im not you
Banned
- 7,863
- 11
- Joined
- May 29, 2009
where?
what is Lawson better then flynn at? he cant be a TRUE PG like flynn can, he cant shoot like flynn, he cant play in a halfcourt offense like flynn, he doesnt have the PG vision that flynn does,elite athleticism from flynn and lawson not so much and he dont play D like flynn
Only thing that's really a standout between the two is Halfcourt Efficiency...neither of them can really shoot and make them when needed. As it standsright now you'd be far better off letting either of them shoot a jumper as opposed to going to the rack. As far as vision goes...I think that'sdebatable. He probably jumps higher than Lawson...but I'd willing to bet when those vertical numbers are release that Lawson's vert won't be thatfar off from Flynns. Lawson CAN get up. He's just not going to do what Flynn does in the air. Athleticism includes alot more than just jumping and I'mnot sure Flynn has Lawson in the other facets of athleticism...such as speed, quickness, agility, etc. I'll give you D.
Basically, I'm not agreeing that Lawson is better than Flynn but the gap is certainly not as big as some of you all are making it out to be. 10 Years fromnow if Lawson was to have a better career than Flynn it wouldn't come as a surprise to me personally. If I had topick one...right now I'd probably take Flynn and that's because Lawson hasn't shown that he's an elite point guard in the half court set likeFlynn has.
. Meanwhile, Gonzaga's 
