- Sep 20, 2007
- 13,230
- 14,704
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i stopped gaming from 2009-2012 because I was bored of video games at that point. So the 360 gen only lasted 4-5 years for me. We already have games that are pushing the hardware. Halo 5, forza horizon 2, supposedly gears 4, and witcher 3. All those games had to make some sort of compromise to be able to work as well as they do on xb1. Cd project red isn't going to get their next game to run at 1080p/60fps because the xb1 gen lasts longer. Console game graphics have always been a few steps behind what's capable on pc. Scorpio is meant is to address that trend. I can list 20 games that aren't possible or perform bad on 360. Mad max, dragon age 3, forza horizon 2, forza motoersport 5/6, ryse to name a few. Forza horizon 3 for instance will still run at 1080p/30fps. It's been 2 years since fh2 released, maybe they already squeezed all the power out of the xb1?I dunno man
8 year lifecycle of the 360/PS3 was a godsend to consumers. Look at what they were able to produce late in the gen with games like Last of Us and GTA V
The main thing holding most games back these days is imagination and familiarity with the programming, not processing power
These days, new tech every 5 years results in such minor improvements, and is usually just an added cost to the consumer, resulting in early Gen "lipstick on a pig" ie. boring, non-innovative games with slightly upgraded graphics. Developers haven't even maximized the current machines. Takes them a couple of years to figure it out, and as soon as they do "whoops! on to the next gen"
NahThe devs now are too young to make compelling games..
If i had to guess, it's probably rising aaa dev costs.
The devs now are too young to make compelling games..
Or are you saying they're too young to develop compellingly sound games that are interesting / fun to play overall? Like gameplay and balance wise?
i wouldn't know how to answer that question i think there are a ton of great games out but "answer to everything in life" isn't something i could judge anything by b. i think nowadays games are as diverse as they have ever been tho in terms of the variety especially in the indie game marketName a game, excluding the witcher 3 which seems to be your answer to everything in life, I'll give you the last three years
i wouldn't know how to answer that question i think there are a ton of great games out but "answer to everything in life" isn't something i could judge anything by b. i think nowadays games are as diverse as they have ever been tho in terms of the variety especially in the indie game market
I see all of this but how come Kojima still beasts? And why is Miyazaki still beasting.
The dudes making games now who are young aren't good.
The landscape in which business impacts video game development is much different now then when Kojima and Miyazaki were initially making their mark.
I just said it cause it's the only game you ever bring up in here. I agree with you the witcher is amazing but I think it's an injustice to gamers when we only get about 4 games every five years that are that good. That's why I said to name another game in the past three years that was as good as it
there have been others too tho. Fallout, Arkham Knight, Bloodborne, FH2, Rocket League, and some others that are very good. i dont understand what you mean by another game being as good as Witcher 3 because its pretty vague what you mean by it and judging the quality of one game based on a different one isn't a way to critique somethingI just said it cause it's the only game you ever bring up in here. I agree with you the witcher is amazing but I think it's an injustice to gamers when we only get about 4 games every five years that are that good. That's why I said to name another game in the past three years that was as good as it
Name a game, excluding the witcher 3 which seems to be your answer to everything in life, I'll give you the last three years
Cool, but I'm not gonna accept that answer. $60 dollars of my money isn't chump change. I want quality games not a title that's been worked on and delayed and finally gets put out and needs about six updates to work properly.
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just saying we don't pay pennies for the trash they put out.
The perceived value $60 has decreased; I actually advocate for a higher base price for more content.
NES cartridges were selling for $50 in the early 90s (Approx. $92 in 2016 Dollars)
N64 games often cost as between $60 and $70 in the late 90's (Approx. $86-$101 in 2016 Dollars)
This has to do more with the buying power of the $., increased costs, static prices and the desire for increased profits year over year. People are lazy but there are definitely a lot of external factors that come into play.
I do agree with you in the sense that I wish we had a new Golden Era of gaming; if Scorpio turns out the way I envision, then we might have something.
iYen bringing out the Forza Horizon now.
RIP Don. You ain't winnin that argument.
iYen bringing out the Forza Horizon now.
RIP Don. You ain't winnin that argument.
Peeped that. It's over.
Let's go back to talking about the S and Scorpio lol