- 6,549
- 2,596
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2002
Thats what Im thinking, GS never even brought in curry for a workout
Delete.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by lazyj10,
- Start date
- 1,903
- 10
- Joined
- May 27, 2006
I'm looking on RealGM and a lot of people think it was for the Suns.
- 532
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
Curry was the top player in the NCAA this year, everybody knows what he can do. Curry explained that the reason why he didn't work out with GSW was due toscheduling conflicts, nothing else.
Biedrins + Curry for an extended Amare?
Very tempting deal, it would have been perfect jennings slipped to 14 and if we got PHX's 14th pick along with Amare.. one can only dream
Biedrins + Curry for an extended Amare?
Very tempting deal, it would have been perfect jennings slipped to 14 and if we got PHX's 14th pick along with Amare.. one can only dream
- 667
- 49
- Joined
- May 4, 2009
If true.
- 2,656
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2004
if suns pick earl clark...i can def see a trade going down between the two teams.
- 9,560
- 1,478
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
forget amare! dude is washed up
- 4,769
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2004
I still wouldn't do the trade if the W's are giving up Biedrins, Bellinelli, Wright, and Curry. Where are the latest trade rumors at?
Dissapointed with this trade completely.
Dissapointed with this trade completely.
- 1,903
- 10
- Joined
- May 27, 2006
Yup. Amar'e does not make this team much better if at all. If TWill fell and they got him then I would have been a little better off with atrade. Young would be too early at 14 and I'd much rather keep Curry and roll with the squad they have. No need to keep *%@!#$% up by staying young andthen getting someone they don't need and wasting all that money and in this case talent.Originally Posted by M0B DEEP
If true.
- 28,061
- 9,181
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
For everyone saying they are happy with Curry, please tell me if your thoughts on my opinion......
We trade Jamal Crawford because he doesnt fit our system. Then we draft Stephen Curry, who is a crappier version of Crawford.
Am I wrong?
We trade Jamal Crawford because he doesnt fit our system. Then we draft Stephen Curry, who is a crappier version of Crawford.
Am I wrong?
- 1,903
- 10
- Joined
- May 27, 2006
Curry's younger, smaller contract, and can still become better. He still can fill out and work on his game while Crawford is basically stuckwith his now.
- 12,395
- 6,831
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2000
givin up too much for amare.
- 7,084
- 45
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
^exactly what i was saying.
only thing is, nelly might not play him
only thing is, nelly might not play him
- 382
- 10
- Joined
- May 30, 2007
for me it was never a matter of crawford not fitting the system...it was the contract really...plus steph is a much better shooter
so ESPN says no trade tonight if there is going to be one...and steph curry was not included...just BW, Marco, and Beans...if we are able to extend Stat them Ithink I would be down
- 9,560
- 1,478
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
who jus saw that trade rumor? WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF? I AM OFFICIALLY BOYCOTTING THE WARRIORS IF THAT TRADE GOES DOWN. BEANS, BELINELLI, WRIGHT FOR AMARE?R U #!*#%!* KIDDING ME?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- 3,677
- 57
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
Jamal's contract was way too much and he shot under 40 percent. Curry will be under a rookie contract and I think will be a better shooterthan Jamal.
- 1,903
- 10
- Joined
- May 27, 2006
Way too much. He doesn't give much else other than that offense. Once again the Warriors overrating points/scoring, shown last year withJackson extension and Maggette signing.
- 667
- 49
- Joined
- May 4, 2009
ESPN just showed the rumor for Amar'e. They said it wont be finalized until July 8.
GSW gets: Amare
SUNS get: Andris, Marco, B.Wright.
So i dont think Curry is in the deal..
But still i think we giving too much.
GSW gets: Amare
SUNS get: Andris, Marco, B.Wright.
So i dont think Curry is in the deal..
But still i think we giving too much.
- 2,293
- 13
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
honestly thats fairly even. Belenelli and Wright aren't anything.
- 2,656
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2004
^^July 1st.
edit:
has something to do with biedrins being a BYC player.
edit:
has something to do with biedrins being a BYC player.
- 9,560
- 1,478
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
^ what is wrong with just letting young talent develop?! of course they arent anything right now but they showed potential last year when they got pt.
What exactly is BWright for the Warriors that can't be replaced or something we don't have?
Seriously?
Its a lot, and I do believe Beli will be good, but he's not something you can't find somewhere else.
It would be a sign that they didn't think Beans was worth the contract. Period.
Amare clears the books and we actually have cap room to entertain someone good? I'd be quite happy with that versus what it looks like now.
Seriously?
Its a lot, and I do believe Beli will be good, but he's not something you can't find somewhere else.
It would be a sign that they didn't think Beans was worth the contract. Period.
Amare clears the books and we actually have cap room to entertain someone good? I'd be quite happy with that versus what it looks like now.
- 2,570
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2009
- 15,437
- 182
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2007
You serious?
- 2,822
- 122
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2004
I don't even know what to think anymore. I don't like the Curry pick nor do I like the Amar'e trade rumor.
And why is ESPN still using the old logo with thunder in it?
Dickie V saying Curry will be the ROY...
And why is ESPN still using the old logo with thunder in it?
Dickie V saying Curry will be the ROY...
- 2,293
- 13
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
Really? Yall think Belenelli is going to develop into something? Wright I could see but with the exploding development of Randolph it changesthat. It's Amare!Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt
You serious?
Ellis, Curry, Randolph, Turiaf, Amare
