- 2,411
- 826
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
You can count me in
.... if true
White Cement IV Rumored to Return Summer 2011
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by kojomesa,
- Start date
- 13,326
- 11,538
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
I hope its true, two pair minimum on those.
- 13,326
- 11,538
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
I hope its true, two pair minimum on those.
- 888
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
Not doubting you GG. but that pic is horrible. The shade of grey is horrible. The jumpman is horrible. I wanna see better pics. But I don't think it'll look right with the jumpman. So FOR NOW, I'm good with my NIKE AIR'S
- 888
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
Not doubting you GG. but that pic is horrible. The shade of grey is horrible. The jumpman is horrible. I wanna see better pics. But I don't think it'll look right with the jumpman. So FOR NOW, I'm good with my NIKE AIR'S
- 401
- 33
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
They coming out. Remember the fusion powder 9's came out and a year later the real Air jordan Powder 9s came out. I have hope for these releasing next year.
- 401
- 33
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
They coming out. Remember the fusion powder 9's came out and a year later the real Air jordan Powder 9s came out. I have hope for these releasing next year.
- 856
- 34
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2010
AGREED! I have a 99 pair, but they aren't really wearable, so fragile
- 856
- 34
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2010
AGREED! I have a 99 pair, but they aren't really wearable, so fragile
- 2,925
- 10
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
we'll see how this turns out
- 2,925
- 10
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
we'll see how this turns out
- 101
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
Okay. I might get roasted for this question. But out of curiousity. Whats wrong with a jumpman on the back?
- 101
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
Okay. I might get roasted for this question. But out of curiousity. Whats wrong with a jumpman on the back?
- 1,376
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2009
Don't assume these coming are releasing. It's a rumor until confirmed.
Chicago X's for example
Chicago X's for example
- 1,376
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2009
Don't assume these coming are releasing. It's a rumor until confirmed.
Chicago X's for example
Chicago X's for example
- 912
- 730
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
Attention ! Jordan Brand representatives or members if you read this message this is the 1 shoe and colorway that the shoe will not, I repeat will not be right without Nike Air. Even the fakes have it right. I know you guys need some sales with these recent releases. So Put the Nike where it rightfully belongs and you will have an %!$ load of money coming in.
- 912
- 730
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
Attention ! Jordan Brand representatives or members if you read this message this is the 1 shoe and colorway that the shoe will not, I repeat will not be right without Nike Air. Even the fakes have it right. I know you guys need some sales with these recent releases. So Put the Nike where it rightfully belongs and you will have an %!$ load of money coming in.
- 888
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
Nothing, if that's how you feel. Me personally, and most sneakerheads, prefer the originality of a shoe. Most of us prefer it to be left alone how it was originally done. As in case, NIKE AIR or possible pass. The shoe is too iconic to possess a jumpman. I've had three pairs of those since the 99 release and would rather have it that way. But if/when they do drop, most likely I'll cop 1 so I can finally retire the one I'm rocking today.
- 888
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
Nothing, if that's how you feel. Me personally, and most sneakerheads, prefer the originality of a shoe. Most of us prefer it to be left alone how it was originally done. As in case, NIKE AIR or possible pass. The shoe is too iconic to possess a jumpman. I've had three pairs of those since the 99 release and would rather have it that way. But if/when they do drop, most likely I'll cop 1 so I can finally retire the one I'm rocking today.
- 9,189
- 1,135
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
IV's are one of the most disappointing Jordans in the entire lineup IMO. They give you an awful shape, piss-poor quality, and no Nike Air to complete the look....
...newer retro IV's are trash...word to the Mili IV's...
...newer retro IV's are trash...word to the Mili IV's...
- 9,189
- 1,135
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
IV's are one of the most disappointing Jordans in the entire lineup IMO. They give you an awful shape, piss-poor quality, and no Nike Air to complete the look....
...newer retro IV's are trash...word to the Mili IV's...
...newer retro IV's are trash...word to the Mili IV's...
kojomesa
Banned
- 1,064
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
Agreed.
kojomesa
Banned
- 1,064
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
Agreed.
SlamShut
formerly cement greyman
- 5,127
- 6,794
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2005
Originally Posted by AirUpHere23
IV's are one of the most disappointing Jordans in the entire lineup IMO. They give you an awful shape, piss-poor quality, and no Nike Air to complete the look....
...newer retro IV's are trash...word to the Mili IV's...
This. Throwing NIKE on the back can't even save the IV at this point. They will still have that cheap looking LA Gear netting, weird shape and the wrong materials.
SlamShut
formerly cement greyman
- 5,127
- 6,794
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2005
Originally Posted by AirUpHere23
IV's are one of the most disappointing Jordans in the entire lineup IMO. They give you an awful shape, piss-poor quality, and no Nike Air to complete the look....
...newer retro IV's are trash...word to the Mili IV's...
This. Throwing NIKE on the back can't even save the IV at this point. They will still have that cheap looking LA Gear netting, weird shape and the wrong materials.
Similar threads
