- 3,179
- 109
Rashi please stop posting. 1,000,000 Iraqis murdered in cold blood? GTFOHWTBS
Close all US military bases? GTFOHWTBS it's not 1860
Seriously some of this ignorance in here is astounding
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Changing stances to help current arguments ftwOriginally Posted by SunDOOBIE
And yes I am ok with the liberation of Iraq... why? Here's a few pictures why...
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
This thread is about Libyans and you want to talk about Iraq? Way to go OFF TOPIC.Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
Your posts are very amusing... and even though I enjoy snickering your typical and usual anti-American rants... give it a rest ok?
[font=arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif]
[/font]
[font='trebuchet ms', arial, verdana][/font]
[font='trebuchet ms', arial, verdana][/font]
Yet, you can't dispute what I'm saying. Instead you post a picture.
So I guess you are ok with the "liberation" of the Iraqis even though close to 1,000,000 civilians were murdered in cold blood? Or how about all the innocent children in Afghanistan?
Are youwith this?
Nothing like an all out war to "protect" civilians from bombs are dropping ontheir homes.
And yes I am ok with the liberation of Iraq... why? Here's a few pictures why...
Oh but lets not talk about the GOOD news lets concentrate on the bad things like...
"1,000,000 Civilians killed in Cold Blood"
What about the kids that Sadamm gassed?
Are youwith this?
|
[h1]'655,000 Iraqis killed since invasion'[/h1]
- Sarah Boseley, health editor
- The Guardian, Wednesday 11 October 2006 16.14 BST
- Article history
The aftermath of a Baghdad bomb attack - a study published in the Lancet estimates that 655,000 Iraqis have died as a result of the war. Photograph: Getty Images
The death toll among Iraqis as a result of the US-led invasion has now reached an estimated 655,000, a study in the Lancet medical journal reports today.
The figure for the number of deaths attributable to the conflict - which amounts to around 2.5% of the population - is at odds with figures cited by the US and UK governments and will cause a storm, but the Lancet says the work, from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, has been examined and validated by four separate independent experts who all urged publication.
In October 2004, the same researchers published a study estimating that 100,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the war since the beginning of the March 2003 invasion, a figure that was hugely controversial. Their new study, they say, reaffirms the accuracy of their survey of two years ago and moves it on.
"Although such death rates might be common in times of war, the combination of a long duration and tens of millions of people affected has made this the deadliest international conflict of the 21st century and should be of grave concern to everyone," write the authors, Gilbert Burnham and colleagues.
"At the conclusion of our 2004 study we urged that an independent body assess the excess mortality that we saw in Iraq. This has not happened. We continue to believe that an independent international body to monitor compliance with the Geneva conventions and other humanitarian standards in conflict is urgently needed. With reliable data, those voices that speak out for civilians trapped in conflict might be able to lessen the tragic human cost of future wars."
The epidemiological research was carried out on the ground by teams of doctors moving from house to house, questioning families and examining death certificates. Between May and July this year, they visited 1,849 households in 47 separated clusters across the length and breadth of Iraq. The doctors asked about deaths among members of the household in a period before the invasion, from January 2002 to March 2003, and about deaths since. In 92% of cases, they were shown death certificates confirming the cause.
A total of 629 deaths were reported, of which 547 - or 87% - occurred after the invasion. The mortality rate before the war was 5.5 per 1,000, but since the invasion, it has risen to 13.3 per 1,000 per year, they say. Between June 2005 and June 2006, the mortality rate hit a high of 19.8 per 1,000.
Thus they calculate that 654,965 Iraqis have died as a consequence of the invasion. It is an estimate and the mid-point, and most likely of a range of numbers that could also be correct in the context of their statistical analysis. But even the lowest number in the range - 392,979 - is higher that anyone else has suggested. Of the deaths, 31% were ascribed to the US-led forces. Most deaths were from gunshot wounds (56%), with a further 13% from car bomb injuries and 14% the result of other explosions.
"Since 2004, and especially recently," writes the Lancet editor, Richard Horton in a commentary, "independent observers have recognised that the security situation in Iraq has deteriorated dramatically." The new study, he continues, "corroborate the impression that Iraq is descending into bloodthirsty chaos".
Yet, he writes, "absolute despair would be the wrong response. Instead, the disaster that is the west's current strategy in Iraq must be used as a constructive call to the international community to reconfigure its foreign policy around human security rather than national security, around health and wellbeing in addition to the protection of territorial boundaries and economic stability.
"Health is now the most important foreign policy issue of our time. Health and wellbeing - their underpinning values, their diverse array of interventions and their goals of healing - offer several original dimensions for a renewed foreign policy that might at least be one positive legacy of our misadventure in Iraq."
That's just in 3 years.
SunDOOBIE wrote on 8/7/2009:
102 US Soldiers killed since Obama become President is a FACT
Hundreds if not thousands of innocent victims continue to be killed in Afghanistan/Iraq due to Obama's policy of continuing Bush's wars inIraq/Afghanistan is a FACT
Funding of billions of US dollars continue in Iraq is a FACT( "We're spending $10 billion dollars a month in Iraq, at a time when the Iraqis have a$79 billion dollar surplus" Obama 10/7/0
Torture continues at Bagram Air Force Base is a FACT
9.4% jobless rate in July is a FACT
Spending billions of US treasury while the US Govt continues to borrow money and currently is in a deficit of 1.3 Trillion dollars is a FACT
Throwing out the Racism card every time someone criticizes Obama is an EXCUSE.
SunDOOBIE = Certified
Why not just requote my post?Originally Posted by ShaunHillFTW49
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
And yes I am ok with the liberation of Iraq... why? Here's a few pictures why...
http://niketalk.yuku.com/...39-Picture#reply-6558853
The criticism of Bush will draw back to facts.
But the as of now the criticism of Obama is based from assumptions, racism, and misunderstanding.
Just because I am a disgruntled citizen that hates how the US continues to pour billions to Iraq/Afghanistan after the election of President Obama doesn't mean I am going to ignore the good what the US has done for Afghanistan/Iraq. Ever since 2001, I have openly criticized the US military occupation and waste the US govt has spent. Millions displaced. Dead Iraqis. Dead US Soldiers. on and on and on. Hell I am betting a good % of the 3,000+ posts I have made on NT since 2005 was to bash Bush and the foreign policy of the US.Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
Why not just requote my post?Originally Posted by ShaunHillFTW49
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
And yes I am ok with the liberation of Iraq... why? Here's a few pictures why...
http://niketalk.yuku.com/...39-Picture#reply-6558853
SunDOOBIE wrote on
08/07/09 1:16 PM:
The criticism of Bush will draw back to facts.
But the as of now the criticism of Obama is based from assumptions, racism, and misunderstanding.
You're done.
3 | 575 | 1052 | 1455 | 2850 | 755 | 276 | 260 | 387 |
2 | 607 | 1207 | 1459 | 2554 | 1016 | 343 | 297 | 250 |
3977 | 957 | 799 | 1801 | 2628 | 1547 | 416 | 334 | |
3437 | 1290 | 1033 | 1603 | 2457 | 1266 | 486 | 380 | |
544 | 620 | 1248 | 2117 | 2769 | 767 | 327 | 377 | |
594 | 842 | 1225 | 2447 | 2116 | 678 | 491 | 368 | |
648 | 791 | 1465 | 3182 | 2589 | 593 | 394 | 430 | |
792 | 827 | 2195 | 2759 | 2359 | 596 | 585 | 517 | |
556 | 943 | 1335 | 2423 | 1246 | 536 | 300 | 252 | |
515 | 946 | 1210 | 2932 | 1196 | 522 | 404 | 311 | |
483 | 1536 | 1320 | 2997 | 1065 | 476 | 205 | 302 | |
529 | 918 | 1003 | 2722 | 917 | 522 | 454 | 217 | |
12,080 | 10,852 | 15,092 | 27,897 | 24,746 | 9,274 | 4,681 | 4,045 | 637 |
3. Hundreds of Thousands of Iraqi Dead
The ones who have suffered the most from the Iraq “cakewalk,
Originally Posted by rashi
Stop it, dude.
3. Hundreds of Thousands of Iraqi Dead
The ones who have suffered the most from the Iraq “cakewalk,
You should be the last one to be talking about bitter people. Every single post I have read from you shows your bitterness and hate.Originally Posted by rashi
Author sounds like a bitter soul, just how our Corporate Media hates Wikileaks. They got the info first and exploited it.
Originally Posted by WE GET MONEY
1,000,000just stop posting Rashi
Originally Posted by kbweezy24
I think that most people don't realize the shady %#%! that goes on in other countries- all so we can enjoy the comforts offered by the US
how can we support wars, the killing of innocent civilians and blatant hypocrisy just to enjoy sub-$3 gas?
if you think that the US doesn't have a personal agenda in each of our foreign actions, you reek of ignorance.
Eventually we end up having to defend ourselves from groups that have been victims of our past transgressions. But when it comes back around, the American public is outraged by the "audacity" a specific group displays acting out against the US. (not to say terrorist actions are in any way justified- only that we shouldn't be completely surprised when something happens)
*also, the US is very scared of China, as they will most likely replace us as the worlds "superpower" in the coming decades. I wouldn't be surprised if limiting China's access to resources like oil is part of the US's foreign agenda.
btw, a good read:
Blowback, by Chalmers Johnson
http://www.amazon.com/Blo...can-Empire/dp/0805075593
After that first line it was hard to even take your post seriously.Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
I swear to God I'm so out of the loop that I don't even know what the hell is going on. I barely watch the news, and when I do it's always some war propaganda with another Arab or Muslim country. This *!%+ is sickening man. For 10 years straight, millions of innocent Arab and Muslim lives have been lost for money, power, greed. Am I the only one who sits back and analyzes this realizing there's something greater happening that we don't know? Are some of us that dumb?
America wants to act like the mediator of this situation to protect innocent lives from be taken, but when Israel bombarded the Gaza Strip in 2008 and killed 1,500 innocent lives- no one said a damn thing.
It's sickening. It's exactly I will never vote in this country. I probably will never bear the American flag proudly in my lifetime, and it's because of reasons like this. Matter of fact, the next time I attend a sporting event, I'll probably turn my back when the sing the national anthem. I'm not supporting this *!%+, and that will be my way of showing it.
And if some of you don't like it, oh well. Sue me.
Originally Posted by an dee 51o
Dear Animal Thug and rashi,
Please stop posting. Forever.
Sincerely,
NT
rashi wrote:
People don't sign up to defend ANOTHER country.
very likely. but they know full well the possibilities, especially in a post 9/11 climate.
i didn't sign up for a torn ACL playing football, but i knew it was possible. i didn't sign up to get beaned when I played baseball, but i was very aware that it could happen.
your statement = invalid.
alright, Chris Jackson. don't "probably", man up and do it or don't try to get yourself over as a heel, you rebel, you.Originally Posted by Animal Thug1539
I swear to God I'm so out of the loop that I don't even know what the hell is going on. I barely watch the news, and when I do it's always some war propaganda with another Arab or Muslim country. This *!%+ is sickening man. For 10 years straight, millions of innocent Arab and Muslim lives have been lost for money, power, greed. Am I the only one who sits back and analyzes this realizing there's something greater happening that we don't know? Are some of us that dumb?
America wants to act like the mediator of this situation to protect innocent lives from be taken, but when Israel bombarded the Gaza Strip in 2008 and killed 1,500 innocent lives- no one said a damn thing.
It's sickening. It's exactly I will never vote in this country. I probably will never bear the American flag proudly in my lifetime, and it's because of reasons like this. Matter of fact, the next time I attend a sporting event, I'll probably turn my back when the sing the national anthem. I'm not supporting this *!%+, and that will be my way of showing it.
And if some of you don't like it, oh well. Sue me.