- 263
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2012
It's been a long time since I've been posed with a discussion I feel doesn't have any invitation for contrarian positioning. A friend of mines (lives in Hollywood) was recently dumped by her 3 year boyfriend who recently became junior partner at Malibu reality firm. When asked why she was dumped his response was:
"I feel I can't trust you, you didn't want me I was broke. In fact you ignored me on a few occasion before we even dated. What changed?"
She's looking for a shoulder to cry on, and for the first time I avoided the discussion because I secretly felt his pain. I have a few buddies who are up and coming and women here in New York tend to brush them off because of their current status. In women's defense, where should she draw the line? Should she want a broke companion? A guy who is "getting his +*$# together?" Can you blame her for not taking a broke guy too serious?
"I feel I can't trust you, you didn't want me I was broke. In fact you ignored me on a few occasion before we even dated. What changed?"
She's looking for a shoulder to cry on, and for the first time I avoided the discussion because I secretly felt his pain. I have a few buddies who are up and coming and women here in New York tend to brush them off because of their current status. In women's defense, where should she draw the line? Should she want a broke companion? A guy who is "getting his +*$# together?" Can you blame her for not taking a broke guy too serious?