- 6,227
- 238
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2006
Op is a herb
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Then why bother responding?Originally Posted by abovelegit1
-They're both terrible, but I think Curry is slightly less terrible. Mainly because he's more a point guard, and thus matches up better size-wise with the respective position.Originally Posted by amel223
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Oh, and amel, I'm glad you were able to pull yourself away from your D-Rose shrine to dismiss me. Good for you.
"Stephen Curry is a better defender than Monta Ellis"
"Lebron has the most explosive first step in the league"
"Chris Paul is by far the best point guard this year"
I'm sorry, but you make it hard not to.
-I said, "one of...."
-The "by far" was correct at the time, but I still think he's the better point man.
I don't care to look up the ridiculous crap you've said, but suffice to say, I couldn't care less what you think about basketball.
Then why bother responding?Originally Posted by abovelegit1
-They're both terrible, but I think Curry is slightly less terrible. Mainly because he's more a point guard, and thus matches up better size-wise with the respective position.Originally Posted by amel223
Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Oh, and amel, I'm glad you were able to pull yourself away from your D-Rose shrine to dismiss me. Good for you.
"Stephen Curry is a better defender than Monta Ellis"
"Lebron has the most explosive first step in the league"
"Chris Paul is by far the best point guard this year"
I'm sorry, but you make it hard not to.
-I said, "one of...."
-The "by far" was correct at the time, but I still think he's the better point man.
I don't care to look up the ridiculous crap you've said, but suffice to say, I couldn't care less what you think about basketball.
Originally Posted by kvsm23vs24
I man not a Lebron fan, but to hate on his game
Trak1sh wrote:
Op is a herb
Type of cat that has plenty of post but consistently goes in threads and adds nothing. Dude got the NT career of a ExtraBut I see you kid...get them post.
I'm not saying Lebron isn't a great player. I'm not even saying he can't score. What I'm saying is that truthfully when you break down his game, his scoring is undependable. He can not score like a successful go-to-guy should. If the offense is built around DWade and Lebron continues to score like he does, then it's fine. He's not the primary scorer and like many 2nd options have proved, just adding the scoring throughout the game is enough for you to be successful. Like I said, my beef is when people associate his game with the best in the world or say he has an "explosive" first step when he doesn't.
Games on today!
Originally Posted by kvsm23vs24
I man not a Lebron fan, but to hate on his game
Trak1sh wrote:
Op is a herb
Type of cat that has plenty of post but consistently goes in threads and adds nothing. Dude got the NT career of a ExtraBut I see you kid...get them post.
I'm not saying Lebron isn't a great player. I'm not even saying he can't score. What I'm saying is that truthfully when you break down his game, his scoring is undependable. He can not score like a successful go-to-guy should. If the offense is built around DWade and Lebron continues to score like he does, then it's fine. He's not the primary scorer and like many 2nd options have proved, just adding the scoring throughout the game is enough for you to be successful. Like I said, my beef is when people associate his game with the best in the world or say he has an "explosive" first step when he doesn't.
Games on today!
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Yall dudes are missing the big picture. The only thing that matters in basketball is winning. Skills, athleticism, and all that good stuff comes second at the end of the day dudes are recognized by their accomplishments not facets of their games.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Yall dudes are missing the big picture. The only thing that matters in basketball is winning. Skills, athleticism, and all that good stuff comes second at the end of the day dudes are recognized by their accomplishments not facets of their games.
Lol you comparing a legit GOAT in his position to Penny?Originally Posted by 4Shoposite
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Yall dudes are missing the big picture. The only thing that matters in basketball is winning. Skills, athleticism, and all that good stuff comes second at the end of the day dudes are recognized by their accomplishments not facets of their games.Tell that to Michael. Tell that to Kobe. Tell that to Bird. Hell, tell that to Rose.
Nobody is missing the big picture. If we have learned anything from sports and when talking about ranking players and what not...it's that winning isn't enough. It's a 1a 1c importance when talking about how good a player was. Their accomplishments are first, but majority of what makes them a "legend" is the subjective stuff.
How come Duncan has 4 rings, considered the best PF of all time in many circles...yet - a guy like Anfernee Hardaway has no rings and truthfully had a superstar career that lasted from like 95 to 98 - has probably triple the amount of personal fans Duncan has? Some of yall aint "seeing the big picture".
Lol you comparing a legit GOAT in his position to Penny?Originally Posted by 4Shoposite
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Yall dudes are missing the big picture. The only thing that matters in basketball is winning. Skills, athleticism, and all that good stuff comes second at the end of the day dudes are recognized by their accomplishments not facets of their games.Tell that to Michael. Tell that to Kobe. Tell that to Bird. Hell, tell that to Rose.
Nobody is missing the big picture. If we have learned anything from sports and when talking about ranking players and what not...it's that winning isn't enough. It's a 1a 1c importance when talking about how good a player was. Their accomplishments are first, but majority of what makes them a "legend" is the subjective stuff.
How come Duncan has 4 rings, considered the best PF of all time in many circles...yet - a guy like Anfernee Hardaway has no rings and truthfully had a superstar career that lasted from like 95 to 98 - has probably triple the amount of personal fans Duncan has? Some of yall aint "seeing the big picture".
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Lol you comparing a legit GOAT in his position to Penny?Originally Posted by 4Shoposite
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Yall dudes are missing the big picture. The only thing that matters in basketball is winning. Skills, athleticism, and all that good stuff comes second at the end of the day dudes are recognized by their accomplishments not facets of their games.Tell that to Michael. Tell that to Kobe. Tell that to Bird. Hell, tell that to Rose.
Nobody is missing the big picture. If we have learned anything from sports and when talking about ranking players and what not...it's that winning isn't enough. It's a 1a 1c importance when talking about how good a player was. Their accomplishments are first, but majority of what makes them a "legend" is the subjective stuff.
How come Duncan has 4 rings, considered the best PF of all time in many circles...yet - a guy like Anfernee Hardaway has no rings and truthfully had a superstar career that lasted from like 95 to 98 - has probably triple the amount of personal fans Duncan has? Some of yall aint "seeing the big picture".
Some of yall are really nut riding some of these 90's ball players.
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Lol you comparing a legit GOAT in his position to Penny?Originally Posted by 4Shoposite
Originally Posted by usainboltisfast
Yall dudes are missing the big picture. The only thing that matters in basketball is winning. Skills, athleticism, and all that good stuff comes second at the end of the day dudes are recognized by their accomplishments not facets of their games.Tell that to Michael. Tell that to Kobe. Tell that to Bird. Hell, tell that to Rose.
Nobody is missing the big picture. If we have learned anything from sports and when talking about ranking players and what not...it's that winning isn't enough. It's a 1a 1c importance when talking about how good a player was. Their accomplishments are first, but majority of what makes them a "legend" is the subjective stuff.
How come Duncan has 4 rings, considered the best PF of all time in many circles...yet - a guy like Anfernee Hardaway has no rings and truthfully had a superstar career that lasted from like 95 to 98 - has probably triple the amount of personal fans Duncan has? Some of yall aint "seeing the big picture".
Some of yall are really nut riding some of these 90's ball players.