shatterkneesinc
Banned
- 22,524
- 2,383
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
all that power
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Joe Billionaire
still 1 gig of ram smh
if i had a phone that currently dual core with 1gb ram i wouldnt upgrade or cop any phone yet
Originally Posted by Joe Billionaire
still 1 gig of ram smh
if i had a phone that currently dual core with 1gb ram i wouldnt upgrade or cop any phone yet
neither is 4 cores tho, its all to spec stunt anywayOriginally Posted by Alchemist IQ
Originally Posted by Joe Billionaire
still 1 gig of ram smh
if i had a phone that currently dual core with 1gb ram i wouldnt upgrade or cop any phone yet
I rather have fantastic battery life than 2 gig of ram. 2 gig of ram is not needed in smartphone right now. Manufactures need to work on battery longevity.
neither is 4 cores tho, its all to spec stunt anywayOriginally Posted by Alchemist IQ
Originally Posted by Joe Billionaire
still 1 gig of ram smh
if i had a phone that currently dual core with 1gb ram i wouldnt upgrade or cop any phone yet
I rather have fantastic battery life than 2 gig of ram. 2 gig of ram is not needed in smartphone right now. Manufactures need to work on battery longevity.
[h1]Samsung Galaxy S III Specs Completely Exposed by Benchmark?[/h1]
File under: News
By: Anton D. Nagy | 4:00 AM 26-Apr-12 | 0 Comments
We know that the Next Galaxy flagship phone from Samsung -- probably called the Galaxy S III -- will sport a quad-core Exynos 4 Quad processor clocking at 1.4GHz. There were some rumors regarding the other specs but it looks like the AnTuTu benchmark database contains all the details needed.
The CPU is spot on: Exynos clocking at 1.4GHz, just as announced by Samsung earlier (but different than previously reported benchmarks). The display is listed as being one of 4.7 inches with 720x1280 720p resolution but interestingly, opposed to some rumors, there appears to be not two but 1GB of RAM (which should be enough for most, but is it 12 month future proof?). The camera on the other hand, as it appears in the database, is one of twelve-megapixels and the front-facer is a two-megapixel one.
That's pretty much it, plus Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich with (most probably) Samsung's own TouchWiz UI on top of it. The only variable now is related to the actual outer aspect of the phone. Looks might or might not matter much to you but the horsepower is important (not to mention that this device seems to top the benchmark list). What do you think?
If this is true, it's for sure going to be 3 bills. But with those specs? Well worth it, at least for some.
[h1]Samsung Galaxy S III Specs Completely Exposed by Benchmark?[/h1]
File under: News
By: Anton D. Nagy | 4:00 AM 26-Apr-12 | 0 Comments
We know that the Next Galaxy flagship phone from Samsung -- probably called the Galaxy S III -- will sport a quad-core Exynos 4 Quad processor clocking at 1.4GHz. There were some rumors regarding the other specs but it looks like the AnTuTu benchmark database contains all the details needed.
The CPU is spot on: Exynos clocking at 1.4GHz, just as announced by Samsung earlier (but different than previously reported benchmarks). The display is listed as being one of 4.7 inches with 720x1280 720p resolution but interestingly, opposed to some rumors, there appears to be not two but 1GB of RAM (which should be enough for most, but is it 12 month future proof?). The camera on the other hand, as it appears in the database, is one of twelve-megapixels and the front-facer is a two-megapixel one.
That's pretty much it, plus Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich with (most probably) Samsung's own TouchWiz UI on top of it. The only variable now is related to the actual outer aspect of the phone. Looks might or might not matter much to you but the horsepower is important (not to mention that this device seems to top the benchmark list). What do you think?
If this is true, it's for sure going to be 3 bills. But with those specs? Well worth it, at least for some.