed that in the episode talking about other farms being burned or full or walkers. Its the lesser of two evils and the smarter choice.Originally Posted by chris82790
I understand he's worried about Shane being a ticking bomb but by hiding those weapons he's putting the entire camp in jeopardy.
The only guarantee he had was that Herschel was going to kick them out if they had guns. Everything else was speculation. He was also fairly confident that Shane was going to do something stupid. I realize they were "at risk" with the walkers in the barn but Herschel and his family had made it that long without incident and were fairly secure there. Dale is going off the little concrete info he has and then his intuition about Shane, which we know is spot on.Originally Posted by chris82790
There was no guarantee that Hershel would have let them stay in the first place, with guns or no guns. He let Lori and Rick know that he expects them to move on soon since Carl is back on his feet. Even though Rick says he's "negotiating" it was pretty evident that Hershel made his point clear. So Dale hiding the weapons does not make much sense.Originally Posted by AusZero
But if he keeps them then Herschel kicks them out. I think they're in far more jeopardy wandering than at Herschel's, Maggie even confirmed that in the episode talking about other farms being burned or full or walkers. Its the lesser of two evils and the smarter choice.Originally Posted by chris82790
I understand he's worried about Shane being a ticking bomb but by hiding those weapons he's putting the entire camp in jeopardy.
Originally Posted by RKO2004
Originally Posted by o fenomeno
i thought sophias death was a perfect example of how much weaker season 2 is. that scene would have been much better in season 1. all that mad men money wouldve been spent on making her head explode and be really gruesome and intense yet artistic and beautiful. rick shot her with his magnum for gods sake, all we get is a little spray of blood from a distant view point? come on mane.
excuse me for expecting sophias brains to spray all over the barn.You remind of this dude I was cool with. Talking about he wanted to makes a movie and in the movie, a baby gets shot with a shotgun.
*The Rocks voice* Sick freak!