highman
Banned
- 874
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
sometimes…Originally Posted by Kramer
When has anyone ever written a book that wasn't intended to be readOriginally Posted by Dame Theory
Is there really a difference? Its all semantics. You're trying to be P.C.Originally Posted by Kramer
Delusional? Not exactly. Wrong? I suppose so.Originally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by Kramer
Im not saying I understand the Bible perfectly, no one does. But God didn't "write" it, other people did, hence the 3rd person. It's believed that God inspired them to write such things thoughOriginally Posted by AntonLaVey
Originally Posted by Hazeleyed Honey
Ooo, one of my fave topics.
This is what I do not get, it is known and proven that these religious books were man made. Ok, no proof of God's existence or known facts how this universe was created, but I can ASSURE you these religious textbooks are fictitious and no different than Aesop's fables. Discovering and researching the history of it all is what made me Agnostic.
"And God said let there be light"
God did not write the bible, who writes about themselves in the third person.
Hmm were the Hindu religious texts inspired by God as well, or are people who write about God (in the case of the Hindus GODS) in other religions delusional.
I don't really want to argue though, I can see why you would think that about the people who wrote the Bible as well.
I personally wish the Bible was a lot more clear and not so up for interpretation so these questions could be answered better
Say it like it is. Hindus are wrong. Christians are right. Woe...
Maybe because it wasn't intended to be read so intensely?...or at all? Then again how would it reinforce itself if people couldn't pull other meaning from the text?How about mentioning that this version of the bible isn't even the original one...maybe the translation is wrong?And when people translate the Bible they do it from the original text, just a heads up