AGAIN? - Baltimore Man Dies From Injuries During Arrest

[frenchbreadbuilds]

Just waiting for Meth to bring more ether.

 

[airphilippines]

Can't believe some of these replies.
View media item 1557253

 

[jumpman247]

I really hope one day maybe hundreds of years from now when the aliens from outterspace come and wage war with us we will unite as one race, the human race.

 

[fontaine]

What's crazy of this thread... Highness thoughts are a minority.

Out side of NT... He's in the majority

 

[trueprada]

 The police have said that any Black person that steps off of the stoop at city hall will be arrested #Baltimore #BlueLivesMatter

The sister of #TyroneWest is here protesting

No media is allowed to talk to the #BlueLivesMatter protestors either

The police have now come to watch the Black protestors #Baltimore # 

He's been on the #BlueLivesMatter side all day 

#BlueLivesMatter protestors are taunting black protestors here in #Baltimore 

 

[AEA18]

I would ask those #Bluelivesmatter supporters how many unarmed people have killed cops?

 

[spacedoodoo]

blue lives matter.. as if they're the ones who are getting killed for no reason 

 

[Nawzlew]

Where's Rusty? Dude just ran off and didn't answer my questions. He could have at least provided a source for his points.

Many of you don't ever answer my questions, just try to target some things that are "Provable to be wrong" then insult me man.

Management, where's your response about my link of listed countries with most murder rates? Where's the European countries in that list? If you want to talk about intelligence, I mean, I haven't even started on the IQ levels (statistics), the graduation rates (statistics), etc. Which plays a factor in that too and can also belong in the culture category. I don't know much about the middle east from all the wars that's happening over there right now, so I won't mention it especially ISIS, since that's a different topic.

And how about Japan,South Korea,Taiwan,Hong Kong and Singapore? Not teary eyed one bit, just pitying some of your views which seem to be deeply rooted in ignorance.

You're just trying to fit in. You know some of those Asian countries are racist right? Miss Japan was half black, and criticized for not being Japanese enough.

There were also a lot of people that were supportive.

Again with generalizations.

 

[mr marcus]

Racially ignorant hicks

 

[mr highness]

What's crazy of this thread... Highness thoughts are a minority.

Out side of NT... He's in the majority

Time out, there are two sides of that majority, the side with reason, and the side with hate (racists). I'm the side with reason. But many of us go by statistics. These punk racist whites always perceive the black man as a thug because of shootings, murder news, "hoods", majority black populated cities such as Detroit, the killings in Africa as well as their countries status, violence in some rap music, slapping "girls", etc.

He's been on the #BlueLivesMatter side all day 

#BlueLivesMatter protestors are taunting black protestors here in #Baltimore 
 

It's funny how some people here are showing distaste, but yet there's some Black folks on that last picture, probably on the side of these BlueLivesMatter?

I would ask those #Bluelivesmatter supporters how many unarmed people have killed cops?

You should ask instead how many cops helped and saved many unarmed people.

@Nawz, people here generalizing is no different than me generalizing.

These punk cops ain't the problem, nation-wide violence is the TRUE problem. If we could all march and spread the world to end violence on humanity, we could be doing things. But nope, we just complain about racism and just let our own black brothers kill other black brothers and brown brothers kill other brown brothers. This just angers the white racist community and scares them, hence why they're so quick to pull that trigger. I'm not an evil man like you guys perceive me to me, I'm just a colored man with reason, I look at statistics before I go to any conclusion. You guys have to basically insult me half of the time on your posts, and that basically proves my point, some of you guys have to attack me online. I never disrespected anybody in this thread. I try to reason, and be professional here as I can with good composure. Yet I get called, "dense". People still don't get it.

It's the same black violence that got my favorite rappers 2Pac and Biggie killed as well as other important black figures I look up to. Look at this link: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/s/lil-wayne-tour-bus-shooting-leads-gang-charges-185926961.html Lil Wayne could have been next on that list too. And I like some of his music.

 

[AEA18]

#BlackLivesMatters Protestors Oppose O'Malley's Presidential Bid

 

[jumpman247]

I really hate the word colored.

 

[Methodical Management]

Time out, there are two sides of that majority, the side with reason, and the side with hate (racists). I'm the side with reason. But many of us go by statistics. These punk racist whites always perceive the black man as a thug because of shootings, murder news, "hoods", majority black populated cities such as Detroit, the killings in Africa as well as their countries status, violence in some rap music, slapping "girls", etc.

You're only fooling yourself on that one.  The "racist whites [who] always perceive the black man as a thug because of shootings, murder news, "hoods", majority black populated cities such as Detroit, the killings in Africa as well as their countries status, violence in some rap music, slapping "girls", etc." could cite "statistics" in the same way you do (vaguely, selectively, and inaccurately) to make the same basic point: "White people are superior."  

The two different camps are the old school racists who believe in biological inferiority and the neoliberal racists who believe in cultural inferiority.  Favoring the latter hardly qualifies as siding with "reason." 

In the end, you've been pretty blatant and overt in asserting White supremacist ideology - trotting out all the old racist canards in the process.  (Violence/criminality, intelligence, work ethic...)  The process through which you've attempted to support these vulgar, antiquated stereotypes is hardly scientific.

You start with the judgment/conclusion first and then engage in lazy ex post facto hypothesizing to try and reverse engineer an argument that could support your preconceived notions about people of color.  

You claim to go by statistics, but, as we've seen, you've failed to articulate any specific definition for "good values," let alone demonstrated that White people, globally, all share the same "good values."  As I've explained, when you get into the business of inferring values from results, then positing those values as the cause of said results, you're engaging in circular reasoning.  

This flawed line of thinking is nothing more than a Social Darwinist tautology, which defines fitness by outcome.  Who’s fit?  Someone who succeeds economically.  Who’s unfit?  Someone who fails to succeed economically.  Such reasoning doesn't define "fitness" independent of results, it simply describes and justifies those results.  

The minute you've been asked to supply us with some sort of testable hypothesis, everything falls to pieces.  

I find it particularly ironic that, in the process of attempting to defend White Americans against stereotyping, you've attempted to claim that White people globally all share the same "superior" culture.  As "proof", you've tried to cherry pick the case of Germany as an example of a country purportedly pulling itself up by the bootstraps - like "if they can rebuild after World War II, certainly African nations should have no problem recovering from the imperialism."  Such a comparison is impossibly simplistic and woefully ignorant.  

You're foisting European nations - which you're crudely and transparently attempting to present as a proxy for "White nations" -  as the pinnacle of civilization... based on what, exactly?  Their own unique technological innovations?  How many of those would be possible without written language?  Without agriculture?  You do realize that all human beings can trace their roots back to sub-Saharan Africa, correct?  European civilizations did not develop within a bubble.  The guns used by imperialist invaders would not function without gunpowder (or metallurgy).  "American culture" is not synonymous with "White culture."  Neither culture nor technology develops within a silo.  

Though we're all ultimately related, you've chosen to isolate human societies at one arbitrary point in time to claim superiority for one group... because of what?  Because European nations, on the whole, have greater material wealth than the African nations they once colonized?

When confronted by the economic "superiority" of Qatar or the UAE, you give those nations no credit for "values" (stereotypically sputtering out "ISIS" in the process) and attribute everything to natural resources.  If resources, not values, are responsible for Qatar's relative success, why not the United States, or all those nations who not only had their own resources to extract, but systematically pillaged the resources of others?  All that may qualify as "ancient history" in your mind, but ignoring history is like assuming Paris Hilton has a better work ethic than you do due to her inherited wealth.  

The truth of the matter is that you have no data whatsoever to support the notion that White people collectively share "superior values."  That you've threatened to drag "IQ levels" into this suggests that you're barely different from the sorts of "punk racist" folks you claim to despise.  Whereas they might argue that White people are "naturally smarter," you apparently have the audacity to suggest that people of color are somehow less intelligent "by choice," completely disregarding the role of social capital, priming, biases in standardized testing, disparities in the education system, and every other possible intervening factor.  

You can cite anecdotal Alger Hiss stories to prove that "anyone can succeed" if you like, but this would only undermine your own argument.  The success of an exceptional person no more disproves the persistence of racism than the launch of a satellite disproves gravity.  It's the amount of force required to achieve "escape velocity" that's at issue here.  

We all know that privileged slackers can and do attain material success in our society.  You're defining their "values" based on their success, and that is backwards beyond belief.  

 

[mr highness]

I'm sorry Methodical Management but that was just too much you've posted, that I can't really focus much on each individual statement, each sentence, each picture, etc and comment on each. I don't really want to take as much on every page because I believe everyone else should be able to express their opinions, everyone should be given a chance to post. I don't want this thread to be about attacking me nor should I be the focal point here. Because I never attacked anyone here. There were many things I've said that you never responded to, and just basically added more comments that are too complex to make the whole conversation confusing. I respect your attempt though. But I'll leave this here again because I feel this is one of the best things I've ever said, and sums a bit up of my whole point.

These punk cops ain't the problem, nation-wide violence is the TRUE problem. If we could all march and spread the world to end violence on humanity, we could be doing things. But nope, we just complain about racism and just let our own black brothers kill other black brothers and brown brothers kill other brown brothers. This just angers the white racist community and scares them, hence why they're so quick to pull that trigger. I'm not an evil man like you guys perceive me to me, I'm just a colored man with reason, I look at statistics before I go to any conclusion. You guys have to basically insult me half of the time on your posts, and that basically proves my point, some of you guys have to attack me online. I never disrespected anybody in this thread. I try to reason, and be professional here as I can with good composure. Yet I get called, "dense". People still don't get it.

It's the same black violence that got my favorite rappers 2Pac and Biggie killed as well as other important black figures I look up to. Look at this link: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/s/lil-wayne-tour-bus-shooting-leads-gang-charges-185926961.html Lil Wayne could have been next on that list too. And I like some of his music.

There's other things to be doing out here for me, that I rather not be online to try to reason with people who don't want to see the picture I'm trying to paint and just understand where both sides are coming from. Because I know people here just want to online argue with me to get respect and reps which is really pointless.

 

[Methodical Management]

 

[nawghtyhare]

Black dude at the upper right looks like he gonna sing
Bottom right seems like he hates his own kind
Ala Bernie Mack from don't be a menace

Time out, there are two sides of that majority, the side with reason, and the side with hate (racists). I'm the side with reason. But many of us go by statistics. These punk racist whites always perceive the black man as a thug because of shootings, murder news, "hoods", majority black populated cities such as Detroit, the killings in Africa as well as their countries status, violence in some rap music, slapping "girls", etc.

You're only fooling yourself on that one.  The "racist whites [who] always perceive the black man as a thug because of shootings, murder news, "hoods", majority black populated cities such as Detroit, the killings in Africa as well as their countries status, violence in some rap music, slapping "girls", etc." could cite "statistics" in the same way you do (vaguely, selectively, and inaccurately) to make the same basic point: "White people are superior."  

The two different camps are the old school racists who believe in biological inferiority and the neoliberal racists who believe in cultural inferiority.  Favoring the latter hardly qualifies as siding with "reason." 

In the end, you've been pretty blatant and overt in asserting White supremacist ideology - trotting out all the old racist canards in the process.  (Violence/criminality, intelligence, work ethic...)  The process through which you've attempted to support these vulgar, antiquated stereotypes is hardly scientific.


You start with the judgment/conclusion first and then engage in lazy ex post facto hypothesizing to try and reverse engineer an argument that could support your preconceived notions about people of color.  


You claim to go by statistics, but, as we've seen, you've failed to articulate any specific definition for "good values," let alone demonstrated that White people, globally, all share the same "good values."  As I've explained, when you get into the business of inferring values from results, then positing those values as the cause of said results, you're engaging in circular reasoning.  

This flawed line of thinking is nothing more than a Social Darwinist tautology, which defines fitness by outcome.  Who’s fit?  Someone who succeeds economically.  Who’s unfit?  Someone who fails to succeed economically.  Such reasoning doesn't define "fitness" independent of results, it simply describes and justifies those results.  


The minute you've been asked to supply us with some sort of testable hypothesis, everything falls to pieces.  


I find it particularly ironic that, in the process of attempting to defend White Americans against stereotyping, you've attempted to claim that White people globally all share the same "superior" culture.  As "proof", you've tried to cherry pick the case of Germany as an example of a country purportedly pulling itself up by the bootstraps - like "if they can rebuild after World War II, certainly African nations should have no problem recovering from the imperialism."  Such a comparison is impossibly simplistic and woefully ignorant.  

You're foisting European nations - which you're crudely and transparently attempting to present as a proxy for "White nations" -  as the pinnacle of civilization... based on what, exactly?  Their own unique technological innovations?  How many of those would be possible without written language?  Without agriculture?  You do realize that all human beings can trace their roots back to sub-Saharan Africa, correct?  European civilizations did not develop within a bubble.  The guns used by imperialist invaders would not function without gunpowder (or metallurgy).  "American culture" is not synonymous with "White culture."  Neither culture nor technology develops within a silo.  

Though we're all ultimately related, you've chosen to isolate human societies at one arbitrary point in time to claim superiority for one group... because of what?  Because European nations, on the whole, have greater material wealth than the African nations they once colonized?


When confronted by the economic "superiority" of Qatar or the UAE, you give those nations no credit for "values" (stereotypically sputtering out "ISIS" in the process) and attribute everything to natural resources.  If resources, not values, are responsible for Qatar's relative success, why not the United States, or all those nations who not only had their own resources to extract, but systematically pillaged the resources of others?  All that may qualify as "ancient history" in your mind, but ignoring history is like assuming Paris Hilton has a better work ethic than you do due to her inherited wealth.  


The truth of the matter is that you have no data whatsoever to support the notion that White people collectively share "superior values."  That you've threatened to drag "IQ levels" into this suggests that you're barely different from the sorts of "punk racist" folks you claim to despise.  Whereas they might argue that White people are "naturally smarter," you apparently have the audacity to suggest that people of color are somehow less intelligent "by choice," completely disregarding the role of social capital, priming, biases in standardized testing, disparities in the education system, and every other possible intervening factor.  

You can cite anecdotal Alger Hiss stories to prove that "anyone can succeed" if you like, but this would only undermine your own argument.  The success of an exceptional person no more disproves the persistence of racism than the launch of a satellite disproves gravity.  It's the amount of force required to achieve "escape velocity" that's at issue here.  

We all know that privileged slackers can and do attain material success in our society.  You're defining their "values" based on their success, and that is backwards beyond belief.  



View media item 1558060
View media item 1558061
View media item 1558062
View media item 1558063


View media item 1558066

Quoted so I can save those pics for later
Man I appreciate ur posts
I enjoy the way Ur able to articulate ur thoughts and get ur point across

 

[mr highness]

Because I never attacked anyone here.

When you're suggesting that people of color are somehow culturally inferior, you're attacking an awful lot of people. 

Your position is inherently disrespectful and insulting. 

By no means do I intend to disrespect anyone. I went by how society is today, and analyzed why European countries are 1st world. It's not always about how they've been dominating other countries and stealing, because I know that's not what they all nor what they EXACTLY did. Many countries are still rich with natural resources. Europeans established ways and capitalized on what they have and implemented to help their society. They traded with other nations. This doesn't mean a culture is superior over the others. They just applied a more better concept of economic business for a successful country. Africa has plenty of natural resources, oil, metal and diamonds. But the majority of their leaders only care for themselves with little regard to their own people. If I disrespected people, then statistics is racist and disrespectful.

In some parts of Asia, they overfish until the certain fish is depleted but never realized the mistake until it's gone. Didn't capitalize on it.

To add, Methodical Management, some of your comments too have flaws, first you bring up Happy Planet Index, there's too many variables with that and there's some criticism on how to measure it. I did some research and came up with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Planet_Index#Criticism I don't want to copy and paste it here because it will probably take up half the page here. But if you could paste something from Wikipedia, then I could too. Also you never responded if there are any white European countries in the list of highest murder rates http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/10/worlds-highest-murder-rates_n_5125188.html. These are statistics that give reasons why some cities, countries don't succeed.

Also, can you explain why some of the highest population of Black cities are on the list of most dangerous cities? They measure murder rates, so statistics is once again racist and disrespectful.

 

[spacedoodoo]

By no means do I intend to disrespect anyone. I went by how society is today, and analyzed why European countries are 1st world. It's not always about how they've been dominating other countries and stealing, because I know that's not what they all nor what they EXACTLY did. Many countries are still rich with natural resources. Europeans established ways and capitalized on what they have and implemented to help their society. They traded with other nations. This doesn't mean a culture is superior over the others. They just applied a more better concept of economic business for a successful country. Africa has plenty of natural resources, oil, metal and diamonds. But the majority of their leaders only care for themselves with little regard to their own people. If I disrespected people, then statistics is racist and disrespectful.

In some parts of Asia, they overfish until the certain fish is depleted but never realized the mistake until it's gone. Didn't capitalize on it.
 

What kind of ignorance are you on. Horrible generalizations after another. And to really state that many European countries didn't steal and plunder other nations to get ahead is truly preposterous. 

 

[sugafree]

 

 
You're only fooling yourself on that one.  The "racist whites [who] always perceive the black man as a thug because of shootings, murder news, "hoods", majority black populated cities such as Detroit, the killings in Africa as well as their countries status, violence in some rap music, slapping "girls", etc." could cite "statistics" in the same way you do (vaguely, selectively, and inaccurately) to make the same basic point: "White people are superior."  

The two different camps are the old school racists who believe in biological inferiority and the neoliberal racists who believe in cultural inferiority.  Favoring the latter hardly qualifies as siding with "reason." 

In the end, you've been pretty blatant and overt in asserting White supremacist ideology - trotting out all the old racist canards in the process.  (Violence/criminality, intelligence, work ethic...)  The process through which you've attempted to support these vulgar, antiquated stereotypes is hardly scientific.

You start with the judgment/conclusion first and then engage in lazy ex post facto hypothesizing to try and reverse engineer an argument that could support your preconceived notions about people of color.  

You claim to go by statistics, but, as we've seen, you've failed to articulate any specific definition for "good values," let alone demonstrated that White people, globally, all share the same "good values."  As I've explained, when you get into the business of inferring values from results, then positing those values as the cause of said results, you're engaging in circular reasoning.  

This flawed line of thinking is nothing more than a Social Darwinist tautology, which defines fitness by outcome.  Who’s fit?  Someone who succeeds economically.  Who’s unfit?  Someone who fails to succeed economically.  Such reasoning doesn't define "fitness" independent of results, it simply describes and justifies those results.  

The minute you've been asked to supply us with some sort of testable hypothesis, everything falls to pieces.  

I find it particularly ironic that, in the process of attempting to defend White Americans against stereotyping, you've attempted to claim that White people globally all share the same "superior" culture.  As "proof", you've tried to cherry pick the case of Germany as an example of a country purportedly pulling itself up by the bootstraps - like "if they can rebuild after World War II, certainly African nations should have no problem recovering from the imperialism."  Such a comparison is impossibly simplistic and woefully ignorant.  

You're foisting European nations - which you're crudely and transparently attempting to present as a proxy for "White nations" -  as the pinnacle of civilization... based on what, exactly?  Their own unique technological innovations?  How many of those would be possible without written language?  Without agriculture?  You do realize that all human beings can trace their roots back to sub-Saharan Africa, correct?  European civilizations did not develop within a bubble.  The guns used by imperialist invaders would not function without gunpowder (or metallurgy).  "American culture" is not synonymous with "White culture."  Neither culture nor technology develops within a silo.  

Though we're all ultimately related, you've chosen to isolate human societies at one arbitrary point in time to claim superiority for one group... because of what?  Because European nations, on the whole, have greater material wealth than the African nations they once colonized?

When confronted by the economic "superiority" of Qatar or the UAE, you give those nations no credit for "values" (stereotypically sputtering out "ISIS" in the process) and attribute everything to natural resources.  If resources, not values, are responsible for Qatar's relative success, why not the United States, or all those nations who not only had their own resources to extract, but systematically pillaged the resources of others?  All that may qualify as "ancient history" in your mind, but ignoring history is like assuming Paris Hilton has a better work ethic than you do due to her inherited wealth.  

The truth of the matter is that you have no data whatsoever to support the notion that White people collectively share "superior values."  That you've threatened to drag "IQ levels" into this suggests that you're barely different from the sorts of "punk racist" folks you claim to despise.  Whereas they might argue that White people are "naturally smarter," you apparently have the audacity to suggest that people of color are somehow less intelligent "by choice," completely disregarding the role of social capital, priming, biases in standardized testing, disparities in the education system, and every other possible intervening factor.  

You can cite anecdotal Alger Hiss stories to prove that "anyone can succeed" if you like, but this would only undermine your own argument.  The success of an exceptional person no more disproves the persistence of racism than the launch of a satellite disproves gravity.  It's the amount of force required to achieve "escape velocity" that's at issue here.  

We all know that privileged slackers can and do attain material success in our society.  You're defining their "values" based on their success, and that is backwards beyond belief.  

Repped!

Eye opening!

 

[Methodical Management]

If I disrespected people, then statistics is racist and disrespectful.

Statistics require interpretation.  You have to decide what to measure, how to measure it, and how to interpret the results.  

If you look at women's salaries compared to men's and choose to interpret that as a sign that women are less ambitious, capable, or intelligent than men, it's not the "statistic" that's sexist and disrespectful, it's your interpretation of that statistic.

If you look at arrest rates and choose to interpret that as evidence that people of color are biologically predisposed to violence, it's not the "statistic" that's racist and disrespectful, it's your interpretation of that statistic.

The same "stats" you're trying to reference could be used to demonstrate the persistence of racial bias in the criminal justice system.  In the case of arrest rates, consider drug crimes.  I'll just quote a point made in an earlier post:

More than HALF of all prisoners currently serving federal sentences of one year or longer were convicted of drug offenses.  

According to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (2000), White teenagers are over 33% more likely to have sold illegal drugs than their Black counterparts.  

Usage rates for marijuana are approximately the same regardless of race.  However, according to this same survey, White students are SEVEN TIMES more likely to use cocaine and heroin.  Before you say "well, that's just self-report survey data," bear in mind that White youth visit hospital emergency rooms due to illegal drug use three times  more than Black youth.

Yet, despite this, THREE QUARTERS of those imprisoned for drug crimes are Black or Latino.  

So let's not act like you're just letting the facts speak for themselves here.  

 

[mr highness]

By no means do I intend to disrespect anyone. I went by how society is today, and analyzed why European countries are 1st world. It's not always about how they've been dominating other countries and stealing, because I know that's not what they all nor what they EXACTLY did. Many countries are still rich with natural resources. Europeans established ways and capitalized on what they have and implemented to help their society. They traded with other nations. This doesn't mean a culture is superior over the others. They just applied a more better concept of economic business for a successful country. Africa has plenty of natural resources, oil, metal and diamonds. But the majority of their leaders only care for themselves with little regard to their own people. If I disrespected people, then statistics is racist and disrespectful.


In some parts of Asia, they overfish until the certain fish is depleted but never realized the mistake until it's gone. Didn't capitalize on it.

 

What kind of ignorance are you on. Horrible generalizations after another. And to really state that many European countries didn't steal and plunder other nations to get ahead is truly preposterous. 

I underlined the part you likely didn't read. I'm implying that some white nations succeeded without stealing. And you are also generalizing too. Ironically. Because not all European/white populated nations stole and plunder other nations. You do realize that when the slavery era came to be, some African leaders sold black slaves to Europeans right? And you know Africans weren't the first slaves in Europe right? Also you know that a black man was the first to own a black slave and that some black families owned black slaves in the U.S right? It's documented from the last time I researched. Ever heard of Irish slaves?

 

[mr highness]

@Methodical Management but the statistics have to be specific though. That woman statistics you mentioned is an awful one, you interpret based on specifics. Just because women make less than men, does not necessarily conclude that they're less hard working, less intelligence, etc. Now if you measure out of men and women, which are more likely to be vegetarian, and women win with 80%, then we can conclude that women are more likely vegetarian than men based on these measures, that's specific. That's the specific statistics I'm looking at. You gave me a table of murder rates and it said Americas have higher murder rates. That's not a good statistical measure, because it's too general.

More than HALF of all prisoners currently serving federal sentences of one year or longer were convicted of drug offenses.  



According to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (2000), White teenagers are over 33% more likely to have sold illegal drugs than their Black counterparts.  

Usage rates for marijuana are approximately the same regardless of race.  However, according to this same survey, White students are SEVEN TIMES more likely to use cocaine and heroin.  Before you say "well, that's just self-report survey data," bear in mind that White youth visit hospital emergency rooms due to illegal drug use three times more than Black youth.

Yet, despite this, THREE QUARTERS of those imprisoned for drug crimes are Black or Latino.  

This makes sense, because a majority white people have the money, and can afford these more hardcore drugs. White people are more of the targeted customers when it comes to drugs. I know plenty of white people that actually do cocaine. That's why some rich people resort to drugs. They have the money. Also another variable, there is still 60%+ white population in the U.S. Blacks and Latinos are likely going to sell these drugs because that's a major source of money for many cities due to poverty. And as a general rule, you can catch a seller better than you can catch a user. A seller will be out in the streets, but a user of the drug will be in his home.

 

[$tatus $ymbol]

You do realize that when the slavery era came to be, some African leaders sold black slaves to Europeans right? And you know Africans weren't the first slaves in Europe right? Also you know that a black man was the first to own a black slave and that some black families owned black slaves in the U.S right? It's documented from the last time I researched. Ever heard of Irish slaves?

Why is anyone even wasting time arguing with this fool?

 

[spacedoodoo]

I underlined the part you likely didn't read. I'm implying that some white nations succeeded without stealing. And you are also generalizing too. Ironically. Because not all European/white populated nations stole and plunder other nations. You do realize that when the slavery era came to be, some African leaders sold black slaves to Europeans right? And you know Africans weren't the first slaves in Europe right? Also you know that a black man was the first to own a black slave and that some black families owned black slaves in the U.S right? It's documented from the last time I researched. Ever heard of Irish slaves?

 here you go again trying to justify your "cultural inferiority" and "better values" point with africa. Pointing out how they sold their own people and what not, which isn't even entirely accurate but I digress.. Remember that country Germany you made an example of earlier? The country that rose from the ashes and dust of WWII to become a great nation due to its values and hard work! But.. Answer this question. What caused WWII?.. didn't Germany start one of the biggest atrocities in human history? The Holocaust? Weren't the Polish and Dutch Jews, fellow european countries alongside Nazi Germany? Oh. But I'm supposed to believe your points about Africa's lesser values and Germany's higher values right? You're argument is null and void. Good day to you sir. 

 

[Sir San Diego]

Why is anyone even wasting time arguing with this fool?

Why is anyone even wasting time arguing with this fool?

Why is anyone even wasting time arguing with this fool?

Why is anyone even wasting time arguing with this fool?

Why is anyone even wasting time arguing with this fool?

Why?


This dude highness is corny. What are y'all getting out of the argument?