- 3,674
- 3,433
And what would that observation be?
Because calling the singer rebellious for describing herself as a boss ignores all the women of the bible who did behave as bosses (lots of stories in the OT).
The aggressive lady is showing her own ignorance of the religion she pretends to defend.
it doesn’t seem to me to be a contradiction that the bible or any religious doctrine would point out that there are coexisting power structures and that women do have their own influence such that they can wield power & lead. i’m not a religious scholar but i think it is very interesting that people will claim a religion/religiosity but not really adhering to most of the tenets, picking a choosing what parts apply & when…now obviously i don’t know how the woman in question actually practices her faith but even what you reference would seem to imply women of power/status & in leadership of men to be the exception/exceptional rather than the rule…
the thing that i always find interesting is that all these women that claim they are/aspire to be bosses also want their partner to be a boss type that is able to lead them? i guess i get it, but if one is a boss, wouldn’t they want to be in that seat of power at all times?? can one really choose to turn that off???
Why is she speaking for men? Men love women who are bosses or able to generate their own money.
People need to stop listening to idiots and taking advice from idiots. Be your own person. Formulate your own ideas
depends on what you mean by the statement
Men love women who are bosses or able to generate their own money.
i find it disingenuous when people make arguments in bad faith, to say that men actively would pursue women on the basis of their financial status is not a good faith argument (because most men can’t even execute on such a preference) and a man that would is probably not the man that women would prefer or are thinking of, but since so many women think that how they evaluate men is how men also evaluate women they fall into that mode of thinking.
while i know women can/do/will ‘wife’ men that they choose…it isn’t norm, it typically doesn’t last (especially if that man doesn’t convert on whatever timeline of potential value that women sees) and often becomes an anecdote for why the woman won’t entertain such an arrangement going forward; which isn’t to say there aren’t exceptions but given all the data around dating/relationships/marriage today any man banking on finding a women that is more economically viable than him taking him serious should, quite literally, not quit his day job…
saying that men don’t care at all about what/how a women contributes financially, is definitely a gripe i have with those that are of the opinion that women in that ‘girl boss’ position aren’t attractive it just doesn’t tend to be nearly the same attraction trigger for men as it is for women. in 2023 most people will need dual incomes so it isn’t the case that most men could even entertain these ‘pillow princess’ types but it certainly isn’t the case that most men would either qualify or disqualify a women on the basis of income they way women do
Last edited: