- 67,662
- 78,755
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
Going through solid screens is hard af. Some are like brick walls.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Don't see how that's unfair to say at all though
CP, Blake and DJ have great chemistry
I'm not sure how Conley/Parsons/Gasol are better fits for Blake
Not to mention JJ spreading the floor offensively
There is a big difference between Blake/CP/DJ and Parsons/Marc/Conley
Ultimately, its all perspective and from my perspective, Im not as high on marc mike and chandler as I would be say, two years ago.
Clips core 4 has been the best foursome in the league for 3 years and thats not an accident. I think there is a real gap between lac and memphis right now
If you're referring to that Tony Parker video...there was no screen set on Russ. He just completely lost Parker on the play.Goung through solid screens is hard af. Some are like brick walls.
Goung through solid screens is hard af. Some are like brick walls.
If you're referring to that Tony Parker video...there was no screen set on Russ. He just completely lost Parker on the play.
If you're an elite athlete, you can play defense, period.
If you can't, you chose not to
.....annnnnnnd this is where the topic always muddys. Read my post, and then real all of the responses to it.
Of course an elite athlete has higher potential to be an elite defender, butto say they have the outright "choice" to be an elite defenderis hilarious. As if it's a light switch
exactly.... at defense being 70 percent effort.Defense requires so many split second reads and perfect positioning - it really doesn't matter how athletic you are if you don't know what you're supposed to be doing IMMEDIATELY. Things are happening fast on the court. People keep thinking of defense as just man-to-man, 1v1 when it's way more than that. Obviously you need to be athletic enough to get to the spots though to be good.
Nike strikes again
Got all the non-Nike guys shoes hidden.
Too many non-nike/jordan guys for coach K to cover up their shoes like he did dwights in 08.Nike strikes again
Got all the non-Nike guys shoes hidden.
Not even gonna front, that Dame Lilliard song been on repeat for me at work,
Spitting dat hot fiya.
It's "mind bottling" to me that Chandler Parsons was discussed as the major key to Blake Griffin defecting to Memphis.
bhz's Grizzlies homerism shining through once again.
you talking about last season's clippers who had some kinda important injuries?Not to mention these Clippers lost to an overachieving Portland team that Memphis dominated the year before with a better roster (and with only having Conley for two games). I don't want to hear the excuse that Blake wasn't 100% healthy because if their talent was more superior to what else Memphis had on the roster, they shouldn't have ever lost to an overachieving Portland team. Fools were in a dog fight after 4 games before CP3 and Blake sat out the last two games.
A team as good as LAC should've at least been up 3-1 on them after 4 games. Memphis did it with Beno Udrih starting.
I just need explanations for this favoritism. I won't get it, tho
This is what I took, if I misunderstood your premise, my fault
This is more about effort than increased competition.
If Russ wanted to make All NBA 1st team, He could.
you talking about last season's clippers who had some kinda important injuries?
huh? Unless I am missing something here, the Warriors beat the trailblazers. And wasn't that series tied before both Blake and CP3 went down?the same clippers who had both CP3 and Blake playing in the first 4 games of the series. yes, those clippers.
why are injuries brought up so quickly to defend them, but not used when talking about memphis situation? clippers should've finished that team off in 4-5 games. memphis finished a better portland team off without their starting PG. don't bring injuries into this b
the same clippers that were top 10 in off and def efficiency last season. yes, explain to me how their injuries kept them from beating a team they were more superior than
Yes, you are missing something here. You are reading 1 post, not the entire conversation.huh? Unless I am missing something here, the Warriors beat the trailblazers. And wasn't that series tied before both Blake and CP3 went down?the same clippers who had both CP3 and Blake playing in the first 4 games of the series. yes, those clippers.
why are injuries brought up so quickly to defend them, but not used when talking about memphis situation? clippers should've finished that team off in 4-5 games. memphis finished a better portland team off without their starting PG. don't bring injuries into this b
the same clippers that were top 10 in off and def efficiency last season. yes, explain to me how their injuries kept them from beating a team they were more superior than